Multiple Spring Security filters











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I have 2 Spring Security WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter configs. I want to filter all requests to path /filter1 with filter 1, excluding /filter1/filter2 path. The latter one I want to filter with filter 2. How can I achieve it?



Filter 1 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("filter1/filter2/**").permitAll()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}


Filter 2 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}









share|improve this question
























  • Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
    – Him
    2 days ago










  • Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago










  • @M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • @Him it is not working
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I have 2 Spring Security WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter configs. I want to filter all requests to path /filter1 with filter 1, excluding /filter1/filter2 path. The latter one I want to filter with filter 2. How can I achieve it?



Filter 1 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("filter1/filter2/**").permitAll()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}


Filter 2 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}









share|improve this question
























  • Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
    – Him
    2 days ago










  • Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago










  • @M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • @Him it is not working
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











I have 2 Spring Security WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter configs. I want to filter all requests to path /filter1 with filter 1, excluding /filter1/filter2 path. The latter one I want to filter with filter 2. How can I achieve it?



Filter 1 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("filter1/filter2/**").permitAll()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}


Filter 2 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}









share|improve this question















I have 2 Spring Security WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter configs. I want to filter all requests to path /filter1 with filter 1, excluding /filter1/filter2 path. The latter one I want to filter with filter 2. How can I achieve it?



Filter 1 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("filter1/filter2/**").permitAll()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}


Filter 2 config:



@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
}






spring spring-boot spring-security






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









dur

6,967133560




6,967133560










asked 2 days ago









Alvin Mahmudov

339




339












  • Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
    – Him
    2 days ago










  • Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago










  • @M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • @Him it is not working
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago


















  • Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
    – Him
    2 days ago










  • Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago










  • @M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • @Him it is not working
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago
















Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
– Him
2 days ago




Did you try something like "filter1/{^(filter2)}/**" for the second filter allowing only authenticated requests? It basically uses regex for filter2, but I am not sure if this is completely supported (though regexes for path variables are supported).
– Him
2 days ago












Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
– M. Deinum
2 days ago




Why? What do you want to achieve with multiple security filters?
– M. Deinum
2 days ago












@M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago




@M.Deinum I want to use separate authentications for each url.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago












@Him it is not working
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago




@Him it is not working
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago












If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago




If that is what you want you don't need separate filters for that. Start with an antMatcher that matches the path and configure it.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Just write a single configuration, ordering the urls in the way they should match (ordering is important here!).



Something like the following



http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class)
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);


Should do that. It will match the most specific one and use that filter chain. Not sure if you need to move the .authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() to each mapping as well.






share|improve this answer





















  • The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago












  • I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago






  • 1




    ` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238234%2fmultiple-spring-security-filters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Just write a single configuration, ordering the urls in the way they should match (ordering is important here!).



Something like the following



http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class)
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);


Should do that. It will match the most specific one and use that filter chain. Not sure if you need to move the .authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() to each mapping as well.






share|improve this answer





















  • The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago












  • I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago






  • 1




    ` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago

















up vote
1
down vote













Just write a single configuration, ordering the urls in the way they should match (ordering is important here!).



Something like the following



http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class)
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);


Should do that. It will match the most specific one and use that filter chain. Not sure if you need to move the .authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() to each mapping as well.






share|improve this answer





















  • The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago












  • I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago






  • 1




    ` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Just write a single configuration, ordering the urls in the way they should match (ordering is important here!).



Something like the following



http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class)
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);


Should do that. It will match the most specific one and use that filter chain. Not sure if you need to move the .authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() to each mapping as well.






share|improve this answer












Just write a single configuration, ordering the urls in the way they should match (ordering is important here!).



Something like the following



http
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated()
.and()
.antMatcher("filter1/filter2/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter2, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class)
.antMatcher("filter1/**")
.addFilterBefore(filter1, FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);


Should do that. It will match the most specific one and use that filter chain. Not sure if you need to move the .authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() to each mapping as well.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









M. Deinum

66k11132146




66k11132146












  • The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago












  • I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago






  • 1




    ` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago




















  • The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago












  • I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago










  • They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
    – M. Deinum
    2 days ago






  • 1




    ` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
    – Alvin Mahmudov
    2 days ago


















The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago




The only thing is, I don't need filter1 to be triggered if filter2 has been triggered.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago












It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago






It doesn't. It will match the specific one. The first chain that matches will be executed. Hence ordering is important here.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago














I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago




I just tested and both filters get called. First filter2 then filter1. Even if the path doesn't match. Maybe that is because the filters are defined as spring beans.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago












They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago




They get called because they are part of the normal filter chain and not just the security filter chain. Add an additional FilterRegistrationBean and disable the filter with that (setting the enabled property to false) to prevent them from being registered in the regular filter chain.
– M. Deinum
2 days ago




1




1




` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago






` @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration(SecurityFilter filter2) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter2); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } @Bean public FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistration2(SecurityFilter filter1) { FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean(filter1); registration.setEnabled(false); return registration; } ` I already have.They are called only when I am accessing filter1 or filter2 paths.
– Alvin Mahmudov
2 days ago




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53238234%2fmultiple-spring-security-filters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

さくらももこ

13 indicted, 8 arrested in Calif. drug cartel investigation