Dart/WebStorm “Cancel instances of dart.async.StreamSubscription”












0















I am using WenStorm 2018.2.5 (registered), with the Dart plugin.



While editing a simple code, the editor shows me a message:




Cancel instances of dart.async.StreamSubscription




enter image description here



I don't understand what this message means. I don't see what's wrong with the code. And, if I run the code inspection, the result is : "No suspicious code found".



Any idea ?



Note :



const int eventsCount = 5;
const int waitBetweenTwoEvents = 1;

typedef Streamer = Stream<int> Function();

...

Streamer streamCreator = () async* {
for(int i=0; i<eventsCount; i++) {
yield i;
sleep(Duration(seconds: waitBetweenTwoEvents));
}
};









share|improve this question





























    0















    I am using WenStorm 2018.2.5 (registered), with the Dart plugin.



    While editing a simple code, the editor shows me a message:




    Cancel instances of dart.async.StreamSubscription




    enter image description here



    I don't understand what this message means. I don't see what's wrong with the code. And, if I run the code inspection, the result is : "No suspicious code found".



    Any idea ?



    Note :



    const int eventsCount = 5;
    const int waitBetweenTwoEvents = 1;

    typedef Streamer = Stream<int> Function();

    ...

    Streamer streamCreator = () async* {
    for(int i=0; i<eventsCount; i++) {
    yield i;
    sleep(Duration(seconds: waitBetweenTwoEvents));
    }
    };









    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0


      1






      I am using WenStorm 2018.2.5 (registered), with the Dart plugin.



      While editing a simple code, the editor shows me a message:




      Cancel instances of dart.async.StreamSubscription




      enter image description here



      I don't understand what this message means. I don't see what's wrong with the code. And, if I run the code inspection, the result is : "No suspicious code found".



      Any idea ?



      Note :



      const int eventsCount = 5;
      const int waitBetweenTwoEvents = 1;

      typedef Streamer = Stream<int> Function();

      ...

      Streamer streamCreator = () async* {
      for(int i=0; i<eventsCount; i++) {
      yield i;
      sleep(Duration(seconds: waitBetweenTwoEvents));
      }
      };









      share|improve this question
















      I am using WenStorm 2018.2.5 (registered), with the Dart plugin.



      While editing a simple code, the editor shows me a message:




      Cancel instances of dart.async.StreamSubscription




      enter image description here



      I don't understand what this message means. I don't see what's wrong with the code. And, if I run the code inspection, the result is : "No suspicious code found".



      Any idea ?



      Note :



      const int eventsCount = 5;
      const int waitBetweenTwoEvents = 1;

      typedef Streamer = Stream<int> Function();

      ...

      Streamer streamCreator = () async* {
      for(int i=0; i<eventsCount; i++) {
      yield i;
      sleep(Duration(seconds: waitBetweenTwoEvents));
      }
      };






      dart webstorm






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 12 '18 at 15:52









      Günter Zöchbauer

      317k66940884




      317k66940884










      asked Nov 12 '18 at 15:40









      Denis BeuriveDenis Beurive

      94




      94
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          This is shown when you have the linter rule enabled in analysis_options.yaml



          linter:
          rules:
          - cancel_subscriptions


          Either




          • add subscription.cancel() somewhere in that class.

          • remove the linter rule

          • add a comment // ignore: cancel_subscriptions the line before or at the end of the line that shows the warning

          • add a comment // ignore_for_file: cancel_subscriptions somewhere in the file






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:48











          • That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

            – Günter Zöchbauer
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:51



















          1














          As others have pointed out, you have a lint that requires you to cancel subscriptions.



          In this case, I would just not create a subscription at all. Stream subscriptions are great when you want to control the stream by pausing or cancelling it early, or handling errors.
          Here you just want to do something for each data event. That's what the Stream.forEach method does. It even returns a future that is completed when the stream is done or has errored, so you don't need to do subscription.asFuture.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 13 '18 at 14:34











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53265478%2fdart-webstorm-cancel-instances-of-dart-async-streamsubscription%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          This is shown when you have the linter rule enabled in analysis_options.yaml



          linter:
          rules:
          - cancel_subscriptions


          Either




          • add subscription.cancel() somewhere in that class.

          • remove the linter rule

          • add a comment // ignore: cancel_subscriptions the line before or at the end of the line that shows the warning

          • add a comment // ignore_for_file: cancel_subscriptions somewhere in the file






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:48











          • That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

            – Günter Zöchbauer
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:51
















          2














          This is shown when you have the linter rule enabled in analysis_options.yaml



          linter:
          rules:
          - cancel_subscriptions


          Either




          • add subscription.cancel() somewhere in that class.

          • remove the linter rule

          • add a comment // ignore: cancel_subscriptions the line before or at the end of the line that shows the warning

          • add a comment // ignore_for_file: cancel_subscriptions somewhere in the file






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:48











          • That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

            – Günter Zöchbauer
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:51














          2












          2








          2







          This is shown when you have the linter rule enabled in analysis_options.yaml



          linter:
          rules:
          - cancel_subscriptions


          Either




          • add subscription.cancel() somewhere in that class.

          • remove the linter rule

          • add a comment // ignore: cancel_subscriptions the line before or at the end of the line that shows the warning

          • add a comment // ignore_for_file: cancel_subscriptions somewhere in the file






          share|improve this answer













          This is shown when you have the linter rule enabled in analysis_options.yaml



          linter:
          rules:
          - cancel_subscriptions


          Either




          • add subscription.cancel() somewhere in that class.

          • remove the linter rule

          • add a comment // ignore: cancel_subscriptions the line before or at the end of the line that shows the warning

          • add a comment // ignore_for_file: cancel_subscriptions somewhere in the file







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 12 '18 at 15:49









          Günter ZöchbauerGünter Zöchbauer

          317k66940884




          317k66940884













          • Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:48











          • That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

            – Günter Zöchbauer
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:51



















          • Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:48











          • That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

            – Günter Zöchbauer
            Nov 12 '18 at 16:51

















          Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

          – Denis Beurive
          Nov 12 '18 at 16:48





          Thank you very much. I am not sure but I think that a stream subscription should be cancelled in order to allow the interpreter to make some clean up : "The stream may need to shut down the source of events and clean up after the subscription is canceled. Returns a future that is completed once the stream has finished its cleanup".

          – Denis Beurive
          Nov 12 '18 at 16:48













          That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

          – Günter Zöchbauer
          Nov 12 '18 at 16:51





          That's why the linter rule exists, but the linter rule doesn't understand your program. For example you might pass a reference to your subscription somewhere else to be cancelled there and the linter rule would not be able to follow that logic. You also might want to consume all events until the stream itself closes and don't intend to unsubscribe.

          – Günter Zöchbauer
          Nov 12 '18 at 16:51













          1














          As others have pointed out, you have a lint that requires you to cancel subscriptions.



          In this case, I would just not create a subscription at all. Stream subscriptions are great when you want to control the stream by pausing or cancelling it early, or handling errors.
          Here you just want to do something for each data event. That's what the Stream.forEach method does. It even returns a future that is completed when the stream is done or has errored, so you don't need to do subscription.asFuture.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 13 '18 at 14:34
















          1














          As others have pointed out, you have a lint that requires you to cancel subscriptions.



          In this case, I would just not create a subscription at all. Stream subscriptions are great when you want to control the stream by pausing or cancelling it early, or handling errors.
          Here you just want to do something for each data event. That's what the Stream.forEach method does. It even returns a future that is completed when the stream is done or has errored, so you don't need to do subscription.asFuture.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 13 '18 at 14:34














          1












          1








          1







          As others have pointed out, you have a lint that requires you to cancel subscriptions.



          In this case, I would just not create a subscription at all. Stream subscriptions are great when you want to control the stream by pausing or cancelling it early, or handling errors.
          Here you just want to do something for each data event. That's what the Stream.forEach method does. It even returns a future that is completed when the stream is done or has errored, so you don't need to do subscription.asFuture.






          share|improve this answer















          As others have pointed out, you have a lint that requires you to cancel subscriptions.



          In this case, I would just not create a subscription at all. Stream subscriptions are great when you want to control the stream by pausing or cancelling it early, or handling errors.
          Here you just want to do something for each data event. That's what the Stream.forEach method does. It even returns a future that is completed when the stream is done or has errored, so you don't need to do subscription.asFuture.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 13 '18 at 12:40

























          answered Nov 13 '18 at 7:31









          lrnlrn

          9,8941319




          9,8941319













          • Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 13 '18 at 14:34



















          • Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

            – Denis Beurive
            Nov 13 '18 at 14:34

















          Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

          – Denis Beurive
          Nov 13 '18 at 14:34





          Yes, I agree. However, I am learning Dart and I try many things in order to test my comprehension. This code is just an experiment.

          – Denis Beurive
          Nov 13 '18 at 14:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53265478%2fdart-webstorm-cancel-instances-of-dart-async-streamsubscription%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Coverage of Google Street View

          Full-time equivalent

          Surfing