Spring-Boot: Multi tenancy data integrity issue
I have multi tenant application build using spring boot. I am facing data integrity issue with JMS. i.e. tenant 1, tenant 2 client request data store into tenant 1 client. I observed issue with JmsReceiver marked with @Transaction annotation like example:
@Service
@Transactional
class DataReceiver{
@JmsListener(...)
fun receiveMessage(msg:Message<Data>){
}
}
If I remove transaction annotation from DataReceiver, it is fixed data integrity issue. but I don't understand why? is anybody know what is issue with @Transaction boundary in jms receiver. why should we not use it.
java spring-boot transactions jms multi-tenant
add a comment |
I have multi tenant application build using spring boot. I am facing data integrity issue with JMS. i.e. tenant 1, tenant 2 client request data store into tenant 1 client. I observed issue with JmsReceiver marked with @Transaction annotation like example:
@Service
@Transactional
class DataReceiver{
@JmsListener(...)
fun receiveMessage(msg:Message<Data>){
}
}
If I remove transaction annotation from DataReceiver, it is fixed data integrity issue. but I don't understand why? is anybody know what is issue with @Transaction boundary in jms receiver. why should we not use it.
java spring-boot transactions jms multi-tenant
add a comment |
I have multi tenant application build using spring boot. I am facing data integrity issue with JMS. i.e. tenant 1, tenant 2 client request data store into tenant 1 client. I observed issue with JmsReceiver marked with @Transaction annotation like example:
@Service
@Transactional
class DataReceiver{
@JmsListener(...)
fun receiveMessage(msg:Message<Data>){
}
}
If I remove transaction annotation from DataReceiver, it is fixed data integrity issue. but I don't understand why? is anybody know what is issue with @Transaction boundary in jms receiver. why should we not use it.
java spring-boot transactions jms multi-tenant
I have multi tenant application build using spring boot. I am facing data integrity issue with JMS. i.e. tenant 1, tenant 2 client request data store into tenant 1 client. I observed issue with JmsReceiver marked with @Transaction annotation like example:
@Service
@Transactional
class DataReceiver{
@JmsListener(...)
fun receiveMessage(msg:Message<Data>){
}
}
If I remove transaction annotation from DataReceiver, it is fixed data integrity issue. but I don't understand why? is anybody know what is issue with @Transaction boundary in jms receiver. why should we not use it.
java spring-boot transactions jms multi-tenant
java spring-boot transactions jms multi-tenant
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:55
bNdbNd
5,59742560
5,59742560
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261658%2fspring-boot-multi-tenancy-data-integrity-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261658%2fspring-boot-multi-tenancy-data-integrity-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown