SysUtils.LoadPackage replaces Aplication.OnMessage handler
I have a main form where I set a handler for the Application.OnMessage
event. (Code of this handler is placed in the main form). Then, while running the program, there can be calls to SysUtils.LoadPackage
that loads some bpl-package. And after that is loaded, the handler of Application.OnMessage
is changed.
I couldn't find what doing this. At least there is not right such code that goes Application.OnMessage :=
in the package.
One more thing: in the debugger, before LoadPackage, I see OnMessage handler described as Main.TMainForm.AppMessage
. All other handlers (such as OnMinimize, OnModalBegin e.t.c.) are nil. And after LoadPackage all events have handlers, described as Vcl.AppEvnts.TMultiCaster.DoMessage
.
delphi delphi-10.2-tokyo
|
show 7 more comments
I have a main form where I set a handler for the Application.OnMessage
event. (Code of this handler is placed in the main form). Then, while running the program, there can be calls to SysUtils.LoadPackage
that loads some bpl-package. And after that is loaded, the handler of Application.OnMessage
is changed.
I couldn't find what doing this. At least there is not right such code that goes Application.OnMessage :=
in the package.
One more thing: in the debugger, before LoadPackage, I see OnMessage handler described as Main.TMainForm.AppMessage
. All other handlers (such as OnMinimize, OnModalBegin e.t.c.) are nil. And after LoadPackage all events have handlers, described as Vcl.AppEvnts.TMultiCaster.DoMessage
.
delphi delphi-10.2-tokyo
2
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
1
Including unitAppEvents
will through unit's initialization create aTMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?)TApplication
events.
– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
2
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
1
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
1
@GolezTrol you are right thatTApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegatesTApplication
events to everyTApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers toTApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to addTApplicationEvents
to theMainForm
.
– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08
|
show 7 more comments
I have a main form where I set a handler for the Application.OnMessage
event. (Code of this handler is placed in the main form). Then, while running the program, there can be calls to SysUtils.LoadPackage
that loads some bpl-package. And after that is loaded, the handler of Application.OnMessage
is changed.
I couldn't find what doing this. At least there is not right such code that goes Application.OnMessage :=
in the package.
One more thing: in the debugger, before LoadPackage, I see OnMessage handler described as Main.TMainForm.AppMessage
. All other handlers (such as OnMinimize, OnModalBegin e.t.c.) are nil. And after LoadPackage all events have handlers, described as Vcl.AppEvnts.TMultiCaster.DoMessage
.
delphi delphi-10.2-tokyo
I have a main form where I set a handler for the Application.OnMessage
event. (Code of this handler is placed in the main form). Then, while running the program, there can be calls to SysUtils.LoadPackage
that loads some bpl-package. And after that is loaded, the handler of Application.OnMessage
is changed.
I couldn't find what doing this. At least there is not right such code that goes Application.OnMessage :=
in the package.
One more thing: in the debugger, before LoadPackage, I see OnMessage handler described as Main.TMainForm.AppMessage
. All other handlers (such as OnMinimize, OnModalBegin e.t.c.) are nil. And after LoadPackage all events have handlers, described as Vcl.AppEvnts.TMultiCaster.DoMessage
.
delphi delphi-10.2-tokyo
delphi delphi-10.2-tokyo
edited Nov 12 '18 at 16:17
GolezTrol
97.9k9130174
97.9k9130174
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:57
DaugawpilsDaugawpils
171
171
2
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
1
Including unitAppEvents
will through unit's initialization create aTMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?)TApplication
events.
– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
2
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
1
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
1
@GolezTrol you are right thatTApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegatesTApplication
events to everyTApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers toTApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to addTApplicationEvents
to theMainForm
.
– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08
|
show 7 more comments
2
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
1
Including unitAppEvents
will through unit's initialization create aTMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?)TApplication
events.
– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
2
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
1
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
1
@GolezTrol you are right thatTApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegatesTApplication
events to everyTApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers toTApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to addTApplicationEvents
to theMainForm
.
– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08
2
2
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
1
1
Including unit
AppEvents
will through unit's initialization create a TMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?) TApplication
events.– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
Including unit
AppEvents
will through unit's initialization create a TMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?) TApplication
events.– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
2
2
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
1
1
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
1
1
@GolezTrol you are right that
TApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegates TApplication
events to every TApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to add TApplicationEvents
to the MainForm
.– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08
@GolezTrol you are right that
TApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegates TApplication
events to every TApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to add TApplicationEvents
to the MainForm
.– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The package in question uses an internal instance of TApplicationEvents
, which is a multicaster that intercepts TApplication
events and delegates them to every TApplicationEvents
instance in the application, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly.
So, to coexist with the package, the solution is to add a TApplicationEvents
to your MainForm
and assign a handler to its OnMessage
event, instead of assigning a handler to the TApplication.OnMessage
event directly.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261689%2fsysutils-loadpackage-replaces-aplication-onmessage-handler%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The package in question uses an internal instance of TApplicationEvents
, which is a multicaster that intercepts TApplication
events and delegates them to every TApplicationEvents
instance in the application, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly.
So, to coexist with the package, the solution is to add a TApplicationEvents
to your MainForm
and assign a handler to its OnMessage
event, instead of assigning a handler to the TApplication.OnMessage
event directly.
add a comment |
The package in question uses an internal instance of TApplicationEvents
, which is a multicaster that intercepts TApplication
events and delegates them to every TApplicationEvents
instance in the application, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly.
So, to coexist with the package, the solution is to add a TApplicationEvents
to your MainForm
and assign a handler to its OnMessage
event, instead of assigning a handler to the TApplication.OnMessage
event directly.
add a comment |
The package in question uses an internal instance of TApplicationEvents
, which is a multicaster that intercepts TApplication
events and delegates them to every TApplicationEvents
instance in the application, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly.
So, to coexist with the package, the solution is to add a TApplicationEvents
to your MainForm
and assign a handler to its OnMessage
event, instead of assigning a handler to the TApplication.OnMessage
event directly.
The package in question uses an internal instance of TApplicationEvents
, which is a multicaster that intercepts TApplication
events and delegates them to every TApplicationEvents
instance in the application, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers to TApplication
directly.
So, to coexist with the package, the solution is to add a TApplicationEvents
to your MainForm
and assign a handler to its OnMessage
event, instead of assigning a handler to the TApplication.OnMessage
event directly.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 6:13
Remy LebeauRemy Lebeau
332k18251443
332k18251443
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261689%2fsysutils-loadpackage-replaces-aplication-onmessage-handler%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
The package implements its own Application.Onmessage handler perhaps? How can we know without knowing what is in either your application or the bpl.
– Dsm
Nov 12 '18 at 12:09
1
Including unit
AppEvents
will through unit's initialization create aTMultiCaster
, which assigns handlers to (some or all?)TApplication
events.– nil
Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
2
Set a breakpoint just after InitControls in vcl.controls.initialization. Run application. When the breakpoint is hit, set a data breakpoint for Application.FOnMessage. Run (resume) again. When the data breakpoint is hit, examine the code.
– Sertac Akyuz
Nov 12 '18 at 13:00
1
That unit contains the TApplicationEvents component, which can be used to assign application events at designtime. Because you could use multiple components, I think the unit attaches its own event handler, which then forwards any events to the event handlers assigned to all the TApplicationEvent components. It would be nice, of course, if it kept track of existing handlers, because if every bpl is going to do the same trick again, that also implies that TApplicationEvents wouldn't work well at all in applications with multiple packages...
– GolezTrol
Nov 12 '18 at 16:01
1
@GolezTrol you are right that
TApplicationEvents
is a multicaster, it delegatesTApplication
events to everyTApplicationEvents
instance, allowing multiple Forms, components, etc to receive the same app events without stepping on each other's toes trying to assign handlers toTApplication
directly. So yes, the solution to the OP's issue is to addTApplicationEvents
to theMainForm
.– Remy Lebeau
Nov 13 '18 at 6:08