Pandas pivot table using custom conditions on the dataframe
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I want to make a pivot table based on custom conditions in the dataframe:
The dataframe looks like this:
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({"Area": ["A", "A", "B", "A", "C", "A", "D", "A"],
"City" : ["X", "Y", "Z", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "X"],
"Condition" : ["Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good", "Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good"],
"Population" : [100,150,50,200,170,390,80,100]
"Pincode" : ["X1", "Y1", "Z1", "P1", "Q1", "R1", "S1", "X2"] })
>>> df
Area City Condition Population Pincode
0 A X Good 100 X1
1 A Y Bad 150 Y1
2 B Z Good 50 Z1
3 A P Good 200 P1
4 C Q Good 170 Q1
5 A R Bad 390 R1
6 D S Good 80 S1
7 A X Good 100 X2
Now I want to pivot the dataframe df
in a manner such that I can see the unique count of cities against each area along with the corresponding count of "Good" cities and also the population of the area.
I expect an output like this:
Area city_count good_city_count Population
A 4 2 940
B 1 1 50
C 1 1 170
D 1 1 80
All 7 5 1240
I can give a dictionary to the aggfunc
parameter but this doesn't give me the city count split between the good cities.
>>> city_count = df.pivot_table(index=["Area"],
values=["City", "Population"],
aggfunc={"City": lambda x: len(x.unique()),
"Population": "sum"},
margins=True)
Area City Population
0 A 4 940
1 B 1 50
2 C 1 170
3 D 1 80
4 All 7 1240
I can merge two different pivot tables - one with the count of cities and the other with the population but this is not scalable for a large dataset with a big aggfunc
dictionary.
python pandas pivot-table
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I want to make a pivot table based on custom conditions in the dataframe:
The dataframe looks like this:
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({"Area": ["A", "A", "B", "A", "C", "A", "D", "A"],
"City" : ["X", "Y", "Z", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "X"],
"Condition" : ["Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good", "Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good"],
"Population" : [100,150,50,200,170,390,80,100]
"Pincode" : ["X1", "Y1", "Z1", "P1", "Q1", "R1", "S1", "X2"] })
>>> df
Area City Condition Population Pincode
0 A X Good 100 X1
1 A Y Bad 150 Y1
2 B Z Good 50 Z1
3 A P Good 200 P1
4 C Q Good 170 Q1
5 A R Bad 390 R1
6 D S Good 80 S1
7 A X Good 100 X2
Now I want to pivot the dataframe df
in a manner such that I can see the unique count of cities against each area along with the corresponding count of "Good" cities and also the population of the area.
I expect an output like this:
Area city_count good_city_count Population
A 4 2 940
B 1 1 50
C 1 1 170
D 1 1 80
All 7 5 1240
I can give a dictionary to the aggfunc
parameter but this doesn't give me the city count split between the good cities.
>>> city_count = df.pivot_table(index=["Area"],
values=["City", "Population"],
aggfunc={"City": lambda x: len(x.unique()),
"Population": "sum"},
margins=True)
Area City Population
0 A 4 940
1 B 1 50
2 C 1 170
3 D 1 80
4 All 7 1240
I can merge two different pivot tables - one with the count of cities and the other with the population but this is not scalable for a large dataset with a big aggfunc
dictionary.
python pandas pivot-table
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I want to make a pivot table based on custom conditions in the dataframe:
The dataframe looks like this:
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({"Area": ["A", "A", "B", "A", "C", "A", "D", "A"],
"City" : ["X", "Y", "Z", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "X"],
"Condition" : ["Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good", "Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good"],
"Population" : [100,150,50,200,170,390,80,100]
"Pincode" : ["X1", "Y1", "Z1", "P1", "Q1", "R1", "S1", "X2"] })
>>> df
Area City Condition Population Pincode
0 A X Good 100 X1
1 A Y Bad 150 Y1
2 B Z Good 50 Z1
3 A P Good 200 P1
4 C Q Good 170 Q1
5 A R Bad 390 R1
6 D S Good 80 S1
7 A X Good 100 X2
Now I want to pivot the dataframe df
in a manner such that I can see the unique count of cities against each area along with the corresponding count of "Good" cities and also the population of the area.
I expect an output like this:
Area city_count good_city_count Population
A 4 2 940
B 1 1 50
C 1 1 170
D 1 1 80
All 7 5 1240
I can give a dictionary to the aggfunc
parameter but this doesn't give me the city count split between the good cities.
>>> city_count = df.pivot_table(index=["Area"],
values=["City", "Population"],
aggfunc={"City": lambda x: len(x.unique()),
"Population": "sum"},
margins=True)
Area City Population
0 A 4 940
1 B 1 50
2 C 1 170
3 D 1 80
4 All 7 1240
I can merge two different pivot tables - one with the count of cities and the other with the population but this is not scalable for a large dataset with a big aggfunc
dictionary.
python pandas pivot-table
New contributor
I want to make a pivot table based on custom conditions in the dataframe:
The dataframe looks like this:
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({"Area": ["A", "A", "B", "A", "C", "A", "D", "A"],
"City" : ["X", "Y", "Z", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "X"],
"Condition" : ["Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good", "Good", "Bad", "Good", "Good"],
"Population" : [100,150,50,200,170,390,80,100]
"Pincode" : ["X1", "Y1", "Z1", "P1", "Q1", "R1", "S1", "X2"] })
>>> df
Area City Condition Population Pincode
0 A X Good 100 X1
1 A Y Bad 150 Y1
2 B Z Good 50 Z1
3 A P Good 200 P1
4 C Q Good 170 Q1
5 A R Bad 390 R1
6 D S Good 80 S1
7 A X Good 100 X2
Now I want to pivot the dataframe df
in a manner such that I can see the unique count of cities against each area along with the corresponding count of "Good" cities and also the population of the area.
I expect an output like this:
Area city_count good_city_count Population
A 4 2 940
B 1 1 50
C 1 1 170
D 1 1 80
All 7 5 1240
I can give a dictionary to the aggfunc
parameter but this doesn't give me the city count split between the good cities.
>>> city_count = df.pivot_table(index=["Area"],
values=["City", "Population"],
aggfunc={"City": lambda x: len(x.unique()),
"Population": "sum"},
margins=True)
Area City Population
0 A 4 940
1 B 1 50
2 C 1 170
3 D 1 80
4 All 7 1240
I can merge two different pivot tables - one with the count of cities and the other with the population but this is not scalable for a large dataset with a big aggfunc
dictionary.
python pandas pivot-table
python pandas pivot-table
New contributor
New contributor
edited Nov 10 at 21:19
New contributor
asked Nov 10 at 13:36
Pratiek Malhotra
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Add new parameters columns
with fill_value
and also is possible use nunique
for aggregate function:
city_count = df.pivot_table(index = "Area",
values = "City",
columns='Condition',
aggfunc = lambda x : x.nunique(),
margins = True,
fill_value=0)
print (city_count)
Condition Bad Good All
Area
A 2 2 4
B 0 1 1
C 0 1 1
D 0 1 1
All 2 5 7
Last if need convert index to column and change columns names:
city_count = city_count.add_suffix('_count').reset_index().rename_axis(None, 1)
print (city_count)
Area Bad_count Good_count All_count
0 A 2 2 4
1 B 0 1 1
2 C 0 1 1
3 D 0 1 1
4 All 2 5 7
EDIT:
d = {'City':'nunique','Population':'sum', 'good_city_count':'nunique'}
d1 = {'City':'city_count','Condition':'good_city_count'}
mask = df["Condition"] == 'Good'
df = (df.assign(good_city_count = lambda x: np.where(mask, x['City'], np.nan))
.groupby('Area')
.agg(d)
.rename(columns=d1))
df = df.append(df.sum().rename('All')).reset_index()
print (df)
Area city_count Population good_city_count
0 A 4 940 2
1 B 1 50 1
2 C 1 170 1
3 D 1 80 1
4 All 7 1240 5
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
Another method without using pivot_table
. Use np.where
with groupby
+agg
:
df['Condition'] = np.where(df['Condition']=='Good', df['City'], np.nan)
df = df.groupby('Area').agg({'City':'nunique', 'Condition':'nunique', 'Population':'sum'})
.rename(columns={'City':'city_count', 'Condition':'good_city_count'})
df.loc['All',:] = df.sum()
df = df.astype(int).reset_index()
print(df)
Area city_count good_city_count Population
0 A 4 2 940
1 B 1 1 50
2 C 1 1 170
3 D 1 1 80
4 All 7 5 1240
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Add new parameters columns
with fill_value
and also is possible use nunique
for aggregate function:
city_count = df.pivot_table(index = "Area",
values = "City",
columns='Condition',
aggfunc = lambda x : x.nunique(),
margins = True,
fill_value=0)
print (city_count)
Condition Bad Good All
Area
A 2 2 4
B 0 1 1
C 0 1 1
D 0 1 1
All 2 5 7
Last if need convert index to column and change columns names:
city_count = city_count.add_suffix('_count').reset_index().rename_axis(None, 1)
print (city_count)
Area Bad_count Good_count All_count
0 A 2 2 4
1 B 0 1 1
2 C 0 1 1
3 D 0 1 1
4 All 2 5 7
EDIT:
d = {'City':'nunique','Population':'sum', 'good_city_count':'nunique'}
d1 = {'City':'city_count','Condition':'good_city_count'}
mask = df["Condition"] == 'Good'
df = (df.assign(good_city_count = lambda x: np.where(mask, x['City'], np.nan))
.groupby('Area')
.agg(d)
.rename(columns=d1))
df = df.append(df.sum().rename('All')).reset_index()
print (df)
Area city_count Population good_city_count
0 A 4 940 2
1 B 1 50 1
2 C 1 170 1
3 D 1 80 1
4 All 7 1240 5
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
Add new parameters columns
with fill_value
and also is possible use nunique
for aggregate function:
city_count = df.pivot_table(index = "Area",
values = "City",
columns='Condition',
aggfunc = lambda x : x.nunique(),
margins = True,
fill_value=0)
print (city_count)
Condition Bad Good All
Area
A 2 2 4
B 0 1 1
C 0 1 1
D 0 1 1
All 2 5 7
Last if need convert index to column and change columns names:
city_count = city_count.add_suffix('_count').reset_index().rename_axis(None, 1)
print (city_count)
Area Bad_count Good_count All_count
0 A 2 2 4
1 B 0 1 1
2 C 0 1 1
3 D 0 1 1
4 All 2 5 7
EDIT:
d = {'City':'nunique','Population':'sum', 'good_city_count':'nunique'}
d1 = {'City':'city_count','Condition':'good_city_count'}
mask = df["Condition"] == 'Good'
df = (df.assign(good_city_count = lambda x: np.where(mask, x['City'], np.nan))
.groupby('Area')
.agg(d)
.rename(columns=d1))
df = df.append(df.sum().rename('All')).reset_index()
print (df)
Area city_count Population good_city_count
0 A 4 940 2
1 B 1 50 1
2 C 1 170 1
3 D 1 80 1
4 All 7 1240 5
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Add new parameters columns
with fill_value
and also is possible use nunique
for aggregate function:
city_count = df.pivot_table(index = "Area",
values = "City",
columns='Condition',
aggfunc = lambda x : x.nunique(),
margins = True,
fill_value=0)
print (city_count)
Condition Bad Good All
Area
A 2 2 4
B 0 1 1
C 0 1 1
D 0 1 1
All 2 5 7
Last if need convert index to column and change columns names:
city_count = city_count.add_suffix('_count').reset_index().rename_axis(None, 1)
print (city_count)
Area Bad_count Good_count All_count
0 A 2 2 4
1 B 0 1 1
2 C 0 1 1
3 D 0 1 1
4 All 2 5 7
EDIT:
d = {'City':'nunique','Population':'sum', 'good_city_count':'nunique'}
d1 = {'City':'city_count','Condition':'good_city_count'}
mask = df["Condition"] == 'Good'
df = (df.assign(good_city_count = lambda x: np.where(mask, x['City'], np.nan))
.groupby('Area')
.agg(d)
.rename(columns=d1))
df = df.append(df.sum().rename('All')).reset_index()
print (df)
Area city_count Population good_city_count
0 A 4 940 2
1 B 1 50 1
2 C 1 170 1
3 D 1 80 1
4 All 7 1240 5
Add new parameters columns
with fill_value
and also is possible use nunique
for aggregate function:
city_count = df.pivot_table(index = "Area",
values = "City",
columns='Condition',
aggfunc = lambda x : x.nunique(),
margins = True,
fill_value=0)
print (city_count)
Condition Bad Good All
Area
A 2 2 4
B 0 1 1
C 0 1 1
D 0 1 1
All 2 5 7
Last if need convert index to column and change columns names:
city_count = city_count.add_suffix('_count').reset_index().rename_axis(None, 1)
print (city_count)
Area Bad_count Good_count All_count
0 A 2 2 4
1 B 0 1 1
2 C 0 1 1
3 D 0 1 1
4 All 2 5 7
EDIT:
d = {'City':'nunique','Population':'sum', 'good_city_count':'nunique'}
d1 = {'City':'city_count','Condition':'good_city_count'}
mask = df["Condition"] == 'Good'
df = (df.assign(good_city_count = lambda x: np.where(mask, x['City'], np.nan))
.groupby('Area')
.agg(d)
.rename(columns=d1))
df = df.append(df.sum().rename('All')).reset_index()
print (df)
Area city_count Population good_city_count
0 A 4 940 2
1 B 1 50 1
2 C 1 170 1
3 D 1 80 1
4 All 7 1240 5
edited Nov 10 at 22:25
answered Nov 10 at 13:40
jezrael
305k20239314
305k20239314
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
|
show 4 more comments
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
1
1
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
This wouldn't give me the total_count of cities against the good_count
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:18
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
@PratiekMalhotra - sorry, you are right. rollback to previous answer.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:20
1
1
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@PratiekMalhotra - If your question was answered, please accept the most helpful answer by clicking the grey check to the left of that answer to toggle it green. It helps the community. Thanks.
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:24
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@jeszrael, In dataframes where I need to aggregate values from multiple columns. I cannot use the "columns" parameter as it would aggregate all the values based on that.
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 14:31
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
@PratiekMalhotra - Can you create minimal, complete, and verifiable example? Because not sure if understand... Thank you
– jezrael
Nov 10 at 14:36
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
Another method without using pivot_table
. Use np.where
with groupby
+agg
:
df['Condition'] = np.where(df['Condition']=='Good', df['City'], np.nan)
df = df.groupby('Area').agg({'City':'nunique', 'Condition':'nunique', 'Population':'sum'})
.rename(columns={'City':'city_count', 'Condition':'good_city_count'})
df.loc['All',:] = df.sum()
df = df.astype(int).reset_index()
print(df)
Area city_count good_city_count Population
0 A 4 2 940
1 B 1 1 50
2 C 1 1 170
3 D 1 1 80
4 All 7 5 1240
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Another method without using pivot_table
. Use np.where
with groupby
+agg
:
df['Condition'] = np.where(df['Condition']=='Good', df['City'], np.nan)
df = df.groupby('Area').agg({'City':'nunique', 'Condition':'nunique', 'Population':'sum'})
.rename(columns={'City':'city_count', 'Condition':'good_city_count'})
df.loc['All',:] = df.sum()
df = df.astype(int).reset_index()
print(df)
Area city_count good_city_count Population
0 A 4 2 940
1 B 1 1 50
2 C 1 1 170
3 D 1 1 80
4 All 7 5 1240
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Another method without using pivot_table
. Use np.where
with groupby
+agg
:
df['Condition'] = np.where(df['Condition']=='Good', df['City'], np.nan)
df = df.groupby('Area').agg({'City':'nunique', 'Condition':'nunique', 'Population':'sum'})
.rename(columns={'City':'city_count', 'Condition':'good_city_count'})
df.loc['All',:] = df.sum()
df = df.astype(int).reset_index()
print(df)
Area city_count good_city_count Population
0 A 4 2 940
1 B 1 1 50
2 C 1 1 170
3 D 1 1 80
4 All 7 5 1240
Another method without using pivot_table
. Use np.where
with groupby
+agg
:
df['Condition'] = np.where(df['Condition']=='Good', df['City'], np.nan)
df = df.groupby('Area').agg({'City':'nunique', 'Condition':'nunique', 'Population':'sum'})
.rename(columns={'City':'city_count', 'Condition':'good_city_count'})
df.loc['All',:] = df.sum()
df = df.astype(int).reset_index()
print(df)
Area city_count good_city_count Population
0 A 4 2 940
1 B 1 1 50
2 C 1 1 170
3 D 1 1 80
4 All 7 5 1240
edited Nov 11 at 2:44
answered Nov 10 at 13:48
Sandeep Kadapa
4,819426
4,819426
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
add a comment |
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
When using this, the good city count will not be unique as it will be summing all the duplicate city appearances for Area as well
– Pratiek Malhotra
Nov 10 at 20:48
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
@PratiekMalhotra Check the update.
– Sandeep Kadapa
Nov 11 at 2:46
add a comment |
Pratiek Malhotra is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pratiek Malhotra is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pratiek Malhotra is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pratiek Malhotra is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239514%2fpandas-pivot-table-using-custom-conditions-on-the-dataframe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password