Correctly implement hashcode for matrix java












0















I have a Java class containing a 2D int array. I want to implement the hashCode() method so that different objects can be compared using their attributes and not reference. This is what I tried:



public int hashCode() {
int hash = 0;
for(int i=0; i<getMatrix().length; i++) {
hash =+ Arrays.hashCode(getMatrix()[i]);
}
return hash;
}


I also tried using deepHashCode() but didn't work. My problem is that when the get() method of a HashMap object is used, even though both the object have the same matrix, the get() method does not work properly.



EDIT:



Implementation of equals method



public boolean equals(Object o) {
boolean sameBoard = false;
if(o != null && o instanceof Node) {
Node node = (Node) o;
int board1 = this.getMatrix();
int board2 = node.getMatrix();
return Arrays.deepEquals(board1, board2);
}
return sameBoard;
}









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

    – Andrey Akhmetov
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:47











  • @AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

    – Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:51






  • 2





    Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:54






  • 3





    Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

    – Andy Turner
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:00






  • 1





    Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:03


















0















I have a Java class containing a 2D int array. I want to implement the hashCode() method so that different objects can be compared using their attributes and not reference. This is what I tried:



public int hashCode() {
int hash = 0;
for(int i=0; i<getMatrix().length; i++) {
hash =+ Arrays.hashCode(getMatrix()[i]);
}
return hash;
}


I also tried using deepHashCode() but didn't work. My problem is that when the get() method of a HashMap object is used, even though both the object have the same matrix, the get() method does not work properly.



EDIT:



Implementation of equals method



public boolean equals(Object o) {
boolean sameBoard = false;
if(o != null && o instanceof Node) {
Node node = (Node) o;
int board1 = this.getMatrix();
int board2 = node.getMatrix();
return Arrays.deepEquals(board1, board2);
}
return sameBoard;
}









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

    – Andrey Akhmetov
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:47











  • @AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

    – Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:51






  • 2





    Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:54






  • 3





    Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

    – Andy Turner
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:00






  • 1





    Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:03
















0












0








0








I have a Java class containing a 2D int array. I want to implement the hashCode() method so that different objects can be compared using their attributes and not reference. This is what I tried:



public int hashCode() {
int hash = 0;
for(int i=0; i<getMatrix().length; i++) {
hash =+ Arrays.hashCode(getMatrix()[i]);
}
return hash;
}


I also tried using deepHashCode() but didn't work. My problem is that when the get() method of a HashMap object is used, even though both the object have the same matrix, the get() method does not work properly.



EDIT:



Implementation of equals method



public boolean equals(Object o) {
boolean sameBoard = false;
if(o != null && o instanceof Node) {
Node node = (Node) o;
int board1 = this.getMatrix();
int board2 = node.getMatrix();
return Arrays.deepEquals(board1, board2);
}
return sameBoard;
}









share|improve this question
















I have a Java class containing a 2D int array. I want to implement the hashCode() method so that different objects can be compared using their attributes and not reference. This is what I tried:



public int hashCode() {
int hash = 0;
for(int i=0; i<getMatrix().length; i++) {
hash =+ Arrays.hashCode(getMatrix()[i]);
}
return hash;
}


I also tried using deepHashCode() but didn't work. My problem is that when the get() method of a HashMap object is used, even though both the object have the same matrix, the get() method does not work properly.



EDIT:



Implementation of equals method



public boolean equals(Object o) {
boolean sameBoard = false;
if(o != null && o instanceof Node) {
Node node = (Node) o;
int board1 = this.getMatrix();
int board2 = node.getMatrix();
return Arrays.deepEquals(board1, board2);
}
return sameBoard;
}






java






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 20:51







Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki

















asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:45









Sebastian Ampuero MorisakiSebastian Ampuero Morisaki

929




929








  • 1





    Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

    – Andrey Akhmetov
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:47











  • @AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

    – Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:51






  • 2





    Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:54






  • 3





    Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

    – Andy Turner
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:00






  • 1





    Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:03
















  • 1





    Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

    – Andrey Akhmetov
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:47











  • @AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

    – Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:51






  • 2





    Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 20:54






  • 3





    Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

    – Andy Turner
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:00






  • 1





    Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 12 '18 at 21:03










1




1





Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

– Andrey Akhmetov
Nov 12 '18 at 20:47





Did you also implement equals? If so, can you also post your implementation of it as an edit to your post?

– Andrey Akhmetov
Nov 12 '18 at 20:47













@AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

– Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
Nov 12 '18 at 20:51





@AndreyAkhmetov i posted it

– Sebastian Ampuero Morisaki
Nov 12 '18 at 20:51




2




2





Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

– JB Nizet
Nov 12 '18 at 20:54





Post a complete minimal example reproducing the problem. We must be able to copy and paste your code in our IDE, compile and run it. My guess is that you modify the matrix after you've stored it in the map.

– JB Nizet
Nov 12 '18 at 20:54




3




3





Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

– Andy Turner
Nov 12 '18 at 21:00





Do you mean +=, rather than =+? As it stands, your hash will simply be the hash of the last... row?

– Andy Turner
Nov 12 '18 at 21:00




1




1





Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

– JB Nizet
Nov 12 '18 at 21:03







Good catch @AndyTurner! That said, that should still work: it's just a weaker hashCode.

– JB Nizet
Nov 12 '18 at 21:03














0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269831%2fcorrectly-implement-hashcode-for-matrix-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269831%2fcorrectly-implement-hashcode-for-matrix-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Coverage of Google Street View

Full-time equivalent

Surfing