How to get code coverage on formula fields in a wrapper class
I need to get code coverage on UpgradeRate, PlusCount2, PremiumCount2 and PrestigeCount2, but what I have is not working. How do I get code coverage on these? In my custom controller, I have the following wrapper class:
public class employee{
public Decimal PlusCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PremiumCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PremiumCount2 {get{if(PremiumCount == 0){return 0;}else return PremiumCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PrestigeCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PrestigeCount2 {get{if(PrestigeCount == 0){return 0;}else return PrestigeCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal UpgradeRate{
get{
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
return 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
return 0;
} else return ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
}
}
public employee(AggregateResult i){
PlusCount = (Decimal)i.get('plus_count');
PremiumCount = (Decimal)i.get('premium_count');
PrestigeCount = (Decimal)i.get('prestige_count');
}
}
I am able to get code coverage for PlusCount, PremiumCount, and PrestigeCount, with the following test class:
List<FranchiseMetrics.employee> employees = new List<FranchiseMetrics.employee>();
AggregateResult employeeInspections = new AggregateResult{};
employeeInspections = [SELECT Count(id) Total,Sum(Number_of_Home_Inspections__c) HomeInspections, AVG(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) AJS, Sum(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) TotalDollars,Sum(Added_Service_Cost__c) ServiceCost,
Sum(Home_Inspection_dollars__c) HomeDollars, Inspector__r.FirstName Name,
Sum(Plus_Sales__c) plus_dollars, Sum(Premium_Sales__c) premium_dollars, Sum(Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_dollars,
Sum(of_Plus_Sales__c) plus_count, Sum(of_Premium_Sales__c) premium_count, Sum(of_Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_count,
Sum(Added_Services__c) addedservices, Sum(Standalones__c) standalones
FROM Inspection__c
WHERE Test_Inspection__c = false AND Status__c = 'Completed' AND Franchise__c =: acct.id
GROUP BY Inspector__r.FirstName
ORDER BY Inspector__r.FirstName];
for(AggregateResult e: employeeInspections){
Decimal UpgradeRate;
Decimal PlusCount = (Decimal)e.get('plus_count');
Decimal PremiumCount = (Decimal)e.get('premium_count');
Decimal PrestigeCount = (Decimal)e.get('prestige_count');
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
UpgradeRate = 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
UpgradeRate = 0;
} else UpgradeRate = ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
employees.add(new FranchiseMetrics.employee(e));
Decimal PlusCount2;
if(PlusCount == 0){PlusCount2 = 0;}else PlusCount2 = PlusCount.setScale(0);
}
code-coverage wrapper-class
add a comment |
I need to get code coverage on UpgradeRate, PlusCount2, PremiumCount2 and PrestigeCount2, but what I have is not working. How do I get code coverage on these? In my custom controller, I have the following wrapper class:
public class employee{
public Decimal PlusCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PremiumCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PremiumCount2 {get{if(PremiumCount == 0){return 0;}else return PremiumCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PrestigeCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PrestigeCount2 {get{if(PrestigeCount == 0){return 0;}else return PrestigeCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal UpgradeRate{
get{
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
return 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
return 0;
} else return ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
}
}
public employee(AggregateResult i){
PlusCount = (Decimal)i.get('plus_count');
PremiumCount = (Decimal)i.get('premium_count');
PrestigeCount = (Decimal)i.get('prestige_count');
}
}
I am able to get code coverage for PlusCount, PremiumCount, and PrestigeCount, with the following test class:
List<FranchiseMetrics.employee> employees = new List<FranchiseMetrics.employee>();
AggregateResult employeeInspections = new AggregateResult{};
employeeInspections = [SELECT Count(id) Total,Sum(Number_of_Home_Inspections__c) HomeInspections, AVG(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) AJS, Sum(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) TotalDollars,Sum(Added_Service_Cost__c) ServiceCost,
Sum(Home_Inspection_dollars__c) HomeDollars, Inspector__r.FirstName Name,
Sum(Plus_Sales__c) plus_dollars, Sum(Premium_Sales__c) premium_dollars, Sum(Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_dollars,
Sum(of_Plus_Sales__c) plus_count, Sum(of_Premium_Sales__c) premium_count, Sum(of_Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_count,
Sum(Added_Services__c) addedservices, Sum(Standalones__c) standalones
FROM Inspection__c
WHERE Test_Inspection__c = false AND Status__c = 'Completed' AND Franchise__c =: acct.id
GROUP BY Inspector__r.FirstName
ORDER BY Inspector__r.FirstName];
for(AggregateResult e: employeeInspections){
Decimal UpgradeRate;
Decimal PlusCount = (Decimal)e.get('plus_count');
Decimal PremiumCount = (Decimal)e.get('premium_count');
Decimal PrestigeCount = (Decimal)e.get('prestige_count');
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
UpgradeRate = 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
UpgradeRate = 0;
} else UpgradeRate = ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
employees.add(new FranchiseMetrics.employee(e));
Decimal PlusCount2;
if(PlusCount == 0){PlusCount2 = 0;}else PlusCount2 = PlusCount.setScale(0);
}
code-coverage wrapper-class
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
Also,public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to justpublic Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08
add a comment |
I need to get code coverage on UpgradeRate, PlusCount2, PremiumCount2 and PrestigeCount2, but what I have is not working. How do I get code coverage on these? In my custom controller, I have the following wrapper class:
public class employee{
public Decimal PlusCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PremiumCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PremiumCount2 {get{if(PremiumCount == 0){return 0;}else return PremiumCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PrestigeCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PrestigeCount2 {get{if(PrestigeCount == 0){return 0;}else return PrestigeCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal UpgradeRate{
get{
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
return 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
return 0;
} else return ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
}
}
public employee(AggregateResult i){
PlusCount = (Decimal)i.get('plus_count');
PremiumCount = (Decimal)i.get('premium_count');
PrestigeCount = (Decimal)i.get('prestige_count');
}
}
I am able to get code coverage for PlusCount, PremiumCount, and PrestigeCount, with the following test class:
List<FranchiseMetrics.employee> employees = new List<FranchiseMetrics.employee>();
AggregateResult employeeInspections = new AggregateResult{};
employeeInspections = [SELECT Count(id) Total,Sum(Number_of_Home_Inspections__c) HomeInspections, AVG(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) AJS, Sum(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) TotalDollars,Sum(Added_Service_Cost__c) ServiceCost,
Sum(Home_Inspection_dollars__c) HomeDollars, Inspector__r.FirstName Name,
Sum(Plus_Sales__c) plus_dollars, Sum(Premium_Sales__c) premium_dollars, Sum(Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_dollars,
Sum(of_Plus_Sales__c) plus_count, Sum(of_Premium_Sales__c) premium_count, Sum(of_Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_count,
Sum(Added_Services__c) addedservices, Sum(Standalones__c) standalones
FROM Inspection__c
WHERE Test_Inspection__c = false AND Status__c = 'Completed' AND Franchise__c =: acct.id
GROUP BY Inspector__r.FirstName
ORDER BY Inspector__r.FirstName];
for(AggregateResult e: employeeInspections){
Decimal UpgradeRate;
Decimal PlusCount = (Decimal)e.get('plus_count');
Decimal PremiumCount = (Decimal)e.get('premium_count');
Decimal PrestigeCount = (Decimal)e.get('prestige_count');
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
UpgradeRate = 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
UpgradeRate = 0;
} else UpgradeRate = ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
employees.add(new FranchiseMetrics.employee(e));
Decimal PlusCount2;
if(PlusCount == 0){PlusCount2 = 0;}else PlusCount2 = PlusCount.setScale(0);
}
code-coverage wrapper-class
I need to get code coverage on UpgradeRate, PlusCount2, PremiumCount2 and PrestigeCount2, but what I have is not working. How do I get code coverage on these? In my custom controller, I have the following wrapper class:
public class employee{
public Decimal PlusCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PremiumCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PremiumCount2 {get{if(PremiumCount == 0){return 0;}else return PremiumCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal PrestigeCount{get;set;}
public Decimal PrestigeCount2 {get{if(PrestigeCount == 0){return 0;}else return PrestigeCount.setScale(0);}}
public Decimal UpgradeRate{
get{
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
return 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
return 0;
} else return ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
}
}
public employee(AggregateResult i){
PlusCount = (Decimal)i.get('plus_count');
PremiumCount = (Decimal)i.get('premium_count');
PrestigeCount = (Decimal)i.get('prestige_count');
}
}
I am able to get code coverage for PlusCount, PremiumCount, and PrestigeCount, with the following test class:
List<FranchiseMetrics.employee> employees = new List<FranchiseMetrics.employee>();
AggregateResult employeeInspections = new AggregateResult{};
employeeInspections = [SELECT Count(id) Total,Sum(Number_of_Home_Inspections__c) HomeInspections, AVG(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) AJS, Sum(Invoice_Sub_Total__c) TotalDollars,Sum(Added_Service_Cost__c) ServiceCost,
Sum(Home_Inspection_dollars__c) HomeDollars, Inspector__r.FirstName Name,
Sum(Plus_Sales__c) plus_dollars, Sum(Premium_Sales__c) premium_dollars, Sum(Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_dollars,
Sum(of_Plus_Sales__c) plus_count, Sum(of_Premium_Sales__c) premium_count, Sum(of_Prestige_Sales__c) prestige_count,
Sum(Added_Services__c) addedservices, Sum(Standalones__c) standalones
FROM Inspection__c
WHERE Test_Inspection__c = false AND Status__c = 'Completed' AND Franchise__c =: acct.id
GROUP BY Inspector__r.FirstName
ORDER BY Inspector__r.FirstName];
for(AggregateResult e: employeeInspections){
Decimal UpgradeRate;
Decimal PlusCount = (Decimal)e.get('plus_count');
Decimal PremiumCount = (Decimal)e.get('premium_count');
Decimal PrestigeCount = (Decimal)e.get('prestige_count');
if(PlusCount == 0 &&(PrestigeCount != 0 || PremiumCount != 0)){
UpgradeRate = 100;
} else if(PlusCount == 0 && PrestigeCount == 0 && PremiumCount == 0){
UpgradeRate = 0;
} else UpgradeRate = ((PremiumCount + PrestigeCount) / (PremiumCount + PrestigeCount + PlusCount)).setScale(3) * 100;
employees.add(new FranchiseMetrics.employee(e));
Decimal PlusCount2;
if(PlusCount == 0){PlusCount2 = 0;}else PlusCount2 = PlusCount.setScale(0);
}
code-coverage wrapper-class
code-coverage wrapper-class
asked Nov 11 at 16:44
Sebastian
415
415
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
Also,public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to justpublic Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08
add a comment |
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
Also,public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to justpublic Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
Also,
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to just public Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08
Also,
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to just public Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You get coverage the same way you get coverage for any other line of code.
Execute the code you want to test by setting up the test environment appropriately.
You can (and probably should) have more than one test method in a unit test class, and testing if/else branches falls very nicely into this pattern (one test method to test the if block, another test method to test the else block).
A barebones example:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
// To test the if block, we need plusCount to be 0 and prestigeCount to be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
emp.prestigeCount = 1;
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
System.assertEquals(100, upgradeRate, 'upgrade rate is not what we expected');
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElseIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else if block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be 0
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElse(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 1;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
add a comment |
get
and set
properties in apex code are rough equivalents of get<VariableName>()
and set<VariableName>()
.
In order to cover them in a unit test, you need to implicitly run these getters/setters.
E.g. for UpgradeRate
variable:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRate(){
Employee testingEmployee = new Employee();
//cover set
testingEmployee.UpgradeRate = 0;
//cover get
System.assertEquals(<your_expected_value>, testingEmployee.UpgradeRate);
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238975%2fhow-to-get-code-coverage-on-formula-fields-in-a-wrapper-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You get coverage the same way you get coverage for any other line of code.
Execute the code you want to test by setting up the test environment appropriately.
You can (and probably should) have more than one test method in a unit test class, and testing if/else branches falls very nicely into this pattern (one test method to test the if block, another test method to test the else block).
A barebones example:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
// To test the if block, we need plusCount to be 0 and prestigeCount to be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
emp.prestigeCount = 1;
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
System.assertEquals(100, upgradeRate, 'upgrade rate is not what we expected');
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElseIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else if block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be 0
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElse(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 1;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
add a comment |
You get coverage the same way you get coverage for any other line of code.
Execute the code you want to test by setting up the test environment appropriately.
You can (and probably should) have more than one test method in a unit test class, and testing if/else branches falls very nicely into this pattern (one test method to test the if block, another test method to test the else block).
A barebones example:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
// To test the if block, we need plusCount to be 0 and prestigeCount to be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
emp.prestigeCount = 1;
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
System.assertEquals(100, upgradeRate, 'upgrade rate is not what we expected');
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElseIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else if block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be 0
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElse(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 1;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
add a comment |
You get coverage the same way you get coverage for any other line of code.
Execute the code you want to test by setting up the test environment appropriately.
You can (and probably should) have more than one test method in a unit test class, and testing if/else branches falls very nicely into this pattern (one test method to test the if block, another test method to test the else block).
A barebones example:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
// To test the if block, we need plusCount to be 0 and prestigeCount to be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
emp.prestigeCount = 1;
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
System.assertEquals(100, upgradeRate, 'upgrade rate is not what we expected');
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElseIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else if block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be 0
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElse(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 1;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
You get coverage the same way you get coverage for any other line of code.
Execute the code you want to test by setting up the test environment appropriately.
You can (and probably should) have more than one test method in a unit test class, and testing if/else branches falls very nicely into this pattern (one test method to test the if block, another test method to test the else block).
A barebones example:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
// To test the if block, we need plusCount to be 0 and prestigeCount to be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
emp.prestigeCount = 1;
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
System.assertEquals(100, upgradeRate, 'upgrade rate is not what we expected');
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElseIf(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else if block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be 0
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 0;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRateElse(){
// someRecord needs to be generated/created sometime before this point in the test.
// Leaving that as an exercise for the reader
FranciseMetrics.Employee emp = FranciseMetrics.Employee(someRecord);
/* N.B. This part of the test setup has changed from the first test*/
// To test the else block, we need plusCount, prestigeCount, and premiumCount
// to all be non-zero
// We can do this because these properties are public
emp.plusCount = 1;
// ...and set the other variables appropriately
Test.startTest();
Integer upgradeRate = emp.upgradeRate;
Test.stopTest();
// Don't forget to make assertion(s)!
// Assertions are what make unit tests truly useful to us programmers.
}
edited Nov 11 at 17:13
answered Nov 11 at 17:05
Derek F
19k31849
19k31849
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
add a comment |
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
Thank you this was helpful. What works is this: FranchiseMetrics.employee emp = employees[0]; emp.plusCount = 0; emp.PrestigeCount = 1; Decimal UpgradeRate = emp.UpgradeRate; Decimal PlusCount2 = emp.PlusCount2;
– Sebastian
Nov 11 at 17:26
add a comment |
get
and set
properties in apex code are rough equivalents of get<VariableName>()
and set<VariableName>()
.
In order to cover them in a unit test, you need to implicitly run these getters/setters.
E.g. for UpgradeRate
variable:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRate(){
Employee testingEmployee = new Employee();
//cover set
testingEmployee.UpgradeRate = 0;
//cover get
System.assertEquals(<your_expected_value>, testingEmployee.UpgradeRate);
}
add a comment |
get
and set
properties in apex code are rough equivalents of get<VariableName>()
and set<VariableName>()
.
In order to cover them in a unit test, you need to implicitly run these getters/setters.
E.g. for UpgradeRate
variable:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRate(){
Employee testingEmployee = new Employee();
//cover set
testingEmployee.UpgradeRate = 0;
//cover get
System.assertEquals(<your_expected_value>, testingEmployee.UpgradeRate);
}
add a comment |
get
and set
properties in apex code are rough equivalents of get<VariableName>()
and set<VariableName>()
.
In order to cover them in a unit test, you need to implicitly run these getters/setters.
E.g. for UpgradeRate
variable:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRate(){
Employee testingEmployee = new Employee();
//cover set
testingEmployee.UpgradeRate = 0;
//cover get
System.assertEquals(<your_expected_value>, testingEmployee.UpgradeRate);
}
get
and set
properties in apex code are rough equivalents of get<VariableName>()
and set<VariableName>()
.
In order to cover them in a unit test, you need to implicitly run these getters/setters.
E.g. for UpgradeRate
variable:
@isTest
static void testUpgradeRate(){
Employee testingEmployee = new Employee();
//cover set
testingEmployee.UpgradeRate = 0;
//cover get
System.assertEquals(<your_expected_value>, testingEmployee.UpgradeRate);
}
answered Nov 11 at 17:17
Alex Fisher
686
686
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238975%2fhow-to-get-code-coverage-on-formula-fields-in-a-wrapper-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
One rarely tests a wrapper class directly. Your main test should test the results of whatever uses this wrapper class. You shouldn't be trying to induce coverage on the wrapper class directly.
– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:06
Also,
public Decimal PlusCount2 {get{if(PlusCount == 0){return 0;}else return PlusCount.setScale(0);}}
is inefficient as compared to justpublic Decimal PlusCount2 { get { return PlusCount.setScale(0); } }
.– sfdcfox
Nov 11 at 17:08