Does the consistance of collections in a graph in ArangoDB guaranteed?
Let say I have a collection node N and a edges collection E. Together , I created a graph G from N and E. In the document, Arango guarantee the consistency of graph G such as no dangling edges when nodes are deleted, etc. Does this consistency hold in situations such as:
- Used Foxx, delete 1 node (Thus making edges have 1 null in the _from and _to)
- Used Foxx, delete nodes using collection API (not using AQL)
- Used AQL, delete directly in nodes/edges collection without traversal
I asked this question due to the fact that my query does return some null value of nodes and I would like to understand more about this topic for inspection.
arangodb aql foxx
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
add a comment |
Let say I have a collection node N and a edges collection E. Together , I created a graph G from N and E. In the document, Arango guarantee the consistency of graph G such as no dangling edges when nodes are deleted, etc. Does this consistency hold in situations such as:
- Used Foxx, delete 1 node (Thus making edges have 1 null in the _from and _to)
- Used Foxx, delete nodes using collection API (not using AQL)
- Used AQL, delete directly in nodes/edges collection without traversal
I asked this question due to the fact that my query does return some null value of nodes and I would like to understand more about this topic for inspection.
arangodb aql foxx
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
add a comment |
Let say I have a collection node N and a edges collection E. Together , I created a graph G from N and E. In the document, Arango guarantee the consistency of graph G such as no dangling edges when nodes are deleted, etc. Does this consistency hold in situations such as:
- Used Foxx, delete 1 node (Thus making edges have 1 null in the _from and _to)
- Used Foxx, delete nodes using collection API (not using AQL)
- Used AQL, delete directly in nodes/edges collection without traversal
I asked this question due to the fact that my query does return some null value of nodes and I would like to understand more about this topic for inspection.
arangodb aql foxx
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
Let say I have a collection node N and a edges collection E. Together , I created a graph G from N and E. In the document, Arango guarantee the consistency of graph G such as no dangling edges when nodes are deleted, etc. Does this consistency hold in situations such as:
- Used Foxx, delete 1 node (Thus making edges have 1 null in the _from and _to)
- Used Foxx, delete nodes using collection API (not using AQL)
- Used AQL, delete directly in nodes/edges collection without traversal
I asked this question due to the fact that my query does return some null value of nodes and I would like to understand more about this topic for inspection.
arangodb aql foxx
arangodb aql foxx
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
asked Nov 12 '18 at 11:37
Loredra LLoredra L
582718
582718
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Incoming and outgoing edges of a vertex are removed together with the vertex if you use the Graph API. You can use the General Graph module in Foxx and arangosh. Some drivers provide wrappers for this Graph API. The General Graph HTTP API is called Gharial.
If you remove vertices by other means, like a db or collection object in Foxx or arangosh, through the Web UI, with AQL or via HTTP endpoints for like DELETE /_api/document/{document-handle}, then you need to delete connected edges yourself or accept dangling edges.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261347%2fdoes-the-consistance-of-collections-in-a-graph-in-arangodb-guaranteed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Incoming and outgoing edges of a vertex are removed together with the vertex if you use the Graph API. You can use the General Graph module in Foxx and arangosh. Some drivers provide wrappers for this Graph API. The General Graph HTTP API is called Gharial.
If you remove vertices by other means, like a db or collection object in Foxx or arangosh, through the Web UI, with AQL or via HTTP endpoints for like DELETE /_api/document/{document-handle}, then you need to delete connected edges yourself or accept dangling edges.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
add a comment |
Incoming and outgoing edges of a vertex are removed together with the vertex if you use the Graph API. You can use the General Graph module in Foxx and arangosh. Some drivers provide wrappers for this Graph API. The General Graph HTTP API is called Gharial.
If you remove vertices by other means, like a db or collection object in Foxx or arangosh, through the Web UI, with AQL or via HTTP endpoints for like DELETE /_api/document/{document-handle}, then you need to delete connected edges yourself or accept dangling edges.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
add a comment |
Incoming and outgoing edges of a vertex are removed together with the vertex if you use the Graph API. You can use the General Graph module in Foxx and arangosh. Some drivers provide wrappers for this Graph API. The General Graph HTTP API is called Gharial.
If you remove vertices by other means, like a db or collection object in Foxx or arangosh, through the Web UI, with AQL or via HTTP endpoints for like DELETE /_api/document/{document-handle}, then you need to delete connected edges yourself or accept dangling edges.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
Incoming and outgoing edges of a vertex are removed together with the vertex if you use the Graph API. You can use the General Graph module in Foxx and arangosh. Some drivers provide wrappers for this Graph API. The General Graph HTTP API is called Gharial.
If you remove vertices by other means, like a db or collection object in Foxx or arangosh, through the Web UI, with AQL or via HTTP endpoints for like DELETE /_api/document/{document-handle}, then you need to delete connected edges yourself or accept dangling edges.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
answered Nov 12 '18 at 14:42
CoDEmanXCoDEmanX
5,82822941
5,82822941
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261347%2fdoes-the-consistance-of-collections-in-a-graph-in-arangodb-guaranteed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
