Camera Pose Estimation - Camera characteristics that affect the marker detection












0















I'am studying the problem of camera pose estimation in particular using ArUco marker and a monocular camera.

The documentations of ArUco and OpenCV are almost perfect, so the problem is not the algorithm itself.

My problem is the camera and its choice.

I need to understand (maybe by a scientific analysis) which camera parameters (eg. focal length, camera aperture, resolution, megapixels, etc.) are most influencing the precision and accuracy of the system, in particular since i have to reach a sub-millimetric accuracy of the detection.

There are many study in which this result is reached (for example this study about a dodecapen), but they use an expensive camera and don't explain the camera features that are more important than others.

So, i can say important camera features for object detection (and pose estimation) are:




  • Intrinsic parameters (focal length, principal point, skew etc.) estimated with the calibration

  • Lens distortion factors


Moreover, my problem is a detection problem (I've only a photo) and not a tracking problem, even if there are advantages of tracking.



I would like to know for example if the camera of an Ipad is usable for my purposes: I know that there are many augmented reality works (using for example ARKit) on Ipad and Iphone, but what allow me to say that I can use an Ipad to reach a submilllimetric accuracy? ( i know that the response could be "trying the camera in your system"... but i need to prove this thing by a theoretical point of view..).



which parameters do I need to consider to choose the camera?

How can i say (without really use it) that a camera is or is not good?

Do you know any articles, papers or other publications that can help me?



Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question

























  • I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

    – Ali Kanat
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:30
















0















I'am studying the problem of camera pose estimation in particular using ArUco marker and a monocular camera.

The documentations of ArUco and OpenCV are almost perfect, so the problem is not the algorithm itself.

My problem is the camera and its choice.

I need to understand (maybe by a scientific analysis) which camera parameters (eg. focal length, camera aperture, resolution, megapixels, etc.) are most influencing the precision and accuracy of the system, in particular since i have to reach a sub-millimetric accuracy of the detection.

There are many study in which this result is reached (for example this study about a dodecapen), but they use an expensive camera and don't explain the camera features that are more important than others.

So, i can say important camera features for object detection (and pose estimation) are:




  • Intrinsic parameters (focal length, principal point, skew etc.) estimated with the calibration

  • Lens distortion factors


Moreover, my problem is a detection problem (I've only a photo) and not a tracking problem, even if there are advantages of tracking.



I would like to know for example if the camera of an Ipad is usable for my purposes: I know that there are many augmented reality works (using for example ARKit) on Ipad and Iphone, but what allow me to say that I can use an Ipad to reach a submilllimetric accuracy? ( i know that the response could be "trying the camera in your system"... but i need to prove this thing by a theoretical point of view..).



which parameters do I need to consider to choose the camera?

How can i say (without really use it) that a camera is or is not good?

Do you know any articles, papers or other publications that can help me?



Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question

























  • I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

    – Ali Kanat
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:30














0












0








0








I'am studying the problem of camera pose estimation in particular using ArUco marker and a monocular camera.

The documentations of ArUco and OpenCV are almost perfect, so the problem is not the algorithm itself.

My problem is the camera and its choice.

I need to understand (maybe by a scientific analysis) which camera parameters (eg. focal length, camera aperture, resolution, megapixels, etc.) are most influencing the precision and accuracy of the system, in particular since i have to reach a sub-millimetric accuracy of the detection.

There are many study in which this result is reached (for example this study about a dodecapen), but they use an expensive camera and don't explain the camera features that are more important than others.

So, i can say important camera features for object detection (and pose estimation) are:




  • Intrinsic parameters (focal length, principal point, skew etc.) estimated with the calibration

  • Lens distortion factors


Moreover, my problem is a detection problem (I've only a photo) and not a tracking problem, even if there are advantages of tracking.



I would like to know for example if the camera of an Ipad is usable for my purposes: I know that there are many augmented reality works (using for example ARKit) on Ipad and Iphone, but what allow me to say that I can use an Ipad to reach a submilllimetric accuracy? ( i know that the response could be "trying the camera in your system"... but i need to prove this thing by a theoretical point of view..).



which parameters do I need to consider to choose the camera?

How can i say (without really use it) that a camera is or is not good?

Do you know any articles, papers or other publications that can help me?



Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question
















I'am studying the problem of camera pose estimation in particular using ArUco marker and a monocular camera.

The documentations of ArUco and OpenCV are almost perfect, so the problem is not the algorithm itself.

My problem is the camera and its choice.

I need to understand (maybe by a scientific analysis) which camera parameters (eg. focal length, camera aperture, resolution, megapixels, etc.) are most influencing the precision and accuracy of the system, in particular since i have to reach a sub-millimetric accuracy of the detection.

There are many study in which this result is reached (for example this study about a dodecapen), but they use an expensive camera and don't explain the camera features that are more important than others.

So, i can say important camera features for object detection (and pose estimation) are:




  • Intrinsic parameters (focal length, principal point, skew etc.) estimated with the calibration

  • Lens distortion factors


Moreover, my problem is a detection problem (I've only a photo) and not a tracking problem, even if there are advantages of tracking.



I would like to know for example if the camera of an Ipad is usable for my purposes: I know that there are many augmented reality works (using for example ARKit) on Ipad and Iphone, but what allow me to say that I can use an Ipad to reach a submilllimetric accuracy? ( i know that the response could be "trying the camera in your system"... but i need to prove this thing by a theoretical point of view..).



which parameters do I need to consider to choose the camera?

How can i say (without really use it) that a camera is or is not good?

Do you know any articles, papers or other publications that can help me?



Thanks a lot!







opencv ipad camera augmented-reality aruco






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 13 '18 at 16:15









Ali Kanat

592216




592216










asked Nov 12 '18 at 14:59









fabridiguafabridigua

134




134













  • I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

    – Ali Kanat
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:30



















  • I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

    – Ali Kanat
    Nov 13 '18 at 15:30

















I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 '18 at 15:30





I am not an expert about opencv but if you are not considering tracking augmented reality solutions are useless for your case. They are already not accurate about tracking and without motion they cant detect objects at all.

– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 '18 at 15:30












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53264812%2fcamera-pose-estimation-camera-characteristics-that-affect-the-marker-detection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53264812%2fcamera-pose-estimation-camera-characteristics-that-affect-the-marker-detection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

Bicuculline

さくらももこ