How can I specify a branch/tag when adding a Git submodule?
How does git submodule add -b
work?
After adding a submodule with a specific branch, a new cloned repository (after git submodule update --init
) will be at a specific commit, not the branch itself (git status
on the submodule shows "Not currently on any branch").
I can't find any information on .gitmodules
or .git/config
about the submodule's branch or any specific commit, so how does Git figure it out?
Also, is it possible to specify a tag instead of a branch?
I'm using version 1.6.5.2.
git git-submodules
add a comment |
How does git submodule add -b
work?
After adding a submodule with a specific branch, a new cloned repository (after git submodule update --init
) will be at a specific commit, not the branch itself (git status
on the submodule shows "Not currently on any branch").
I can't find any information on .gitmodules
or .git/config
about the submodule's branch or any specific commit, so how does Git figure it out?
Also, is it possible to specify a tag instead of a branch?
I'm using version 1.6.5.2.
git git-submodules
2
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00
add a comment |
How does git submodule add -b
work?
After adding a submodule with a specific branch, a new cloned repository (after git submodule update --init
) will be at a specific commit, not the branch itself (git status
on the submodule shows "Not currently on any branch").
I can't find any information on .gitmodules
or .git/config
about the submodule's branch or any specific commit, so how does Git figure it out?
Also, is it possible to specify a tag instead of a branch?
I'm using version 1.6.5.2.
git git-submodules
How does git submodule add -b
work?
After adding a submodule with a specific branch, a new cloned repository (after git submodule update --init
) will be at a specific commit, not the branch itself (git status
on the submodule shows "Not currently on any branch").
I can't find any information on .gitmodules
or .git/config
about the submodule's branch or any specific commit, so how does Git figure it out?
Also, is it possible to specify a tag instead of a branch?
I'm using version 1.6.5.2.
git git-submodules
git git-submodules
edited Nov 6 '18 at 16:20
Fabio Turati
2,55752138
2,55752138
asked Nov 22 '09 at 4:55
Ivan
26.3k144353
26.3k144353
2
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00
add a comment |
2
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00
2
2
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00
add a comment |
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
Note: Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches. See some of the answers below.
It's a little confusing to get used to this, but submodules are not on a branch. They are, like you say, just a pointer to a particular commit of the submodule's repository.
This means, when someone else checks out your repository, or pulls your code, and does git submodule update, the submodule is checked out to that particular commit.
This is great for a submodule that does not change often, because then everyone on the project can have the submodule at the same commit.
If you want to move the submodule to a particular tag:
cd submodule_directory
git checkout v1.0
cd ..
git add submodule_directory
git commit -m "moved submodule to v1.0"
git push
Then, another developer who wants to have submodule_directory changed to that tag, does this
git pull
git submodule update
git pull
changes which commit their submodule directory points to. git submodule update
actually merges in the new code.
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yieldsfatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as ifgit
will only operate on the parent repository.
– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
Isgit checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?
– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
|
show 4 more comments
I'd like to add an answer here that is really just a conglomerate of other answers, but I think it may be more complete.
You know you have a Git submodule when you have these two things.
Your
.gitmodules
has an entry like so:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
You have a submodule object (named SubmoduleTestRepo in this example) in your Git repository. GitHub shows these as "submodule" objects. Or do
git submodule status
from a command line. Git submodule objects are special kinds of Git objects, and they hold the SHA information for a specific commit.
Whenever you do a
git submodule update
, it will populate your submodule with content from the commit. It knows where to find the commit because of the information in the.gitmodules
.
Now, all the
-b
does is add one line in your.gitmodules
file. So following the same example it would look like this:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
branch = master
EDIT: only branch name is supported above, not SHA or TAG.
The submodule object is still pointing at a specific commit. The only thing that the
-b
option buys you is the ability to add a--remote
flag to your update as per Vogella's answer:
git submodule update --remote
Instead of populating the content of the submodule to the commit pointed to by the submodule, it replaces that commit with the latest commit on the master branch, THEN it populates the submodule with that commit. This can be done in two steps by djacobs7 answer. Since you have now updated the commit the submodule object is pointing to, you have to commit the changed submodule object into your Git repository.
git submodule add -b
is not some magically way to keep everything up to date with a branch. It is simply adds information about a branch in the.gitmodules
file and gives you the option to update the submodule object to the latest commit of a specified branch before populating it.
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my.gitmodules
and after doing$ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error sayingfatal: Needed a single revision
andUnable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in.gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?
– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in.gitmodules
and rangit submodule update
and nothing happened?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
|
show 11 more comments
Note that if you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, then (if you have git 1.8.2+):
Make sure the parent repo knows that its submodule now tracks a branch:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.<path>.branch <branch>
Make sure your submodule is actually at the latest of that branch:
cd path/to/your/submodule
git checkout -b branch --track origin/branch
# if the master branch already exist:
git branch -u origin/master master
(with 'origin' being the name of the upstream remote repo the submodule has been cloned from.
A git remote -v
inside that submodule will display it. Usually, it is 'origin')
Don't forget to record the new state of your submodule in your parent repo:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git add path/to/your/submodule
git commit -m "Make submodule tracking a branch"
Subsequent update for that submodule will have to use the
--remote
option:
# update your submodule
# --remote will also fetch and ensure that
# the latest commit from the branch is used
git submodule update --remote
# to avoid fetching use
git submodule update --remote --no-fetch
Note that with Git 2.10+ (Q3 2016), you can use '.
' as a branch name:
The name of the branch is recorded as
submodule.<name>.branch
in.gitmodules
forupdate --remote
.
A special value of.
is used to indicate that the name of the branch in the submodule should be the same name as the current branch in the current repository.
If you want to update all your submodules following a branch:
git submodule update --recursive --remote
Note that the result, for each updated submodule, will almost always be a detached HEAD, as Dan Cameron note in his answer.
(Clintm notes in the comments that, if you run git submodule update --remote
and the resulting sha1 is the same as the branch the submodule is currently on, it won't do anything and leave the submodule still "on that branch" and not in detached head state.)
To ensure the branch is actually checked out (and that won't modify the SHA1 of the special entry representing the submodule for the parent repo), he suggests:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Each submodule will still reference the same SHA1, but if you do make new commits, you will be able to push them because they will be referenced by the branch you want the submodule to track.
After that push within a submodule, don't forget to go back to the parent repo, add, commit and push the new SHA1 for those modified submodules.
Note the use of $toplevel
, recommended in the comments by Alexander Pogrebnyak.$toplevel
was introduced in git1.7.2 in May 2010: commit f030c96.
it contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules
is).
dtmland
adds in the comments:
The foreach script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch.
However, this command gives you both:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
The same command but easier to read:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)";
[ "$branch" = "" ] &&
git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
umläute refines dtmland's command with a simplified version in the comments:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
multiple lines:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'git checkout
$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
Theforeach
script will not depend on the hardcoded<path>
, if you substitute<path>
with$toplevel/
.
– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
Theforeach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:git submodule update --remote --merge
orgit submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.
– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
|
show 9 more comments
Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches.
# add submodule to track master branch
git submodule add -b master [URL to Git repo];
# update your submodule
git submodule update --remote
See also Git submodules
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on.gitmodules
file?
– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
You can lock to a tag withgit submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the linebranch = tags/<sometag>
in.gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
|
show 1 more comment
An example of how I use Git submodules.
- Create a new repository
- Then clone another repository as a submodule
- Then we have that submodule use a tag called V3.1.2
- And then we commit.
And that looks a little bit like this:
git init
vi README
git add README
git commit
git submodule add git://github.com/XXXXX/xxx.yyyy.git stm32_std_lib
git status
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd stm32_std_lib/
git reset --hard V3.1.2
cd ..
git commit -a
git submodule status
Maybe it helps (even though I use a tag and not a branch)?
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
Should you be able to commit a change after yourgit reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with agit status
of the parent directory.
– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
add a comment |
In my experience switching branches in the superproject or future checkouts will still cause detached HEADs of submodules regardless if the submodule is properly added and tracked (i.e. @djacobs7 and @Johnny Z answers).
And instead of manually checking out the correct branch manually or through a script git submodule foreach can be used.
This will check the submodule config file for the branch property and checkout the set branch.
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f <path>.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
add a comment |
Git submodules are a little bit strange - they're always in "detached head" mode - they don't update to the latest commit on a branch like you might expect.
This does make some sense when you think about it, though. Let's say I create repository foo with submodule bar. I push my changes and tell you to check out commit a7402be from repository foo.
Then imagine that someone commits a change to repository bar before you can make your clone.
When you check out commit a7402be from repository foo, you expect to get the same code I pushed. That's why submodules don't update until you tell them to explicitly and then make a new commit.
Personally I think submodules are the most confusing part of Git. There are lots of places that can explain submodules better than I can. I recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon.
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclarkgit clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D
– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
add a comment |
To switch branch for a submodule (assuming you already have the submodule as part of the repository):
cd
to root of your repository containing the submodules- Open
.gitmodules
for editing - Add line below
path = ...
andurl = ...
that saysbranch = your-branch
, for each submodule; save file.gitmodules
. - then without changing directory do
$ git submodule update --remote
...this should pull in the latest commits on the specified branch, for each submodule thus modified.
add a comment |
I have this in my .gitconfig file. It is still a draft, but proved useful as of now. It helps me to always reattach the submodules to their branch.
[alias]
######################
#
#Submodules aliases
#
######################
#git sm-trackbranch : places all submodules on their respective branch specified in .gitmodules
#This works if submodules are configured to track a branch, i.e if .gitmodules looks like :
#[submodule "my-submodule"]
# path = my-submodule
# url = git@wherever.you.like/my-submodule.git
# branch = my-branch
sm-trackbranch = "! git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'"
#sm-pullrebase :
# - pull --rebase on the master repo
# - sm-trackbranch on every submodule
# - pull --rebase on each submodule
#
# Important note :
#- have a clean master repo and subrepos before doing this !
#- this is *not* equivalent to getting the last committed
# master repo + its submodules: if some submodules are tracking branches
# that have evolved since the last commit in the master repo,
# they will be using those more recent commits !
#
# (Note : On the contrary, git submodule update will stick
#to the last committed SHA1 in the master repo)
#
sm-pullrebase = "! git pull --rebase; git submodule update; git sm-trackbranch ; git submodule foreach 'git pull --rebase' "
# git sm-diff will diff the master repo *and* its submodules
sm-diff = "! git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff' "
#git sm-push will ask to push also submodules
sm-push = push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
#git alias : list all aliases
#useful in order to learn git syntax
alias = "!git config -l | grep alias | cut -c 7-"
add a comment |
We use Quack to pull a specific module from another Git repository. We need to pull code without the whole code base of the provided repository - we need a very specific module / file from that huge repository and should be updated every time we run update.
So we achieved it in this way:
Create configuration
name: Project Name
modules:
local/path:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
path: repo/path
branch: dev
other/local/path/filename.txt:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
hexsha: 9e3e9642cfea36f4ae216d27df100134920143b9
path: repo/path/filename.txt
profiles:
init:
tasks: ['modules']
With the above configuration, it creates one directory from the provided GitHub repository as specified in first module configuration, and the other one is to pull and create a file from the given repository.
Other developers just need to run
$ quack
And it pulls the code from the above configurations.
add a comment |
The only effect of choosing a branch for a submodule is that, whenever you pass the --remote
option in the git submodule update
command line, Git will check out in detached HEAD mode (if the default --checkout
behavior is selected) the latest commit of that selected remote branch.
You must be particularly careful when using this remote branch tracking feature for Git submodules if you work with shallow clones of submodules.
The branch you choose for this purpose in submodule settings IS NOT the one that will be cloned during git submodule update --remote
.
If you pass also the --depth
parameter and you do not instruct Git about which branch you want to clone -- and actually you cannot in the git submodule update
command line!! -- , it will implicitly behave like explained in the git-clone(1)
documentation for git clone --single-branch
when the explicit --branch
parameter is missing, and therefore it will clone the primary branch only.
With no surprise, after the clone stage performed by the git submodule update
command, it will finally try to check out the latest commit for the remote branch you previously set up for the submodule, and, if this is not the primary one, it is not part of your local shallow clone, and therefore it will fail with
fatal: Needed a single revision
Unable to find current origin/NotThePrimaryBranch revision in submodule path 'mySubmodule'
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f1777854%2fhow-can-i-specify-a-branch-tag-when-adding-a-git-submodule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note: Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches. See some of the answers below.
It's a little confusing to get used to this, but submodules are not on a branch. They are, like you say, just a pointer to a particular commit of the submodule's repository.
This means, when someone else checks out your repository, or pulls your code, and does git submodule update, the submodule is checked out to that particular commit.
This is great for a submodule that does not change often, because then everyone on the project can have the submodule at the same commit.
If you want to move the submodule to a particular tag:
cd submodule_directory
git checkout v1.0
cd ..
git add submodule_directory
git commit -m "moved submodule to v1.0"
git push
Then, another developer who wants to have submodule_directory changed to that tag, does this
git pull
git submodule update
git pull
changes which commit their submodule directory points to. git submodule update
actually merges in the new code.
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yieldsfatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as ifgit
will only operate on the parent repository.
– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
Isgit checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?
– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
|
show 4 more comments
Note: Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches. See some of the answers below.
It's a little confusing to get used to this, but submodules are not on a branch. They are, like you say, just a pointer to a particular commit of the submodule's repository.
This means, when someone else checks out your repository, or pulls your code, and does git submodule update, the submodule is checked out to that particular commit.
This is great for a submodule that does not change often, because then everyone on the project can have the submodule at the same commit.
If you want to move the submodule to a particular tag:
cd submodule_directory
git checkout v1.0
cd ..
git add submodule_directory
git commit -m "moved submodule to v1.0"
git push
Then, another developer who wants to have submodule_directory changed to that tag, does this
git pull
git submodule update
git pull
changes which commit their submodule directory points to. git submodule update
actually merges in the new code.
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yieldsfatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as ifgit
will only operate on the parent repository.
– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
Isgit checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?
– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
|
show 4 more comments
Note: Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches. See some of the answers below.
It's a little confusing to get used to this, but submodules are not on a branch. They are, like you say, just a pointer to a particular commit of the submodule's repository.
This means, when someone else checks out your repository, or pulls your code, and does git submodule update, the submodule is checked out to that particular commit.
This is great for a submodule that does not change often, because then everyone on the project can have the submodule at the same commit.
If you want to move the submodule to a particular tag:
cd submodule_directory
git checkout v1.0
cd ..
git add submodule_directory
git commit -m "moved submodule to v1.0"
git push
Then, another developer who wants to have submodule_directory changed to that tag, does this
git pull
git submodule update
git pull
changes which commit their submodule directory points to. git submodule update
actually merges in the new code.
Note: Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches. See some of the answers below.
It's a little confusing to get used to this, but submodules are not on a branch. They are, like you say, just a pointer to a particular commit of the submodule's repository.
This means, when someone else checks out your repository, or pulls your code, and does git submodule update, the submodule is checked out to that particular commit.
This is great for a submodule that does not change often, because then everyone on the project can have the submodule at the same commit.
If you want to move the submodule to a particular tag:
cd submodule_directory
git checkout v1.0
cd ..
git add submodule_directory
git commit -m "moved submodule to v1.0"
git push
Then, another developer who wants to have submodule_directory changed to that tag, does this
git pull
git submodule update
git pull
changes which commit their submodule directory points to. git submodule update
actually merges in the new code.
edited Aug 2 '14 at 14:59
jlengstorf
292129
292129
answered Nov 22 '09 at 9:19
djacobs7
7,05521727
7,05521727
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yieldsfatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as ifgit
will only operate on the parent repository.
– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
Isgit checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?
– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
|
show 4 more comments
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yieldsfatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as ifgit
will only operate on the parent repository.
– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
Isgit checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?
– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
5
5
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
That's a very good explanation, thanks! And of course, after reading your answer, I realized the commit is saved inside the submodule itself (submodule/.git/HEAD).
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:19
3
3
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.
cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yields fatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as if git
will only operate on the parent repository.– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
This doesn't seem to work on git 1.7.4.4.
cd my_submodule; git checkout [ref in submodule's repository
yields fatal: reference is not a tree: ...
. It's as if git
will only operate on the parent repository.– James A. Rosen
May 4 '12 at 21:12
3
3
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
It's good to use git submodules even for projects that are updated often. The linux kernel uses it and it isn't so bad
– Rudolf Olah
Apr 30 '13 at 18:15
8
8
Is
git checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
Is
git checkout v1.0
a branch or a tag?– Bernhard Döbler
Oct 1 '15 at 22:30
6
6
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
Consider a tag a human readable alias to a commit. And a commit is a set of specific state for each file. A branch is essentially the same thing except you can make changes to it.
– deadbabykitten
Feb 2 '16 at 0:13
|
show 4 more comments
I'd like to add an answer here that is really just a conglomerate of other answers, but I think it may be more complete.
You know you have a Git submodule when you have these two things.
Your
.gitmodules
has an entry like so:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
You have a submodule object (named SubmoduleTestRepo in this example) in your Git repository. GitHub shows these as "submodule" objects. Or do
git submodule status
from a command line. Git submodule objects are special kinds of Git objects, and they hold the SHA information for a specific commit.
Whenever you do a
git submodule update
, it will populate your submodule with content from the commit. It knows where to find the commit because of the information in the.gitmodules
.
Now, all the
-b
does is add one line in your.gitmodules
file. So following the same example it would look like this:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
branch = master
EDIT: only branch name is supported above, not SHA or TAG.
The submodule object is still pointing at a specific commit. The only thing that the
-b
option buys you is the ability to add a--remote
flag to your update as per Vogella's answer:
git submodule update --remote
Instead of populating the content of the submodule to the commit pointed to by the submodule, it replaces that commit with the latest commit on the master branch, THEN it populates the submodule with that commit. This can be done in two steps by djacobs7 answer. Since you have now updated the commit the submodule object is pointing to, you have to commit the changed submodule object into your Git repository.
git submodule add -b
is not some magically way to keep everything up to date with a branch. It is simply adds information about a branch in the.gitmodules
file and gives you the option to update the submodule object to the latest commit of a specified branch before populating it.
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my.gitmodules
and after doing$ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error sayingfatal: Needed a single revision
andUnable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in.gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?
– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in.gitmodules
and rangit submodule update
and nothing happened?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
|
show 11 more comments
I'd like to add an answer here that is really just a conglomerate of other answers, but I think it may be more complete.
You know you have a Git submodule when you have these two things.
Your
.gitmodules
has an entry like so:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
You have a submodule object (named SubmoduleTestRepo in this example) in your Git repository. GitHub shows these as "submodule" objects. Or do
git submodule status
from a command line. Git submodule objects are special kinds of Git objects, and they hold the SHA information for a specific commit.
Whenever you do a
git submodule update
, it will populate your submodule with content from the commit. It knows where to find the commit because of the information in the.gitmodules
.
Now, all the
-b
does is add one line in your.gitmodules
file. So following the same example it would look like this:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
branch = master
EDIT: only branch name is supported above, not SHA or TAG.
The submodule object is still pointing at a specific commit. The only thing that the
-b
option buys you is the ability to add a--remote
flag to your update as per Vogella's answer:
git submodule update --remote
Instead of populating the content of the submodule to the commit pointed to by the submodule, it replaces that commit with the latest commit on the master branch, THEN it populates the submodule with that commit. This can be done in two steps by djacobs7 answer. Since you have now updated the commit the submodule object is pointing to, you have to commit the changed submodule object into your Git repository.
git submodule add -b
is not some magically way to keep everything up to date with a branch. It is simply adds information about a branch in the.gitmodules
file and gives you the option to update the submodule object to the latest commit of a specified branch before populating it.
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my.gitmodules
and after doing$ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error sayingfatal: Needed a single revision
andUnable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in.gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?
– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in.gitmodules
and rangit submodule update
and nothing happened?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
|
show 11 more comments
I'd like to add an answer here that is really just a conglomerate of other answers, but I think it may be more complete.
You know you have a Git submodule when you have these two things.
Your
.gitmodules
has an entry like so:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
You have a submodule object (named SubmoduleTestRepo in this example) in your Git repository. GitHub shows these as "submodule" objects. Or do
git submodule status
from a command line. Git submodule objects are special kinds of Git objects, and they hold the SHA information for a specific commit.
Whenever you do a
git submodule update
, it will populate your submodule with content from the commit. It knows where to find the commit because of the information in the.gitmodules
.
Now, all the
-b
does is add one line in your.gitmodules
file. So following the same example it would look like this:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
branch = master
EDIT: only branch name is supported above, not SHA or TAG.
The submodule object is still pointing at a specific commit. The only thing that the
-b
option buys you is the ability to add a--remote
flag to your update as per Vogella's answer:
git submodule update --remote
Instead of populating the content of the submodule to the commit pointed to by the submodule, it replaces that commit with the latest commit on the master branch, THEN it populates the submodule with that commit. This can be done in two steps by djacobs7 answer. Since you have now updated the commit the submodule object is pointing to, you have to commit the changed submodule object into your Git repository.
git submodule add -b
is not some magically way to keep everything up to date with a branch. It is simply adds information about a branch in the.gitmodules
file and gives you the option to update the submodule object to the latest commit of a specified branch before populating it.
I'd like to add an answer here that is really just a conglomerate of other answers, but I think it may be more complete.
You know you have a Git submodule when you have these two things.
Your
.gitmodules
has an entry like so:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
You have a submodule object (named SubmoduleTestRepo in this example) in your Git repository. GitHub shows these as "submodule" objects. Or do
git submodule status
from a command line. Git submodule objects are special kinds of Git objects, and they hold the SHA information for a specific commit.
Whenever you do a
git submodule update
, it will populate your submodule with content from the commit. It knows where to find the commit because of the information in the.gitmodules
.
Now, all the
-b
does is add one line in your.gitmodules
file. So following the same example it would look like this:
[submodule "SubmoduleTestRepo"]
path = SubmoduleTestRepo
url = https://github.com/jzaccone/SubmoduleTestRepo.git
branch = master
EDIT: only branch name is supported above, not SHA or TAG.
The submodule object is still pointing at a specific commit. The only thing that the
-b
option buys you is the ability to add a--remote
flag to your update as per Vogella's answer:
git submodule update --remote
Instead of populating the content of the submodule to the commit pointed to by the submodule, it replaces that commit with the latest commit on the master branch, THEN it populates the submodule with that commit. This can be done in two steps by djacobs7 answer. Since you have now updated the commit the submodule object is pointing to, you have to commit the changed submodule object into your Git repository.
git submodule add -b
is not some magically way to keep everything up to date with a branch. It is simply adds information about a branch in the.gitmodules
file and gives you the option to update the submodule object to the latest commit of a specified branch before populating it.
edited Oct 19 '18 at 20:10
Peter Mortensen
13.5k1983111
13.5k1983111
answered Sep 14 '13 at 2:33
Johnny Z
6,98521932
6,98521932
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my.gitmodules
and after doing$ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error sayingfatal: Needed a single revision
andUnable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in.gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?
– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in.gitmodules
and rangit submodule update
and nothing happened?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
|
show 11 more comments
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my.gitmodules
and after doing$ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error sayingfatal: Needed a single revision
andUnable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in.gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?
– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in.gitmodules
and rangit submodule update
and nothing happened?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
41
41
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
This answer was the only one that made sense to me. thanks.
– cgTag
Mar 1 '15 at 16:20
9
9
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
This answer should have more up-votes. I've been reading many posts for the past day and this clears up all the confusion. Coming from the SVN world and using externals - one wants to believe that git submodule branch tracking does magically keep everything up to date from the branch - but this is not true! You have to explicitly update them! As you mention, you must commit changed submodule objects.
– dtmland
Mar 25 '15 at 16:16
8
8
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my
.gitmodules
and after doing $ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error saying fatal: Needed a single revision
and Unable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in .gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
Does this branch tracking also work with tags? Instead of a branch I specified a tag in my
.gitmodules
and after doing $ git submodule update --init --remote TestModule
I got an error saying fatal: Needed a single revision
and Unable to find current origin/TestTag revision in submodule path 'TestModule'
. When doing it with a real branch it works. Is there anyway to specify a tag in .gitmodules
without having to specify the exact commit?– Hhut
Sep 4 '15 at 8:19
4
4
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in
.gitmodules
and ran git submodule update
and nothing happened?– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
This doesn't seem to work. I updated the hash in
.gitmodules
and ran git submodule update
and nothing happened?– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 14:17
2
2
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
Somehow this doesnt work for me. With a SHA Commit Id, I always get an error "Unable to find current revision ( I double checked the revision number of HEAD and its correct ) . However if I use master it works.
– infoclogged
Jun 29 '16 at 15:27
|
show 11 more comments
Note that if you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, then (if you have git 1.8.2+):
Make sure the parent repo knows that its submodule now tracks a branch:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.<path>.branch <branch>
Make sure your submodule is actually at the latest of that branch:
cd path/to/your/submodule
git checkout -b branch --track origin/branch
# if the master branch already exist:
git branch -u origin/master master
(with 'origin' being the name of the upstream remote repo the submodule has been cloned from.
A git remote -v
inside that submodule will display it. Usually, it is 'origin')
Don't forget to record the new state of your submodule in your parent repo:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git add path/to/your/submodule
git commit -m "Make submodule tracking a branch"
Subsequent update for that submodule will have to use the
--remote
option:
# update your submodule
# --remote will also fetch and ensure that
# the latest commit from the branch is used
git submodule update --remote
# to avoid fetching use
git submodule update --remote --no-fetch
Note that with Git 2.10+ (Q3 2016), you can use '.
' as a branch name:
The name of the branch is recorded as
submodule.<name>.branch
in.gitmodules
forupdate --remote
.
A special value of.
is used to indicate that the name of the branch in the submodule should be the same name as the current branch in the current repository.
If you want to update all your submodules following a branch:
git submodule update --recursive --remote
Note that the result, for each updated submodule, will almost always be a detached HEAD, as Dan Cameron note in his answer.
(Clintm notes in the comments that, if you run git submodule update --remote
and the resulting sha1 is the same as the branch the submodule is currently on, it won't do anything and leave the submodule still "on that branch" and not in detached head state.)
To ensure the branch is actually checked out (and that won't modify the SHA1 of the special entry representing the submodule for the parent repo), he suggests:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Each submodule will still reference the same SHA1, but if you do make new commits, you will be able to push them because they will be referenced by the branch you want the submodule to track.
After that push within a submodule, don't forget to go back to the parent repo, add, commit and push the new SHA1 for those modified submodules.
Note the use of $toplevel
, recommended in the comments by Alexander Pogrebnyak.$toplevel
was introduced in git1.7.2 in May 2010: commit f030c96.
it contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules
is).
dtmland
adds in the comments:
The foreach script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch.
However, this command gives you both:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
The same command but easier to read:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)";
[ "$branch" = "" ] &&
git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
umläute refines dtmland's command with a simplified version in the comments:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
multiple lines:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'git checkout
$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
Theforeach
script will not depend on the hardcoded<path>
, if you substitute<path>
with$toplevel/
.
– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
Theforeach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:git submodule update --remote --merge
orgit submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.
– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
|
show 9 more comments
Note that if you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, then (if you have git 1.8.2+):
Make sure the parent repo knows that its submodule now tracks a branch:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.<path>.branch <branch>
Make sure your submodule is actually at the latest of that branch:
cd path/to/your/submodule
git checkout -b branch --track origin/branch
# if the master branch already exist:
git branch -u origin/master master
(with 'origin' being the name of the upstream remote repo the submodule has been cloned from.
A git remote -v
inside that submodule will display it. Usually, it is 'origin')
Don't forget to record the new state of your submodule in your parent repo:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git add path/to/your/submodule
git commit -m "Make submodule tracking a branch"
Subsequent update for that submodule will have to use the
--remote
option:
# update your submodule
# --remote will also fetch and ensure that
# the latest commit from the branch is used
git submodule update --remote
# to avoid fetching use
git submodule update --remote --no-fetch
Note that with Git 2.10+ (Q3 2016), you can use '.
' as a branch name:
The name of the branch is recorded as
submodule.<name>.branch
in.gitmodules
forupdate --remote
.
A special value of.
is used to indicate that the name of the branch in the submodule should be the same name as the current branch in the current repository.
If you want to update all your submodules following a branch:
git submodule update --recursive --remote
Note that the result, for each updated submodule, will almost always be a detached HEAD, as Dan Cameron note in his answer.
(Clintm notes in the comments that, if you run git submodule update --remote
and the resulting sha1 is the same as the branch the submodule is currently on, it won't do anything and leave the submodule still "on that branch" and not in detached head state.)
To ensure the branch is actually checked out (and that won't modify the SHA1 of the special entry representing the submodule for the parent repo), he suggests:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Each submodule will still reference the same SHA1, but if you do make new commits, you will be able to push them because they will be referenced by the branch you want the submodule to track.
After that push within a submodule, don't forget to go back to the parent repo, add, commit and push the new SHA1 for those modified submodules.
Note the use of $toplevel
, recommended in the comments by Alexander Pogrebnyak.$toplevel
was introduced in git1.7.2 in May 2010: commit f030c96.
it contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules
is).
dtmland
adds in the comments:
The foreach script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch.
However, this command gives you both:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
The same command but easier to read:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)";
[ "$branch" = "" ] &&
git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
umläute refines dtmland's command with a simplified version in the comments:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
multiple lines:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'git checkout
$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
Theforeach
script will not depend on the hardcoded<path>
, if you substitute<path>
with$toplevel/
.
– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
Theforeach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:git submodule update --remote --merge
orgit submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.
– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
|
show 9 more comments
Note that if you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, then (if you have git 1.8.2+):
Make sure the parent repo knows that its submodule now tracks a branch:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.<path>.branch <branch>
Make sure your submodule is actually at the latest of that branch:
cd path/to/your/submodule
git checkout -b branch --track origin/branch
# if the master branch already exist:
git branch -u origin/master master
(with 'origin' being the name of the upstream remote repo the submodule has been cloned from.
A git remote -v
inside that submodule will display it. Usually, it is 'origin')
Don't forget to record the new state of your submodule in your parent repo:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git add path/to/your/submodule
git commit -m "Make submodule tracking a branch"
Subsequent update for that submodule will have to use the
--remote
option:
# update your submodule
# --remote will also fetch and ensure that
# the latest commit from the branch is used
git submodule update --remote
# to avoid fetching use
git submodule update --remote --no-fetch
Note that with Git 2.10+ (Q3 2016), you can use '.
' as a branch name:
The name of the branch is recorded as
submodule.<name>.branch
in.gitmodules
forupdate --remote
.
A special value of.
is used to indicate that the name of the branch in the submodule should be the same name as the current branch in the current repository.
If you want to update all your submodules following a branch:
git submodule update --recursive --remote
Note that the result, for each updated submodule, will almost always be a detached HEAD, as Dan Cameron note in his answer.
(Clintm notes in the comments that, if you run git submodule update --remote
and the resulting sha1 is the same as the branch the submodule is currently on, it won't do anything and leave the submodule still "on that branch" and not in detached head state.)
To ensure the branch is actually checked out (and that won't modify the SHA1 of the special entry representing the submodule for the parent repo), he suggests:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Each submodule will still reference the same SHA1, but if you do make new commits, you will be able to push them because they will be referenced by the branch you want the submodule to track.
After that push within a submodule, don't forget to go back to the parent repo, add, commit and push the new SHA1 for those modified submodules.
Note the use of $toplevel
, recommended in the comments by Alexander Pogrebnyak.$toplevel
was introduced in git1.7.2 in May 2010: commit f030c96.
it contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules
is).
dtmland
adds in the comments:
The foreach script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch.
However, this command gives you both:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
The same command but easier to read:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)";
[ "$branch" = "" ] &&
git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
umläute refines dtmland's command with a simplified version in the comments:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
multiple lines:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'git checkout
$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
Note that if you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, then (if you have git 1.8.2+):
Make sure the parent repo knows that its submodule now tracks a branch:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.<path>.branch <branch>
Make sure your submodule is actually at the latest of that branch:
cd path/to/your/submodule
git checkout -b branch --track origin/branch
# if the master branch already exist:
git branch -u origin/master master
(with 'origin' being the name of the upstream remote repo the submodule has been cloned from.
A git remote -v
inside that submodule will display it. Usually, it is 'origin')
Don't forget to record the new state of your submodule in your parent repo:
cd /path/to/your/parent/repo
git add path/to/your/submodule
git commit -m "Make submodule tracking a branch"
Subsequent update for that submodule will have to use the
--remote
option:
# update your submodule
# --remote will also fetch and ensure that
# the latest commit from the branch is used
git submodule update --remote
# to avoid fetching use
git submodule update --remote --no-fetch
Note that with Git 2.10+ (Q3 2016), you can use '.
' as a branch name:
The name of the branch is recorded as
submodule.<name>.branch
in.gitmodules
forupdate --remote
.
A special value of.
is used to indicate that the name of the branch in the submodule should be the same name as the current branch in the current repository.
If you want to update all your submodules following a branch:
git submodule update --recursive --remote
Note that the result, for each updated submodule, will almost always be a detached HEAD, as Dan Cameron note in his answer.
(Clintm notes in the comments that, if you run git submodule update --remote
and the resulting sha1 is the same as the branch the submodule is currently on, it won't do anything and leave the submodule still "on that branch" and not in detached head state.)
To ensure the branch is actually checked out (and that won't modify the SHA1 of the special entry representing the submodule for the parent repo), he suggests:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Each submodule will still reference the same SHA1, but if you do make new commits, you will be able to push them because they will be referenced by the branch you want the submodule to track.
After that push within a submodule, don't forget to go back to the parent repo, add, commit and push the new SHA1 for those modified submodules.
Note the use of $toplevel
, recommended in the comments by Alexander Pogrebnyak.$toplevel
was introduced in git1.7.2 in May 2010: commit f030c96.
it contains the absolute path of the top level directory (where
.gitmodules
is).
dtmland
adds in the comments:
The foreach script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch.
However, this command gives you both:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
The same command but easier to read:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)";
[ "$branch" = "" ] &&
git checkout master || git checkout $branch' –
umläute refines dtmland's command with a simplified version in the comments:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
multiple lines:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive
'git checkout
$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
edited May 25 '18 at 19:51
answered Sep 14 '13 at 6:59
VonC
831k28926153160
831k28926153160
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
Theforeach
script will not depend on the hardcoded<path>
, if you substitute<path>
with$toplevel/
.
– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
Theforeach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:git submodule update --remote --merge
orgit submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.
– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
|
show 9 more comments
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
Theforeach
script will not depend on the hardcoded<path>
, if you substitute<path>
with$toplevel/
.
– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
Theforeach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:git submodule update --remote --merge
orgit submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.
– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
1
1
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
Question: if i have folder subModule1 and wish to track master branch, would the resulting command look like this: git config -f .gitmodules submodule.subModule1.branch master
– BraveNewMath
Sep 17 '13 at 20:41
1
1
The
foreach
script will not depend on the hardcoded <path>
, if you substitute <path>
with $toplevel/
.– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
The
foreach
script will not depend on the hardcoded <path>
, if you substitute <path>
with $toplevel/
.– Alexander Pogrebnyak
Nov 27 '13 at 18:19
1
1
The
foreach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both: git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
The
foreach
script will fail to checkout submodules that are not following a branch. However, this command gives you both: git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; [ "$branch" = "" ] && git checkout master || git checkout $branch'
– dtmland
Jul 10 '15 at 19:09
2
2
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
here's a simplified version of @dtmland's script:
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'git checkout $(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch || echo master)'
– umläute
Oct 15 '15 at 11:54
1
1
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:
git submodule update --remote --merge
or git submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
Ohh! Actually the foreach script is unnecessary. We have to execute the submodule update with the --merge or --rebase switch:
git submodule update --remote --merge
or git submodule update --remote --rebase
. These commands do the tracking of the remote branch.– GregTom
Apr 17 '17 at 4:16
|
show 9 more comments
Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches.
# add submodule to track master branch
git submodule add -b master [URL to Git repo];
# update your submodule
git submodule update --remote
See also Git submodules
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on.gitmodules
file?
– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
You can lock to a tag withgit submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the linebranch = tags/<sometag>
in.gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
|
show 1 more comment
Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches.
# add submodule to track master branch
git submodule add -b master [URL to Git repo];
# update your submodule
git submodule update --remote
See also Git submodules
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on.gitmodules
file?
– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
You can lock to a tag withgit submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the linebranch = tags/<sometag>
in.gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
|
show 1 more comment
Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches.
# add submodule to track master branch
git submodule add -b master [URL to Git repo];
# update your submodule
git submodule update --remote
See also Git submodules
Git 1.8.2 added the possibility to track branches.
# add submodule to track master branch
git submodule add -b master [URL to Git repo];
# update your submodule
git submodule update --remote
See also Git submodules
answered Apr 3 '13 at 8:44
vogella
13.7k42321
13.7k42321
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on.gitmodules
file?
– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
You can lock to a tag withgit submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the linebranch = tags/<sometag>
in.gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
|
show 1 more comment
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on.gitmodules
file?
– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
You can lock to a tag withgit submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the linebranch = tags/<sometag>
in.gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
2
2
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
Does this apply to tags as well?
– ThorSummoner
Jul 2 '14 at 21:28
1
1
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on
.gitmodules
file?– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
How does adding submodule in such way reflect on
.gitmodules
file?– Eugene
Jul 20 '14 at 12:22
1
1
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
Thanks I just used the info about to help me to create a submodule folder that is synced with a GitHub gh-pages website: full example at github.com/o2platform/fluentnode/issues/22
– Dinis Cruz
Dec 24 '14 at 2:03
2
2
You can lock to a tag with
git submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the line branch = tags/<sometag>
in .gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
You can lock to a tag with
git submodule add -b tags/<sometag> <url>
which you can see as the line branch = tags/<sometag>
in .gitmodules
– KCD
Oct 16 '15 at 2:27
2
2
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
@KCD Which version of git can do that with tags. Mine doesn't work?
– CMCDragonkai
Apr 4 '16 at 13:56
|
show 1 more comment
An example of how I use Git submodules.
- Create a new repository
- Then clone another repository as a submodule
- Then we have that submodule use a tag called V3.1.2
- And then we commit.
And that looks a little bit like this:
git init
vi README
git add README
git commit
git submodule add git://github.com/XXXXX/xxx.yyyy.git stm32_std_lib
git status
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd stm32_std_lib/
git reset --hard V3.1.2
cd ..
git commit -a
git submodule status
Maybe it helps (even though I use a tag and not a branch)?
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
Should you be able to commit a change after yourgit reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with agit status
of the parent directory.
– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
add a comment |
An example of how I use Git submodules.
- Create a new repository
- Then clone another repository as a submodule
- Then we have that submodule use a tag called V3.1.2
- And then we commit.
And that looks a little bit like this:
git init
vi README
git add README
git commit
git submodule add git://github.com/XXXXX/xxx.yyyy.git stm32_std_lib
git status
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd stm32_std_lib/
git reset --hard V3.1.2
cd ..
git commit -a
git submodule status
Maybe it helps (even though I use a tag and not a branch)?
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
Should you be able to commit a change after yourgit reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with agit status
of the parent directory.
– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
add a comment |
An example of how I use Git submodules.
- Create a new repository
- Then clone another repository as a submodule
- Then we have that submodule use a tag called V3.1.2
- And then we commit.
And that looks a little bit like this:
git init
vi README
git add README
git commit
git submodule add git://github.com/XXXXX/xxx.yyyy.git stm32_std_lib
git status
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd stm32_std_lib/
git reset --hard V3.1.2
cd ..
git commit -a
git submodule status
Maybe it helps (even though I use a tag and not a branch)?
An example of how I use Git submodules.
- Create a new repository
- Then clone another repository as a submodule
- Then we have that submodule use a tag called V3.1.2
- And then we commit.
And that looks a little bit like this:
git init
vi README
git add README
git commit
git submodule add git://github.com/XXXXX/xxx.yyyy.git stm32_std_lib
git status
git submodule init
git submodule update
cd stm32_std_lib/
git reset --hard V3.1.2
cd ..
git commit -a
git submodule status
Maybe it helps (even though I use a tag and not a branch)?
edited Dec 30 '18 at 10:43
Peter Mortensen
13.5k1983111
13.5k1983111
answered Nov 22 '09 at 9:53
Johan
10.1k2479105
10.1k2479105
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
Should you be able to commit a change after yourgit reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with agit status
of the parent directory.
– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
add a comment |
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
Should you be able to commit a change after yourgit reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with agit status
of the parent directory.
– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
4
4
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
It's basically the same answer as djacobs7, but thanks anyway :)
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:22
1
1
Should you be able to commit a change after your
git reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with a git status
of the parent directory.– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
Should you be able to commit a change after your
git reset --hard V3.1.2
? I just get a "nothing to commit" with a git status
of the parent directory.– Nick Radford
Oct 10 '12 at 20:07
1
1
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
@Ivan: Could you explain how this is the same as djacobs7's response? As far as I see, his response doesn't even include the 'submodule add' command, instead the repo is added directly, without any link to the module's original git repo. At least when I tried this approach there was no link in .gitmodules.
– Michel Müller
Aug 12 '13 at 8:14
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
djacobs7's response doesn't include the whole explanation starting from adding the submodule. He assumes you already have it.
– CodeMonkey
Aug 22 '17 at 6:04
add a comment |
In my experience switching branches in the superproject or future checkouts will still cause detached HEADs of submodules regardless if the submodule is properly added and tracked (i.e. @djacobs7 and @Johnny Z answers).
And instead of manually checking out the correct branch manually or through a script git submodule foreach can be used.
This will check the submodule config file for the branch property and checkout the set branch.
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f <path>.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
add a comment |
In my experience switching branches in the superproject or future checkouts will still cause detached HEADs of submodules regardless if the submodule is properly added and tracked (i.e. @djacobs7 and @Johnny Z answers).
And instead of manually checking out the correct branch manually or through a script git submodule foreach can be used.
This will check the submodule config file for the branch property and checkout the set branch.
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f <path>.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
add a comment |
In my experience switching branches in the superproject or future checkouts will still cause detached HEADs of submodules regardless if the submodule is properly added and tracked (i.e. @djacobs7 and @Johnny Z answers).
And instead of manually checking out the correct branch manually or through a script git submodule foreach can be used.
This will check the submodule config file for the branch property and checkout the set branch.
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f <path>.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
In my experience switching branches in the superproject or future checkouts will still cause detached HEADs of submodules regardless if the submodule is properly added and tracked (i.e. @djacobs7 and @Johnny Z answers).
And instead of manually checking out the correct branch manually or through a script git submodule foreach can be used.
This will check the submodule config file for the branch property and checkout the set branch.
git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f <path>.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'
answered Nov 9 '13 at 4:54
Dan Cameron
64668
64668
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
add a comment |
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
Nice. +1. I have included your command in my answer.
– VonC
Nov 9 '13 at 8:17
add a comment |
Git submodules are a little bit strange - they're always in "detached head" mode - they don't update to the latest commit on a branch like you might expect.
This does make some sense when you think about it, though. Let's say I create repository foo with submodule bar. I push my changes and tell you to check out commit a7402be from repository foo.
Then imagine that someone commits a change to repository bar before you can make your clone.
When you check out commit a7402be from repository foo, you expect to get the same code I pushed. That's why submodules don't update until you tell them to explicitly and then make a new commit.
Personally I think submodules are the most confusing part of Git. There are lots of places that can explain submodules better than I can. I recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon.
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclarkgit clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D
– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
add a comment |
Git submodules are a little bit strange - they're always in "detached head" mode - they don't update to the latest commit on a branch like you might expect.
This does make some sense when you think about it, though. Let's say I create repository foo with submodule bar. I push my changes and tell you to check out commit a7402be from repository foo.
Then imagine that someone commits a change to repository bar before you can make your clone.
When you check out commit a7402be from repository foo, you expect to get the same code I pushed. That's why submodules don't update until you tell them to explicitly and then make a new commit.
Personally I think submodules are the most confusing part of Git. There are lots of places that can explain submodules better than I can. I recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon.
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclarkgit clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D
– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
add a comment |
Git submodules are a little bit strange - they're always in "detached head" mode - they don't update to the latest commit on a branch like you might expect.
This does make some sense when you think about it, though. Let's say I create repository foo with submodule bar. I push my changes and tell you to check out commit a7402be from repository foo.
Then imagine that someone commits a change to repository bar before you can make your clone.
When you check out commit a7402be from repository foo, you expect to get the same code I pushed. That's why submodules don't update until you tell them to explicitly and then make a new commit.
Personally I think submodules are the most confusing part of Git. There are lots of places that can explain submodules better than I can. I recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon.
Git submodules are a little bit strange - they're always in "detached head" mode - they don't update to the latest commit on a branch like you might expect.
This does make some sense when you think about it, though. Let's say I create repository foo with submodule bar. I push my changes and tell you to check out commit a7402be from repository foo.
Then imagine that someone commits a change to repository bar before you can make your clone.
When you check out commit a7402be from repository foo, you expect to get the same code I pushed. That's why submodules don't update until you tell them to explicitly and then make a new commit.
Personally I think submodules are the most confusing part of Git. There are lots of places that can explain submodules better than I can. I recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon.
edited Oct 19 '18 at 20:06
Peter Mortensen
13.5k1983111
13.5k1983111
answered Nov 22 '09 at 5:22
Neall
19.9k33944
19.9k33944
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclarkgit clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D
– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
add a comment |
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclarkgit clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D
– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
I think it's time I start reading some git books, thanks for the recommendation.
– Ivan
Nov 22 '09 at 18:21
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
Sorry, but you didn't clarify if one would get the same as you pushed to a7402be , or get the latest of bar, though your version of foo. Thanks :)
– momo
Dec 1 '11 at 12:44
5
5
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
The issue is that there should be an option to say "keep this submodule on branch X" so that if you WANT it to automatically update itself then you can make that happen. It would make submodules much more useful for managing e.g. a WordPress installation where plugins are all Git repos without having to re-save the superproject for every plugin that updates.
– jerclarke
Oct 25 '12 at 18:23
@jeremyclark
git clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
@jeremyclark
git clone git://github.com/git/git.git
and push that feature...? =D– Alastair
Nov 7 '12 at 4:01
add a comment |
To switch branch for a submodule (assuming you already have the submodule as part of the repository):
cd
to root of your repository containing the submodules- Open
.gitmodules
for editing - Add line below
path = ...
andurl = ...
that saysbranch = your-branch
, for each submodule; save file.gitmodules
. - then without changing directory do
$ git submodule update --remote
...this should pull in the latest commits on the specified branch, for each submodule thus modified.
add a comment |
To switch branch for a submodule (assuming you already have the submodule as part of the repository):
cd
to root of your repository containing the submodules- Open
.gitmodules
for editing - Add line below
path = ...
andurl = ...
that saysbranch = your-branch
, for each submodule; save file.gitmodules
. - then without changing directory do
$ git submodule update --remote
...this should pull in the latest commits on the specified branch, for each submodule thus modified.
add a comment |
To switch branch for a submodule (assuming you already have the submodule as part of the repository):
cd
to root of your repository containing the submodules- Open
.gitmodules
for editing - Add line below
path = ...
andurl = ...
that saysbranch = your-branch
, for each submodule; save file.gitmodules
. - then without changing directory do
$ git submodule update --remote
...this should pull in the latest commits on the specified branch, for each submodule thus modified.
To switch branch for a submodule (assuming you already have the submodule as part of the repository):
cd
to root of your repository containing the submodules- Open
.gitmodules
for editing - Add line below
path = ...
andurl = ...
that saysbranch = your-branch
, for each submodule; save file.gitmodules
. - then without changing directory do
$ git submodule update --remote
...this should pull in the latest commits on the specified branch, for each submodule thus modified.
edited Oct 19 '18 at 20:14
Peter Mortensen
13.5k1983111
13.5k1983111
answered Jun 12 '16 at 13:34
Arcane Engineer
4,69254684
4,69254684
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have this in my .gitconfig file. It is still a draft, but proved useful as of now. It helps me to always reattach the submodules to their branch.
[alias]
######################
#
#Submodules aliases
#
######################
#git sm-trackbranch : places all submodules on their respective branch specified in .gitmodules
#This works if submodules are configured to track a branch, i.e if .gitmodules looks like :
#[submodule "my-submodule"]
# path = my-submodule
# url = git@wherever.you.like/my-submodule.git
# branch = my-branch
sm-trackbranch = "! git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'"
#sm-pullrebase :
# - pull --rebase on the master repo
# - sm-trackbranch on every submodule
# - pull --rebase on each submodule
#
# Important note :
#- have a clean master repo and subrepos before doing this !
#- this is *not* equivalent to getting the last committed
# master repo + its submodules: if some submodules are tracking branches
# that have evolved since the last commit in the master repo,
# they will be using those more recent commits !
#
# (Note : On the contrary, git submodule update will stick
#to the last committed SHA1 in the master repo)
#
sm-pullrebase = "! git pull --rebase; git submodule update; git sm-trackbranch ; git submodule foreach 'git pull --rebase' "
# git sm-diff will diff the master repo *and* its submodules
sm-diff = "! git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff' "
#git sm-push will ask to push also submodules
sm-push = push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
#git alias : list all aliases
#useful in order to learn git syntax
alias = "!git config -l | grep alias | cut -c 7-"
add a comment |
I have this in my .gitconfig file. It is still a draft, but proved useful as of now. It helps me to always reattach the submodules to their branch.
[alias]
######################
#
#Submodules aliases
#
######################
#git sm-trackbranch : places all submodules on their respective branch specified in .gitmodules
#This works if submodules are configured to track a branch, i.e if .gitmodules looks like :
#[submodule "my-submodule"]
# path = my-submodule
# url = git@wherever.you.like/my-submodule.git
# branch = my-branch
sm-trackbranch = "! git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'"
#sm-pullrebase :
# - pull --rebase on the master repo
# - sm-trackbranch on every submodule
# - pull --rebase on each submodule
#
# Important note :
#- have a clean master repo and subrepos before doing this !
#- this is *not* equivalent to getting the last committed
# master repo + its submodules: if some submodules are tracking branches
# that have evolved since the last commit in the master repo,
# they will be using those more recent commits !
#
# (Note : On the contrary, git submodule update will stick
#to the last committed SHA1 in the master repo)
#
sm-pullrebase = "! git pull --rebase; git submodule update; git sm-trackbranch ; git submodule foreach 'git pull --rebase' "
# git sm-diff will diff the master repo *and* its submodules
sm-diff = "! git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff' "
#git sm-push will ask to push also submodules
sm-push = push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
#git alias : list all aliases
#useful in order to learn git syntax
alias = "!git config -l | grep alias | cut -c 7-"
add a comment |
I have this in my .gitconfig file. It is still a draft, but proved useful as of now. It helps me to always reattach the submodules to their branch.
[alias]
######################
#
#Submodules aliases
#
######################
#git sm-trackbranch : places all submodules on their respective branch specified in .gitmodules
#This works if submodules are configured to track a branch, i.e if .gitmodules looks like :
#[submodule "my-submodule"]
# path = my-submodule
# url = git@wherever.you.like/my-submodule.git
# branch = my-branch
sm-trackbranch = "! git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'"
#sm-pullrebase :
# - pull --rebase on the master repo
# - sm-trackbranch on every submodule
# - pull --rebase on each submodule
#
# Important note :
#- have a clean master repo and subrepos before doing this !
#- this is *not* equivalent to getting the last committed
# master repo + its submodules: if some submodules are tracking branches
# that have evolved since the last commit in the master repo,
# they will be using those more recent commits !
#
# (Note : On the contrary, git submodule update will stick
#to the last committed SHA1 in the master repo)
#
sm-pullrebase = "! git pull --rebase; git submodule update; git sm-trackbranch ; git submodule foreach 'git pull --rebase' "
# git sm-diff will diff the master repo *and* its submodules
sm-diff = "! git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff' "
#git sm-push will ask to push also submodules
sm-push = push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
#git alias : list all aliases
#useful in order to learn git syntax
alias = "!git config -l | grep alias | cut -c 7-"
I have this in my .gitconfig file. It is still a draft, but proved useful as of now. It helps me to always reattach the submodules to their branch.
[alias]
######################
#
#Submodules aliases
#
######################
#git sm-trackbranch : places all submodules on their respective branch specified in .gitmodules
#This works if submodules are configured to track a branch, i.e if .gitmodules looks like :
#[submodule "my-submodule"]
# path = my-submodule
# url = git@wherever.you.like/my-submodule.git
# branch = my-branch
sm-trackbranch = "! git submodule foreach -q --recursive 'branch="$(git config -f $toplevel/.gitmodules submodule.$name.branch)"; git checkout $branch'"
#sm-pullrebase :
# - pull --rebase on the master repo
# - sm-trackbranch on every submodule
# - pull --rebase on each submodule
#
# Important note :
#- have a clean master repo and subrepos before doing this !
#- this is *not* equivalent to getting the last committed
# master repo + its submodules: if some submodules are tracking branches
# that have evolved since the last commit in the master repo,
# they will be using those more recent commits !
#
# (Note : On the contrary, git submodule update will stick
#to the last committed SHA1 in the master repo)
#
sm-pullrebase = "! git pull --rebase; git submodule update; git sm-trackbranch ; git submodule foreach 'git pull --rebase' "
# git sm-diff will diff the master repo *and* its submodules
sm-diff = "! git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff' "
#git sm-push will ask to push also submodules
sm-push = push --recurse-submodules=on-demand
#git alias : list all aliases
#useful in order to learn git syntax
alias = "!git config -l | grep alias | cut -c 7-"
edited Apr 1 '15 at 16:41
answered Apr 1 '15 at 16:27
Pascal T.
1,95832429
1,95832429
add a comment |
add a comment |
We use Quack to pull a specific module from another Git repository. We need to pull code without the whole code base of the provided repository - we need a very specific module / file from that huge repository and should be updated every time we run update.
So we achieved it in this way:
Create configuration
name: Project Name
modules:
local/path:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
path: repo/path
branch: dev
other/local/path/filename.txt:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
hexsha: 9e3e9642cfea36f4ae216d27df100134920143b9
path: repo/path/filename.txt
profiles:
init:
tasks: ['modules']
With the above configuration, it creates one directory from the provided GitHub repository as specified in first module configuration, and the other one is to pull and create a file from the given repository.
Other developers just need to run
$ quack
And it pulls the code from the above configurations.
add a comment |
We use Quack to pull a specific module from another Git repository. We need to pull code without the whole code base of the provided repository - we need a very specific module / file from that huge repository and should be updated every time we run update.
So we achieved it in this way:
Create configuration
name: Project Name
modules:
local/path:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
path: repo/path
branch: dev
other/local/path/filename.txt:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
hexsha: 9e3e9642cfea36f4ae216d27df100134920143b9
path: repo/path/filename.txt
profiles:
init:
tasks: ['modules']
With the above configuration, it creates one directory from the provided GitHub repository as specified in first module configuration, and the other one is to pull and create a file from the given repository.
Other developers just need to run
$ quack
And it pulls the code from the above configurations.
add a comment |
We use Quack to pull a specific module from another Git repository. We need to pull code without the whole code base of the provided repository - we need a very specific module / file from that huge repository and should be updated every time we run update.
So we achieved it in this way:
Create configuration
name: Project Name
modules:
local/path:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
path: repo/path
branch: dev
other/local/path/filename.txt:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
hexsha: 9e3e9642cfea36f4ae216d27df100134920143b9
path: repo/path/filename.txt
profiles:
init:
tasks: ['modules']
With the above configuration, it creates one directory from the provided GitHub repository as specified in first module configuration, and the other one is to pull and create a file from the given repository.
Other developers just need to run
$ quack
And it pulls the code from the above configurations.
We use Quack to pull a specific module from another Git repository. We need to pull code without the whole code base of the provided repository - we need a very specific module / file from that huge repository and should be updated every time we run update.
So we achieved it in this way:
Create configuration
name: Project Name
modules:
local/path:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
path: repo/path
branch: dev
other/local/path/filename.txt:
repository: https://github.com/<username>/<repo>.git
hexsha: 9e3e9642cfea36f4ae216d27df100134920143b9
path: repo/path/filename.txt
profiles:
init:
tasks: ['modules']
With the above configuration, it creates one directory from the provided GitHub repository as specified in first module configuration, and the other one is to pull and create a file from the given repository.
Other developers just need to run
$ quack
And it pulls the code from the above configurations.
edited Oct 19 '18 at 20:14
Peter Mortensen
13.5k1983111
13.5k1983111
answered Oct 22 '15 at 14:35
Love Sharma
1,55211331
1,55211331
add a comment |
add a comment |
The only effect of choosing a branch for a submodule is that, whenever you pass the --remote
option in the git submodule update
command line, Git will check out in detached HEAD mode (if the default --checkout
behavior is selected) the latest commit of that selected remote branch.
You must be particularly careful when using this remote branch tracking feature for Git submodules if you work with shallow clones of submodules.
The branch you choose for this purpose in submodule settings IS NOT the one that will be cloned during git submodule update --remote
.
If you pass also the --depth
parameter and you do not instruct Git about which branch you want to clone -- and actually you cannot in the git submodule update
command line!! -- , it will implicitly behave like explained in the git-clone(1)
documentation for git clone --single-branch
when the explicit --branch
parameter is missing, and therefore it will clone the primary branch only.
With no surprise, after the clone stage performed by the git submodule update
command, it will finally try to check out the latest commit for the remote branch you previously set up for the submodule, and, if this is not the primary one, it is not part of your local shallow clone, and therefore it will fail with
fatal: Needed a single revision
Unable to find current origin/NotThePrimaryBranch revision in submodule path 'mySubmodule'
add a comment |
The only effect of choosing a branch for a submodule is that, whenever you pass the --remote
option in the git submodule update
command line, Git will check out in detached HEAD mode (if the default --checkout
behavior is selected) the latest commit of that selected remote branch.
You must be particularly careful when using this remote branch tracking feature for Git submodules if you work with shallow clones of submodules.
The branch you choose for this purpose in submodule settings IS NOT the one that will be cloned during git submodule update --remote
.
If you pass also the --depth
parameter and you do not instruct Git about which branch you want to clone -- and actually you cannot in the git submodule update
command line!! -- , it will implicitly behave like explained in the git-clone(1)
documentation for git clone --single-branch
when the explicit --branch
parameter is missing, and therefore it will clone the primary branch only.
With no surprise, after the clone stage performed by the git submodule update
command, it will finally try to check out the latest commit for the remote branch you previously set up for the submodule, and, if this is not the primary one, it is not part of your local shallow clone, and therefore it will fail with
fatal: Needed a single revision
Unable to find current origin/NotThePrimaryBranch revision in submodule path 'mySubmodule'
add a comment |
The only effect of choosing a branch for a submodule is that, whenever you pass the --remote
option in the git submodule update
command line, Git will check out in detached HEAD mode (if the default --checkout
behavior is selected) the latest commit of that selected remote branch.
You must be particularly careful when using this remote branch tracking feature for Git submodules if you work with shallow clones of submodules.
The branch you choose for this purpose in submodule settings IS NOT the one that will be cloned during git submodule update --remote
.
If you pass also the --depth
parameter and you do not instruct Git about which branch you want to clone -- and actually you cannot in the git submodule update
command line!! -- , it will implicitly behave like explained in the git-clone(1)
documentation for git clone --single-branch
when the explicit --branch
parameter is missing, and therefore it will clone the primary branch only.
With no surprise, after the clone stage performed by the git submodule update
command, it will finally try to check out the latest commit for the remote branch you previously set up for the submodule, and, if this is not the primary one, it is not part of your local shallow clone, and therefore it will fail with
fatal: Needed a single revision
Unable to find current origin/NotThePrimaryBranch revision in submodule path 'mySubmodule'
The only effect of choosing a branch for a submodule is that, whenever you pass the --remote
option in the git submodule update
command line, Git will check out in detached HEAD mode (if the default --checkout
behavior is selected) the latest commit of that selected remote branch.
You must be particularly careful when using this remote branch tracking feature for Git submodules if you work with shallow clones of submodules.
The branch you choose for this purpose in submodule settings IS NOT the one that will be cloned during git submodule update --remote
.
If you pass also the --depth
parameter and you do not instruct Git about which branch you want to clone -- and actually you cannot in the git submodule update
command line!! -- , it will implicitly behave like explained in the git-clone(1)
documentation for git clone --single-branch
when the explicit --branch
parameter is missing, and therefore it will clone the primary branch only.
With no surprise, after the clone stage performed by the git submodule update
command, it will finally try to check out the latest commit for the remote branch you previously set up for the submodule, and, if this is not the primary one, it is not part of your local shallow clone, and therefore it will fail with
fatal: Needed a single revision
Unable to find current origin/NotThePrimaryBranch revision in submodule path 'mySubmodule'
edited Nov 14 '18 at 12:01
answered May 29 '18 at 15:52
LuKePicci
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f1777854%2fhow-can-i-specify-a-branch-tag-when-adding-a-git-submodule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
If you have an existing submodule which isn't tracking a branch yet, but you wish it now would track a branch... see my answer below
– VonC
Sep 14 '13 at 7:00