flutter loop through firebase node that consists of singlenodes and nodes with children
I have this piece of code:
routineExersiceIDsetter() async{
String routineId;
final response = await reference.child(_userId).once();
response.value.forEach((k,v){
if(v["name"] == "First Routine"){
currentRoutineId = k;
routineId = k;
}
});
final response2 = await reference.child(_userId).child(currentRoutineId).once();
response2.value.forEach((k, v){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId = k;
}
});
}
and this piece of a firebase database
{
"-LBNflaqFEb4DtZiYxnh" : {
"-LBWa99g4yCstUBkDGa7" : {
"name" : "Day 1"
},
"name" : "First Routine"
}
}
the first forEach line works but the second doesn't. Is there a way to make this work or do I need to change my firebase architecture?
json firebase dart flutter
|
show 4 more comments
I have this piece of code:
routineExersiceIDsetter() async{
String routineId;
final response = await reference.child(_userId).once();
response.value.forEach((k,v){
if(v["name"] == "First Routine"){
currentRoutineId = k;
routineId = k;
}
});
final response2 = await reference.child(_userId).child(currentRoutineId).once();
response2.value.forEach((k, v){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId = k;
}
});
}
and this piece of a firebase database
{
"-LBNflaqFEb4DtZiYxnh" : {
"-LBWa99g4yCstUBkDGa7" : {
"name" : "Day 1"
},
"name" : "First Routine"
}
}
the first forEach line works but the second doesn't. Is there a way to make this work or do I need to change my firebase architecture?
json firebase dart flutter
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the twoawait
s. Are you surecurrentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01
|
show 4 more comments
I have this piece of code:
routineExersiceIDsetter() async{
String routineId;
final response = await reference.child(_userId).once();
response.value.forEach((k,v){
if(v["name"] == "First Routine"){
currentRoutineId = k;
routineId = k;
}
});
final response2 = await reference.child(_userId).child(currentRoutineId).once();
response2.value.forEach((k, v){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId = k;
}
});
}
and this piece of a firebase database
{
"-LBNflaqFEb4DtZiYxnh" : {
"-LBWa99g4yCstUBkDGa7" : {
"name" : "Day 1"
},
"name" : "First Routine"
}
}
the first forEach line works but the second doesn't. Is there a way to make this work or do I need to change my firebase architecture?
json firebase dart flutter
I have this piece of code:
routineExersiceIDsetter() async{
String routineId;
final response = await reference.child(_userId).once();
response.value.forEach((k,v){
if(v["name"] == "First Routine"){
currentRoutineId = k;
routineId = k;
}
});
final response2 = await reference.child(_userId).child(currentRoutineId).once();
response2.value.forEach((k, v){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId = k;
}
});
}
and this piece of a firebase database
{
"-LBNflaqFEb4DtZiYxnh" : {
"-LBWa99g4yCstUBkDGa7" : {
"name" : "Day 1"
},
"name" : "First Routine"
}
}
the first forEach line works but the second doesn't. Is there a way to make this work or do I need to change my firebase architecture?
json firebase dart flutter
json firebase dart flutter
edited Nov 12 '18 at 4:54
Cœur
17.4k9103145
17.4k9103145
asked May 2 '18 at 16:51
merlijn mac gillavry
153
153
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the twoawait
s. Are you surecurrentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01
|
show 4 more comments
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the twoawait
s. Are you surecurrentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the two
await
s. Are you sure currentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the two
await
s. Are you sure currentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I realised is should have wrapped the second ifstatement in another ifstatement:
if(k!="name"){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId =k;
}
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f50139785%2fflutter-loop-through-firebase-node-that-consists-of-singlenodes-and-nodes-with-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I realised is should have wrapped the second ifstatement in another ifstatement:
if(k!="name"){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId =k;
}
}
add a comment |
I realised is should have wrapped the second ifstatement in another ifstatement:
if(k!="name"){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId =k;
}
}
add a comment |
I realised is should have wrapped the second ifstatement in another ifstatement:
if(k!="name"){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId =k;
}
}
I realised is should have wrapped the second ifstatement in another ifstatement:
if(k!="name"){
if(v["name"] == "Day 1"){
currentSchemeId =k;
}
}
answered May 2 '18 at 21:45
merlijn mac gillavry
153
153
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f50139785%2fflutter-loop-through-firebase-node-that-consists-of-singlenodes-and-nodes-with-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Don't you have to chain the two requests? Queries to Firebase are asynchronous so you should wait the first query resolves to have the value of currentRoutineId and only then you can execute the second query. I don't know how to chain that in dart, so I cannot help you with a full solution.
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:40
@RenaudTarnec I thought I already did that with the await request the perror i get is : type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:42
I don't know dart but I have the feeling you are not linking the two
await
s. Are you surecurrentRoutineId
has a correct value in the second 'await'? Can you check with console or log?– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 17:45
@RenaudTarnec from what I've seen it gets the correct routineid but it still gives an error in the second foreach
– merlijn mac gillavry
May 2 '18 at 17:53
What do you exactly want to do? Because it seems all the info is under one node
– Renaud Tarnec
May 2 '18 at 18:01