Why does rxjs 6 combineLatest have type error when upgrading from rxjs 5?












0















I have the following code which compiled without errors in rxjs 5:



a$ = Observable.combineLatest([x$, y$])
.subscribe(([x, y]:[X, Y]) => {


When I update to rxjs 6 the following error occurs:



Argument of type '([x, y]: [X, Y]) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: Y) => void'.
Types of parameters '__0' and 'value' are incompatible.
Type 'Y' is not assignable to type '[X, Y]'.
Property '0' is missing in type 'Y'.


Also, the error goes away if I change either type X or Y to the any type.










share|improve this question

























  • AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:10








  • 1





    Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:21











  • Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:22











  • Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:42
















0















I have the following code which compiled without errors in rxjs 5:



a$ = Observable.combineLatest([x$, y$])
.subscribe(([x, y]:[X, Y]) => {


When I update to rxjs 6 the following error occurs:



Argument of type '([x, y]: [X, Y]) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: Y) => void'.
Types of parameters '__0' and 'value' are incompatible.
Type 'Y' is not assignable to type '[X, Y]'.
Property '0' is missing in type 'Y'.


Also, the error goes away if I change either type X or Y to the any type.










share|improve this question

























  • AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:10








  • 1





    Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:21











  • Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:22











  • Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:42














0












0








0








I have the following code which compiled without errors in rxjs 5:



a$ = Observable.combineLatest([x$, y$])
.subscribe(([x, y]:[X, Y]) => {


When I update to rxjs 6 the following error occurs:



Argument of type '([x, y]: [X, Y]) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: Y) => void'.
Types of parameters '__0' and 'value' are incompatible.
Type 'Y' is not assignable to type '[X, Y]'.
Property '0' is missing in type 'Y'.


Also, the error goes away if I change either type X or Y to the any type.










share|improve this question
















I have the following code which compiled without errors in rxjs 5:



a$ = Observable.combineLatest([x$, y$])
.subscribe(([x, y]:[X, Y]) => {


When I update to rxjs 6 the following error occurs:



Argument of type '([x, y]: [X, Y]) => void' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: Y) => void'.
Types of parameters '__0' and 'value' are incompatible.
Type 'Y' is not assignable to type '[X, Y]'.
Property '0' is missing in type 'Y'.


Also, the error goes away if I change either type X or Y to the any type.







typescript rxjs combinelatest






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 23:21







okhobb

















asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:54









okhobbokhobb

15411




15411













  • AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:10








  • 1





    Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:21











  • Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:22











  • Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:42



















  • AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:10








  • 1





    Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:21











  • Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

    – cartant
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:22











  • Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

    – okhobb
    Nov 12 '18 at 23:42

















AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

– cartant
Nov 12 '18 at 23:10







AFAICT, if you pass an array to combineLatest it's treated as an ObservableInput, so an error is appropriate. Try Observable.combineLatest(...[x$, y$])) - but the type inference will depend upon your TypeScript version.

– cartant
Nov 12 '18 at 23:10






1




1





Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

– okhobb
Nov 12 '18 at 23:21





Thanks for noting that it was an array. Your suggestion seems to have the same error but changing it to Observable.combineLatest(x$, y$) solved the error.

– okhobb
Nov 12 '18 at 23:21













Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

– cartant
Nov 12 '18 at 23:22





Yeah, the array is unnecessary.

– cartant
Nov 12 '18 at 23:22













Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

– okhobb
Nov 12 '18 at 23:42





Indeed I was updating from TypeScript 2 to 3 at the same time so perhaps the rxjs version was red herring here.

– okhobb
Nov 12 '18 at 23:42












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271276%2fwhy-does-rxjs-6-combinelatest-have-type-error-when-upgrading-from-rxjs-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271276%2fwhy-does-rxjs-6-combinelatest-have-type-error-when-upgrading-from-rxjs-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

さくらももこ

13 indicted, 8 arrested in Calif. drug cartel investigation