Mongoose methods on nested Schema












0















I'm attaching some methods to a childSchema, nesting it in a parentSchema, and then modelling the parentSchema. The childSchema seems to be undefined when this happens. This seems to be what the Mongoose docs are telling me to do, but it isn't working. Can anyone explain?





var childSchema = new Schema({name: 'string' });
childSchema.methods.getname = function () {
return this.name;
};
var Child = mongoose.model('Child', childSchema);


var parentSchema = new Schema({
child: childSchema
});
var Parent = mongoose.model('Parent', parentSchema);

const parent = new Parent();
parent.child.getName(); // This does not work. Can't getName of undefined

//Instead I have to do:
const parent = new Parent();
parent.child = new Child();
parent.child.getName(); // This works.




This seems terribly clunky for models with complex nested schemas. I must be doing something wrong.










share|improve this question























  • You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

    – Volodymyr
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:36











  • If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

    – Mattzees
    Nov 15 '18 at 2:44
















0















I'm attaching some methods to a childSchema, nesting it in a parentSchema, and then modelling the parentSchema. The childSchema seems to be undefined when this happens. This seems to be what the Mongoose docs are telling me to do, but it isn't working. Can anyone explain?





var childSchema = new Schema({name: 'string' });
childSchema.methods.getname = function () {
return this.name;
};
var Child = mongoose.model('Child', childSchema);


var parentSchema = new Schema({
child: childSchema
});
var Parent = mongoose.model('Parent', parentSchema);

const parent = new Parent();
parent.child.getName(); // This does not work. Can't getName of undefined

//Instead I have to do:
const parent = new Parent();
parent.child = new Child();
parent.child.getName(); // This works.




This seems terribly clunky for models with complex nested schemas. I must be doing something wrong.










share|improve this question























  • You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

    – Volodymyr
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:36











  • If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

    – Mattzees
    Nov 15 '18 at 2:44














0












0








0








I'm attaching some methods to a childSchema, nesting it in a parentSchema, and then modelling the parentSchema. The childSchema seems to be undefined when this happens. This seems to be what the Mongoose docs are telling me to do, but it isn't working. Can anyone explain?





var childSchema = new Schema({name: 'string' });
childSchema.methods.getname = function () {
return this.name;
};
var Child = mongoose.model('Child', childSchema);


var parentSchema = new Schema({
child: childSchema
});
var Parent = mongoose.model('Parent', parentSchema);

const parent = new Parent();
parent.child.getName(); // This does not work. Can't getName of undefined

//Instead I have to do:
const parent = new Parent();
parent.child = new Child();
parent.child.getName(); // This works.




This seems terribly clunky for models with complex nested schemas. I must be doing something wrong.










share|improve this question














I'm attaching some methods to a childSchema, nesting it in a parentSchema, and then modelling the parentSchema. The childSchema seems to be undefined when this happens. This seems to be what the Mongoose docs are telling me to do, but it isn't working. Can anyone explain?





var childSchema = new Schema({name: 'string' });
childSchema.methods.getname = function () {
return this.name;
};
var Child = mongoose.model('Child', childSchema);


var parentSchema = new Schema({
child: childSchema
});
var Parent = mongoose.model('Parent', parentSchema);

const parent = new Parent();
parent.child.getName(); // This does not work. Can't getName of undefined

//Instead I have to do:
const parent = new Parent();
parent.child = new Child();
parent.child.getName(); // This works.




This seems terribly clunky for models with complex nested schemas. I must be doing something wrong.







node.js mongodb mongoose






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 13 '18 at 17:00









MattzeesMattzees

82




82













  • You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

    – Volodymyr
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:36











  • If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

    – Mattzees
    Nov 15 '18 at 2:44



















  • You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

    – Volodymyr
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:36











  • If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

    – Mattzees
    Nov 15 '18 at 2:44

















You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

– Volodymyr
Nov 14 '18 at 1:36





You are creating a new Parent() without passing any arguments to the constuctor which basically means that parent will be an empty document . How do you expect mongoose to create a child inside it and how this child will look like?

– Volodymyr
Nov 14 '18 at 1:36













If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

– Mattzees
Nov 15 '18 at 2:44





If you look at the parentSchema, it contains a childSchema. This is how schemas are modeled inside the Mongoose documentation.

– Mattzees
Nov 15 '18 at 2:44












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53286062%2fmongoose-methods-on-nested-schema%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53286062%2fmongoose-methods-on-nested-schema%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

Bicuculline

さくらももこ