Typesetting d'Alembertian symbol
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I've seen that usually, the d'Alembertian is written using the command Box, however, this displays a square with all sides identical. I would like to write it in this other way:

in which, the right and below sides are bolder, so that resembles more to the Laplacian symbol.
symbols typography
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I've seen that usually, the d'Alembertian is written using the command Box, however, this displays a square with all sides identical. I would like to write it in this other way:

in which, the right and below sides are bolder, so that resembles more to the Laplacian symbol.
symbols typography
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Usesquarefor my opinion. It is very ugly theBoxsymbol.
– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
I've seen that usually, the d'Alembertian is written using the command Box, however, this displays a square with all sides identical. I would like to write it in this other way:

in which, the right and below sides are bolder, so that resembles more to the Laplacian symbol.
symbols typography
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've seen that usually, the d'Alembertian is written using the command Box, however, this displays a square with all sides identical. I would like to write it in this other way:

in which, the right and below sides are bolder, so that resembles more to the Laplacian symbol.
symbols typography
symbols typography
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Phelype Oleinik
20k54277
20k54277
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Janstillerion
462
462
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Janstillerion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Usesquarefor my opinion. It is very ugly theBoxsymbol.
– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
add a comment |
Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Usesquarefor my opinion. It is very ugly theBoxsymbol.
– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Use
square for my opinion. It is very ugly the Box symbol.– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Use
square for my opinion. It is very ugly the Box symbol.– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
To increase the boarder on two sides, you could use the ding{113} symbol from pifont
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pifont}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$text{ding{113}} Delta$
end{document}

1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Build a square with thicker lines the same size of square:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
makeatletter
newcommand{dalembertian}{mathop{mathpalettedalembertian@relax}}
newcommand{dalembertian@}[2]{%
begingroup
sboxz@{$m@th#1square$}%
dimen0=fontdimen8
ifx#1displaystyletextfontelse
ifx#1textstyletextfontelse
ifx#1scriptstylescriptfontelse
scriptscriptfontfififi3
makebox[wdz@]{%
hbox to htz@{%
vrule width dimen0
kern-dimen0
vbox to htz@{
hrule height dimen0 width htz@
vss
hrule height 2dimen0
}%
kern-2.5dimen0
vrule width 2.5dimen0
}%
}%
endgroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptscriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
{Large$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$}
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just uses rules. Then, scalerel to make it match the height of Delta.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{12pt}{.6pt}\
rule{.6pt}{10pt}kern10ptrule{1.4pt}{10pt}\
rule{12pt}{1.4pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

A slightly thicker version, by adjusting the rule dimensions...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{11pt}{.7pt}\
rule{.7pt}{9pt}kern9ptrule{1.3pt}{9pt}\
rule{11pt}{1.35pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Here's a version using scalebox and overlapping three copies of square so that the thickness can be tweaked. The thickness can be changed by increasing or reducing the second argument to add@dalemb.
For instance, with 03 and 06:
and with 05 and 10:
Thicker than this, another add@dalemb would be needed to avoid white spaces between the squares.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddalemb{mathpaletteinner@dalemb{}}
definner@dalemb#1{%
add@dalemb#1{03}%
add@dalemb#1{06}%
square
}
defadd@dalemb#1#2{%
sbox0{scalebox{1.#2}{$#1square$}}%
rlap{lower0.#2ht0box0}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
[ Deltadalemb ]
[ partial^{Deltadalemb} ]
[ partial^{partial^{Deltadalemb}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
To increase the boarder on two sides, you could use the ding{113} symbol from pifont
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pifont}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$text{ding{113}} Delta$
end{document}

1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
To increase the boarder on two sides, you could use the ding{113} symbol from pifont
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pifont}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$text{ding{113}} Delta$
end{document}

1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
To increase the boarder on two sides, you could use the ding{113} symbol from pifont
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pifont}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$text{ding{113}} Delta$
end{document}

To increase the boarder on two sides, you could use the ding{113} symbol from pifont
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pifont}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$text{ding{113}} Delta$
end{document}

edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
samcarter
80.8k788256
80.8k788256
1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
1
1
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
Yes, this is close to what I'm looking for, but strokes are maybe too thick.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago
2
2
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
@Janstillerion Some other package define similar symbols. For an overview have a look at tug.ctan.org/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf
– samcarter
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Build a square with thicker lines the same size of square:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
makeatletter
newcommand{dalembertian}{mathop{mathpalettedalembertian@relax}}
newcommand{dalembertian@}[2]{%
begingroup
sboxz@{$m@th#1square$}%
dimen0=fontdimen8
ifx#1displaystyletextfontelse
ifx#1textstyletextfontelse
ifx#1scriptstylescriptfontelse
scriptscriptfontfififi3
makebox[wdz@]{%
hbox to htz@{%
vrule width dimen0
kern-dimen0
vbox to htz@{
hrule height dimen0 width htz@
vss
hrule height 2dimen0
}%
kern-2.5dimen0
vrule width 2.5dimen0
}%
}%
endgroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptscriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
{Large$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$}
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Build a square with thicker lines the same size of square:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
makeatletter
newcommand{dalembertian}{mathop{mathpalettedalembertian@relax}}
newcommand{dalembertian@}[2]{%
begingroup
sboxz@{$m@th#1square$}%
dimen0=fontdimen8
ifx#1displaystyletextfontelse
ifx#1textstyletextfontelse
ifx#1scriptstylescriptfontelse
scriptscriptfontfififi3
makebox[wdz@]{%
hbox to htz@{%
vrule width dimen0
kern-dimen0
vbox to htz@{
hrule height dimen0 width htz@
vss
hrule height 2dimen0
}%
kern-2.5dimen0
vrule width 2.5dimen0
}%
}%
endgroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptscriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
{Large$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$}
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Build a square with thicker lines the same size of square:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
makeatletter
newcommand{dalembertian}{mathop{mathpalettedalembertian@relax}}
newcommand{dalembertian@}[2]{%
begingroup
sboxz@{$m@th#1square$}%
dimen0=fontdimen8
ifx#1displaystyletextfontelse
ifx#1textstyletextfontelse
ifx#1scriptstylescriptfontelse
scriptscriptfontfififi3
makebox[wdz@]{%
hbox to htz@{%
vrule width dimen0
kern-dimen0
vbox to htz@{
hrule height dimen0 width htz@
vss
hrule height 2dimen0
}%
kern-2.5dimen0
vrule width 2.5dimen0
}%
}%
endgroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptscriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
{Large$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$}
end{document}

Build a square with thicker lines the same size of square:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
makeatletter
newcommand{dalembertian}{mathop{mathpalettedalembertian@relax}}
newcommand{dalembertian@}[2]{%
begingroup
sboxz@{$m@th#1square$}%
dimen0=fontdimen8
ifx#1displaystyletextfontelse
ifx#1textstyletextfontelse
ifx#1scriptstylescriptfontelse
scriptscriptfontfififi3
makebox[wdz@]{%
hbox to htz@{%
vrule width dimen0
kern-dimen0
vbox to htz@{
hrule height dimen0 width htz@
vss
hrule height 2dimen0
}%
kern-2.5dimen0
vrule width 2.5dimen0
}%
}%
endgroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
$scriptscriptstyledalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$
{Large$dalembertian = mathop{{}Delta}-partial_0^2$}
end{document}

answered 2 days ago
egreg
696k8518483111
696k8518483111
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just uses rules. Then, scalerel to make it match the height of Delta.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{12pt}{.6pt}\
rule{.6pt}{10pt}kern10ptrule{1.4pt}{10pt}\
rule{12pt}{1.4pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

A slightly thicker version, by adjusting the rule dimensions...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{11pt}{.7pt}\
rule{.7pt}{9pt}kern9ptrule{1.3pt}{9pt}\
rule{11pt}{1.35pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just uses rules. Then, scalerel to make it match the height of Delta.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{12pt}{.6pt}\
rule{.6pt}{10pt}kern10ptrule{1.4pt}{10pt}\
rule{12pt}{1.4pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

A slightly thicker version, by adjusting the rule dimensions...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{11pt}{.7pt}\
rule{.7pt}{9pt}kern9ptrule{1.3pt}{9pt}\
rule{11pt}{1.35pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Just uses rules. Then, scalerel to make it match the height of Delta.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{12pt}{.6pt}\
rule{.6pt}{10pt}kern10ptrule{1.4pt}{10pt}\
rule{12pt}{1.4pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

A slightly thicker version, by adjusting the rule dimensions...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{11pt}{.7pt}\
rule{.7pt}{9pt}kern9ptrule{1.3pt}{9pt}\
rule{11pt}{1.35pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

Just uses rules. Then, scalerel to make it match the height of Delta.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{12pt}{.6pt}\
rule{.6pt}{10pt}kern10ptrule{1.4pt}{10pt}\
rule{12pt}{1.4pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

A slightly thicker version, by adjusting the rule dimensions...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine,scalerel}
newcommanddAlaux{%
Shortstack{rule{11pt}{.7pt}\
rule{.7pt}{9pt}kern9ptrule{1.3pt}{9pt}\
rule{11pt}{1.35pt}}%
}
newcommanddAl{%
setstackgap{S}{0pt}%
setstackEOL{\}%
scalerel*{kern1ptdAlauxkern1pt}{Delta}%
}
begin{document}
$dAl = Delta - partial_0^2,quad phidAlphi e^{phidAlphi}$
end{document}

edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Steven B. Segletes
151k9188396
151k9188396
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Here's a version using scalebox and overlapping three copies of square so that the thickness can be tweaked. The thickness can be changed by increasing or reducing the second argument to add@dalemb.
For instance, with 03 and 06:
and with 05 and 10:
Thicker than this, another add@dalemb would be needed to avoid white spaces between the squares.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddalemb{mathpaletteinner@dalemb{}}
definner@dalemb#1{%
add@dalemb#1{03}%
add@dalemb#1{06}%
square
}
defadd@dalemb#1#2{%
sbox0{scalebox{1.#2}{$#1square$}}%
rlap{lower0.#2ht0box0}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
[ Deltadalemb ]
[ partial^{Deltadalemb} ]
[ partial^{partial^{Deltadalemb}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Here's a version using scalebox and overlapping three copies of square so that the thickness can be tweaked. The thickness can be changed by increasing or reducing the second argument to add@dalemb.
For instance, with 03 and 06:
and with 05 and 10:
Thicker than this, another add@dalemb would be needed to avoid white spaces between the squares.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddalemb{mathpaletteinner@dalemb{}}
definner@dalemb#1{%
add@dalemb#1{03}%
add@dalemb#1{06}%
square
}
defadd@dalemb#1#2{%
sbox0{scalebox{1.#2}{$#1square$}}%
rlap{lower0.#2ht0box0}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
[ Deltadalemb ]
[ partial^{Deltadalemb} ]
[ partial^{partial^{Deltadalemb}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Here's a version using scalebox and overlapping three copies of square so that the thickness can be tweaked. The thickness can be changed by increasing or reducing the second argument to add@dalemb.
For instance, with 03 and 06:
and with 05 and 10:
Thicker than this, another add@dalemb would be needed to avoid white spaces between the squares.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddalemb{mathpaletteinner@dalemb{}}
definner@dalemb#1{%
add@dalemb#1{03}%
add@dalemb#1{06}%
square
}
defadd@dalemb#1#2{%
sbox0{scalebox{1.#2}{$#1square$}}%
rlap{lower0.#2ht0box0}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
[ Deltadalemb ]
[ partial^{Deltadalemb} ]
[ partial^{partial^{Deltadalemb}} ]
end{document}
Here's a version using scalebox and overlapping three copies of square so that the thickness can be tweaked. The thickness can be changed by increasing or reducing the second argument to add@dalemb.
For instance, with 03 and 06:
and with 05 and 10:
Thicker than this, another add@dalemb would be needed to avoid white spaces between the squares.
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{graphicx}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddalemb{mathpaletteinner@dalemb{}}
definner@dalemb#1{%
add@dalemb#1{03}%
add@dalemb#1{06}%
square
}
defadd@dalemb#1#2{%
sbox0{scalebox{1.#2}{$#1square$}}%
rlap{lower0.#2ht0box0}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
[ Deltadalemb ]
[ partial^{Deltadalemb} ]
[ partial^{partial^{Deltadalemb}} ]
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Phelype Oleinik
20k54277
20k54277
add a comment |
add a comment |
Janstillerion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Janstillerion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Janstillerion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Janstillerion is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459167%2ftypesetting-dalembertian-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password


Welcome to the site TeX.SE. Can you give a suggestion? Use
squarefor my opinion. It is very ugly theBoxsymbol.– Sebastiano
2 days ago
Thanks for the welcome! square is indeed a better option since the scaling is better to the Box, however, it still presents no difference in the strokes.
– Janstillerion
2 days ago