pros and cons to serve compressed sitemaps from flask or nginx (wish to save space on disk)











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



    I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



    I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



    What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



    Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



      I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



      I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



      What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



      Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?










      share|improve this question













      I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



      I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



      I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



      What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



      Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?







      nginx flask sitemap






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 15:00









      user305883

      5091722




      5091722





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240193%2fpros-and-cons-to-serve-compressed-sitemaps-from-flask-or-nginx-wish-to-save-spa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240193%2fpros-and-cons-to-serve-compressed-sitemaps-from-flask-or-nginx-wish-to-save-spa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Full-time equivalent

          さくらももこ

          13 indicted, 8 arrested in Calif. drug cartel investigation