How can I count pairs when the columns are equal/not equal in TSQL












2















I have a dataset that I want to count when the pairs are equal and not equal, grouping by one column. A toy dataset would look like this:



DECLARE @t Table (
SampleNumber varchar(max),
SampleType varchar(max),
A varchar(max),
B varchar(max))

INSERT INTO @t VALUES
('B1','DD','PASS','FAIL'),
('B1','DS','PASS','FAIL'),
('B2','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B2','DS','PASS','PASS'),
('B3','DD','NA','NA'),
('B3','DS','NA','PASS'),
('B4','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B4','DS','PASS','FAIL')

SELECT * FROM @t


So for this dataset I would like the output to look something like this:



NewOutput
I will note that I have about many SampleNumbers (100+) and about 10 columns (e.g. A through J) that I need to roll the data up from so I was hoping to a flexible solution.



It would be horribly inefficient to split the SampleType into two temp tables (e.g. DD and DS) and join by SampleNumber.



How would I accomplish this?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:00













  • Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:02













  • Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:11
















2















I have a dataset that I want to count when the pairs are equal and not equal, grouping by one column. A toy dataset would look like this:



DECLARE @t Table (
SampleNumber varchar(max),
SampleType varchar(max),
A varchar(max),
B varchar(max))

INSERT INTO @t VALUES
('B1','DD','PASS','FAIL'),
('B1','DS','PASS','FAIL'),
('B2','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B2','DS','PASS','PASS'),
('B3','DD','NA','NA'),
('B3','DS','NA','PASS'),
('B4','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B4','DS','PASS','FAIL')

SELECT * FROM @t


So for this dataset I would like the output to look something like this:



NewOutput
I will note that I have about many SampleNumbers (100+) and about 10 columns (e.g. A through J) that I need to roll the data up from so I was hoping to a flexible solution.



It would be horribly inefficient to split the SampleType into two temp tables (e.g. DD and DS) and join by SampleNumber.



How would I accomplish this?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:00













  • Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:02













  • Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:11














2












2








2








I have a dataset that I want to count when the pairs are equal and not equal, grouping by one column. A toy dataset would look like this:



DECLARE @t Table (
SampleNumber varchar(max),
SampleType varchar(max),
A varchar(max),
B varchar(max))

INSERT INTO @t VALUES
('B1','DD','PASS','FAIL'),
('B1','DS','PASS','FAIL'),
('B2','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B2','DS','PASS','PASS'),
('B3','DD','NA','NA'),
('B3','DS','NA','PASS'),
('B4','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B4','DS','PASS','FAIL')

SELECT * FROM @t


So for this dataset I would like the output to look something like this:



NewOutput
I will note that I have about many SampleNumbers (100+) and about 10 columns (e.g. A through J) that I need to roll the data up from so I was hoping to a flexible solution.



It would be horribly inefficient to split the SampleType into two temp tables (e.g. DD and DS) and join by SampleNumber.



How would I accomplish this?










share|improve this question
















I have a dataset that I want to count when the pairs are equal and not equal, grouping by one column. A toy dataset would look like this:



DECLARE @t Table (
SampleNumber varchar(max),
SampleType varchar(max),
A varchar(max),
B varchar(max))

INSERT INTO @t VALUES
('B1','DD','PASS','FAIL'),
('B1','DS','PASS','FAIL'),
('B2','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B2','DS','PASS','PASS'),
('B3','DD','NA','NA'),
('B3','DS','NA','PASS'),
('B4','DD','PASS','PASS'),
('B4','DS','PASS','FAIL')

SELECT * FROM @t


So for this dataset I would like the output to look something like this:



NewOutput
I will note that I have about many SampleNumbers (100+) and about 10 columns (e.g. A through J) that I need to roll the data up from so I was hoping to a flexible solution.



It would be horribly inefficient to split the SampleType into two temp tables (e.g. DD and DS) and join by SampleNumber.



How would I accomplish this?







sql-server tsql count






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 13 '18 at 18:30







user918967

















asked Nov 13 '18 at 15:58









user918967user918967

84541435




84541435








  • 1





    Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:00













  • Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:02













  • Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:11














  • 1





    Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:00













  • Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

    – Larnu
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:02













  • Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 16:11








1




1





Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

– Larnu
Nov 13 '18 at 16:00







Have you tried using a CASE expression inside your COUNT/SUM?

– Larnu
Nov 13 '18 at 16:00















Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

– Larnu
Nov 13 '18 at 16:02







Also, should 'NA','PASS not be counted in both the Pass and NA rows in Disagree, or is the grouping based solely on the value of A?

– Larnu
Nov 13 '18 at 16:02















Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 16:11





Its just if the pairs (DD/DS) are equal (e.g. if B1 DD = B1 DS ). So B4 DD-DS in column A is equal (PASS=PASS) but B4 DD-DS in column B is not equal (PASS != FAIL)

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 16:11












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














SELECT IQ.A, SUM(IQ.X) as DD_AGREE, SUM(1 -IQ.X) AS DD_DIsagree
FROM
(SELECT A,CASE WHEN A = B THEN 1 ELSE 0 END X FROM @t) IQ
GROUP BY IQ.A
UNION SELECT B, 0,0 FROM @T where B NOT IN(SELECT t2.A FROM @t t2)





share|improve this answer
























  • I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:24













  • I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:28











  • in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

    – Cato
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:21











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53284843%2fhow-can-i-count-pairs-when-the-columns-are-equal-not-equal-in-tsql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














SELECT IQ.A, SUM(IQ.X) as DD_AGREE, SUM(1 -IQ.X) AS DD_DIsagree
FROM
(SELECT A,CASE WHEN A = B THEN 1 ELSE 0 END X FROM @t) IQ
GROUP BY IQ.A
UNION SELECT B, 0,0 FROM @T where B NOT IN(SELECT t2.A FROM @t t2)





share|improve this answer
























  • I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:24













  • I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:28











  • in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

    – Cato
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:21
















0














SELECT IQ.A, SUM(IQ.X) as DD_AGREE, SUM(1 -IQ.X) AS DD_DIsagree
FROM
(SELECT A,CASE WHEN A = B THEN 1 ELSE 0 END X FROM @t) IQ
GROUP BY IQ.A
UNION SELECT B, 0,0 FROM @T where B NOT IN(SELECT t2.A FROM @t t2)





share|improve this answer
























  • I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:24













  • I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:28











  • in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

    – Cato
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:21














0












0








0







SELECT IQ.A, SUM(IQ.X) as DD_AGREE, SUM(1 -IQ.X) AS DD_DIsagree
FROM
(SELECT A,CASE WHEN A = B THEN 1 ELSE 0 END X FROM @t) IQ
GROUP BY IQ.A
UNION SELECT B, 0,0 FROM @T where B NOT IN(SELECT t2.A FROM @t t2)





share|improve this answer













SELECT IQ.A, SUM(IQ.X) as DD_AGREE, SUM(1 -IQ.X) AS DD_DIsagree
FROM
(SELECT A,CASE WHEN A = B THEN 1 ELSE 0 END X FROM @t) IQ
GROUP BY IQ.A
UNION SELECT B, 0,0 FROM @T where B NOT IN(SELECT t2.A FROM @t t2)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 13 '18 at 17:22









CatoCato

2,892210




2,892210













  • I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:24













  • I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:28











  • in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

    – Cato
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:21



















  • I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:24













  • I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

    – user918967
    Nov 13 '18 at 18:28











  • in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

    – Cato
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:21

















I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 18:24







I am thinking this gives the correct answer but for the wrong reason? It should not check Column A vs Column B but instead Row1 Column A vs Row2 Column A, Row3 Column A vs Row4 Column A and so on.

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 18:24















I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 18:28





I will change the data to show what I mean by making Row1 and Row2 of Column B both be Fail and they should agree.

– user918967
Nov 13 '18 at 18:28













in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

– Cato
Nov 14 '18 at 10:21





in that case you will also need a row_number, or some sort of specified order, at the moment it isn't clear how the order of rows is determined

– Cato
Nov 14 '18 at 10:21


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53284843%2fhow-can-i-count-pairs-when-the-columns-are-equal-not-equal-in-tsql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

さくらももこ

13 indicted, 8 arrested in Calif. drug cartel investigation