SOAP-ERROR when consuming .NET SOAP service and passing a complex type parameter
TL,DR: When consuming a SOAP service, PHP seems to always require all value types to be included in the objects but .NET doesn't seem to, suggestions ?
I have a SOAP service written in .NET (.asmx
) which is being consumed by a PHP client developed by a 3rd party.
I have a [DataMember]
of type Guid
which poses no issues on my end, I can omit it when I initialize my complex parameter object in my "test" console application and no errors arise, here is a stripped down version of the code and the "test" application:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexType
{
[DataMember] public Guid Id {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member1 {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member2 {get; set;}
}
// -------------------
// this is a console application
var client = new MyServiceRef.MyServiceClient();
var obj = new MyServiceRef.ComplexType
{
Member1 = "Data1",
Member2 = "Data2"
// I don't include here the 'Id' member of ComplexType
};
var ret = client.MyMethod(obj);
// Works with no errors
// Inspecting obj I see 'Id' is auto-initialized as Guid.Empty
// -------------------
I also tested the service in SOAPUI, omitting the field from the payload doesn't raise any kind of issue and everything works.
On the other end, when consuming the service in PHP they experience this error
SOAP-ERROR: Encoding: object has no 'Id' property
Seems like PHP is more strict in this regard, but I don't know enough about PHP to provide a meaningful suggestion.
A workaround I can think of on my end is making everything Nullable<T>
: this would solve this particular issue, but is that the right way to approach this situation ?
c# php web-services soap
add a comment |
TL,DR: When consuming a SOAP service, PHP seems to always require all value types to be included in the objects but .NET doesn't seem to, suggestions ?
I have a SOAP service written in .NET (.asmx
) which is being consumed by a PHP client developed by a 3rd party.
I have a [DataMember]
of type Guid
which poses no issues on my end, I can omit it when I initialize my complex parameter object in my "test" console application and no errors arise, here is a stripped down version of the code and the "test" application:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexType
{
[DataMember] public Guid Id {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member1 {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member2 {get; set;}
}
// -------------------
// this is a console application
var client = new MyServiceRef.MyServiceClient();
var obj = new MyServiceRef.ComplexType
{
Member1 = "Data1",
Member2 = "Data2"
// I don't include here the 'Id' member of ComplexType
};
var ret = client.MyMethod(obj);
// Works with no errors
// Inspecting obj I see 'Id' is auto-initialized as Guid.Empty
// -------------------
I also tested the service in SOAPUI, omitting the field from the payload doesn't raise any kind of issue and everything works.
On the other end, when consuming the service in PHP they experience this error
SOAP-ERROR: Encoding: object has no 'Id' property
Seems like PHP is more strict in this regard, but I don't know enough about PHP to provide a meaningful suggestion.
A workaround I can think of on my end is making everything Nullable<T>
: this would solve this particular issue, but is that the right way to approach this situation ?
c# php web-services soap
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
TL,DR: When consuming a SOAP service, PHP seems to always require all value types to be included in the objects but .NET doesn't seem to, suggestions ?
I have a SOAP service written in .NET (.asmx
) which is being consumed by a PHP client developed by a 3rd party.
I have a [DataMember]
of type Guid
which poses no issues on my end, I can omit it when I initialize my complex parameter object in my "test" console application and no errors arise, here is a stripped down version of the code and the "test" application:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexType
{
[DataMember] public Guid Id {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member1 {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member2 {get; set;}
}
// -------------------
// this is a console application
var client = new MyServiceRef.MyServiceClient();
var obj = new MyServiceRef.ComplexType
{
Member1 = "Data1",
Member2 = "Data2"
// I don't include here the 'Id' member of ComplexType
};
var ret = client.MyMethod(obj);
// Works with no errors
// Inspecting obj I see 'Id' is auto-initialized as Guid.Empty
// -------------------
I also tested the service in SOAPUI, omitting the field from the payload doesn't raise any kind of issue and everything works.
On the other end, when consuming the service in PHP they experience this error
SOAP-ERROR: Encoding: object has no 'Id' property
Seems like PHP is more strict in this regard, but I don't know enough about PHP to provide a meaningful suggestion.
A workaround I can think of on my end is making everything Nullable<T>
: this would solve this particular issue, but is that the right way to approach this situation ?
c# php web-services soap
TL,DR: When consuming a SOAP service, PHP seems to always require all value types to be included in the objects but .NET doesn't seem to, suggestions ?
I have a SOAP service written in .NET (.asmx
) which is being consumed by a PHP client developed by a 3rd party.
I have a [DataMember]
of type Guid
which poses no issues on my end, I can omit it when I initialize my complex parameter object in my "test" console application and no errors arise, here is a stripped down version of the code and the "test" application:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexType
{
[DataMember] public Guid Id {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member1 {get; set;}
[DataMember] public string Member2 {get; set;}
}
// -------------------
// this is a console application
var client = new MyServiceRef.MyServiceClient();
var obj = new MyServiceRef.ComplexType
{
Member1 = "Data1",
Member2 = "Data2"
// I don't include here the 'Id' member of ComplexType
};
var ret = client.MyMethod(obj);
// Works with no errors
// Inspecting obj I see 'Id' is auto-initialized as Guid.Empty
// -------------------
I also tested the service in SOAPUI, omitting the field from the payload doesn't raise any kind of issue and everything works.
On the other end, when consuming the service in PHP they experience this error
SOAP-ERROR: Encoding: object has no 'Id' property
Seems like PHP is more strict in this regard, but I don't know enough about PHP to provide a meaningful suggestion.
A workaround I can think of on my end is making everything Nullable<T>
: this would solve this particular issue, but is that the right way to approach this situation ?
c# php web-services soap
c# php web-services soap
asked Nov 12 '18 at 9:46
AlexAlex
20k32963
20k32963
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259478%2fsoap-error-when-consuming-net-soap-service-and-passing-a-complex-type-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259478%2fsoap-error-when-consuming-net-soap-service-and-passing-a-complex-type-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Since my knowledge of SOAP services is hit and miss I might have missed some information, of course feel free to point it out and I'll amend the question.
– Alex
Nov 12 '18 at 9:47