How to get the explicit path of a Julia function?












1















I try to use @which but it leads me to a page on GitHub with the code, however I want to know the explicit path in my computer i.e. the file that is used when I call the function. for example broadcast(+, A, A) where A is an Array, I thought the path was:



C:UsersuserAppDataLocalJulia-0.6.3sharejuliabasebroadcast.jl


but when I edited it, changing some value return, and then use the function, there is not any change, Which makes me think that it is not the desired file.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

    – Gnimuc
    Nov 13 '18 at 5:47






  • 1





    @edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

    – DNF
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:03






  • 1





    @DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

    – crstnbr
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:08






  • 1





    Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

    – Bogumił Kamiński
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:50






  • 1





    Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

    – daycaster
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:23
















1















I try to use @which but it leads me to a page on GitHub with the code, however I want to know the explicit path in my computer i.e. the file that is used when I call the function. for example broadcast(+, A, A) where A is an Array, I thought the path was:



C:UsersuserAppDataLocalJulia-0.6.3sharejuliabasebroadcast.jl


but when I edited it, changing some value return, and then use the function, there is not any change, Which makes me think that it is not the desired file.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

    – Gnimuc
    Nov 13 '18 at 5:47






  • 1





    @edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

    – DNF
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:03






  • 1





    @DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

    – crstnbr
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:08






  • 1





    Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

    – Bogumił Kamiński
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:50






  • 1





    Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

    – daycaster
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:23














1












1








1


1






I try to use @which but it leads me to a page on GitHub with the code, however I want to know the explicit path in my computer i.e. the file that is used when I call the function. for example broadcast(+, A, A) where A is an Array, I thought the path was:



C:UsersuserAppDataLocalJulia-0.6.3sharejuliabasebroadcast.jl


but when I edited it, changing some value return, and then use the function, there is not any change, Which makes me think that it is not the desired file.










share|improve this question














I try to use @which but it leads me to a page on GitHub with the code, however I want to know the explicit path in my computer i.e. the file that is used when I call the function. for example broadcast(+, A, A) where A is an Array, I thought the path was:



C:UsersuserAppDataLocalJulia-0.6.3sharejuliabasebroadcast.jl


but when I edited it, changing some value return, and then use the function, there is not any change, Which makes me think that it is not the desired file.







function path julia-lang






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 13 '18 at 5:03









4lrdyD4lrdyD

345




345








  • 1





    use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

    – Gnimuc
    Nov 13 '18 at 5:47






  • 1





    @edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

    – DNF
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:03






  • 1





    @DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

    – crstnbr
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:08






  • 1





    Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

    – Bogumił Kamiński
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:50






  • 1





    Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

    – daycaster
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:23














  • 1





    use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

    – Gnimuc
    Nov 13 '18 at 5:47






  • 1





    @edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

    – DNF
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:03






  • 1





    @DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

    – crstnbr
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:08






  • 1





    Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

    – Bogumił Kamiński
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:50






  • 1





    Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

    – daycaster
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:23








1




1





use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

– Gnimuc
Nov 13 '18 at 5:47





use Revise.jl if you wanna edit a base function.

– Gnimuc
Nov 13 '18 at 5:47




1




1





@edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

– DNF
Nov 13 '18 at 7:03





@edit broadcast(+, A, A) will open the correct file in an editor.

– DNF
Nov 13 '18 at 7:03




1




1





@DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

– crstnbr
Nov 13 '18 at 8:08





@DNF is right. If it doesn't then set the environmental variable JULIA_EDITOR.

– crstnbr
Nov 13 '18 at 8:08




1




1





Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

– Bogumił Kamiński
Nov 13 '18 at 8:50





Just to add a comment to all the comments above - I would not recommend you to change Base like this. The way it is best to do it is to change a specific method after starting Julia. If you want it to be changed every time you start Julia put the relevant code in startup.jl file.

– Bogumił Kamiński
Nov 13 '18 at 8:50




1




1





Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

– daycaster
Nov 13 '18 at 9:23





Don't you have to rebuild the system image if you modify base functions? (docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/sysimg/…)

– daycaster
Nov 13 '18 at 9:23












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














This is an attempt to (sort of) summarize what has been written in the comments already.



Before anything, as @daycaster mentioned correctly, changes to Base source files won't take effect until you recompile your system image. So, the path you gave is actually correct.



In the REPL, using @which will tell you where the function is defined (name of the Base file and line number):



julia> @which 3+3
+(x::T, y::T) where T<:Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8} in Base at int.jl:53


Integer addition is defined in line 53 of int.jl in the base folder of your local julia installation. In Jupyter (maybe also in Juno?) this is automatically made clickable and will bring you to the respective line on github.



If you told Julia what you favorite editor is, by setting JULIA_EDITOR to e.g. vim, you can use @edit 3+3 to get an editor instance at the right file and line locally.



(Note that there is a URL bug on Windows which leads to incorrect URLs for methods living in standard libraries.)



In any case, as @BogumiłKamiński mentioned, you probably shouldn't modify the julia source in the first place. Just "overwrite" the relevant method in an open Julia session (you can do it in your startup.jl if you want this to be locally permanent):



julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> Base.inv(x::Integer) = begin println("JUHU!"); float(one(x)) / float(x) end

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


If (for some mysterious reasons) you really want to make the change in a Base source file, you can use Revise.jl, as mentioned by @Gnimuc. This would look like this:



julia> using Revise

julia> Revise.track(Base)

julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> @edit inv(3) # make a change

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


However, this isn't much different from just overwriting the method yourself. It also won't be permanent.



UPDATE:
I just realized that you're still on 0.6. In that case the file isn't called startup.jl but juliarc.jl. Also the Windows URL bug doesn't effect you then.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

    – 4lrdyD
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:40











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53274123%2fhow-to-get-the-explicit-path-of-a-julia-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














This is an attempt to (sort of) summarize what has been written in the comments already.



Before anything, as @daycaster mentioned correctly, changes to Base source files won't take effect until you recompile your system image. So, the path you gave is actually correct.



In the REPL, using @which will tell you where the function is defined (name of the Base file and line number):



julia> @which 3+3
+(x::T, y::T) where T<:Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8} in Base at int.jl:53


Integer addition is defined in line 53 of int.jl in the base folder of your local julia installation. In Jupyter (maybe also in Juno?) this is automatically made clickable and will bring you to the respective line on github.



If you told Julia what you favorite editor is, by setting JULIA_EDITOR to e.g. vim, you can use @edit 3+3 to get an editor instance at the right file and line locally.



(Note that there is a URL bug on Windows which leads to incorrect URLs for methods living in standard libraries.)



In any case, as @BogumiłKamiński mentioned, you probably shouldn't modify the julia source in the first place. Just "overwrite" the relevant method in an open Julia session (you can do it in your startup.jl if you want this to be locally permanent):



julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> Base.inv(x::Integer) = begin println("JUHU!"); float(one(x)) / float(x) end

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


If (for some mysterious reasons) you really want to make the change in a Base source file, you can use Revise.jl, as mentioned by @Gnimuc. This would look like this:



julia> using Revise

julia> Revise.track(Base)

julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> @edit inv(3) # make a change

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


However, this isn't much different from just overwriting the method yourself. It also won't be permanent.



UPDATE:
I just realized that you're still on 0.6. In that case the file isn't called startup.jl but juliarc.jl. Also the Windows URL bug doesn't effect you then.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

    – 4lrdyD
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:40
















3














This is an attempt to (sort of) summarize what has been written in the comments already.



Before anything, as @daycaster mentioned correctly, changes to Base source files won't take effect until you recompile your system image. So, the path you gave is actually correct.



In the REPL, using @which will tell you where the function is defined (name of the Base file and line number):



julia> @which 3+3
+(x::T, y::T) where T<:Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8} in Base at int.jl:53


Integer addition is defined in line 53 of int.jl in the base folder of your local julia installation. In Jupyter (maybe also in Juno?) this is automatically made clickable and will bring you to the respective line on github.



If you told Julia what you favorite editor is, by setting JULIA_EDITOR to e.g. vim, you can use @edit 3+3 to get an editor instance at the right file and line locally.



(Note that there is a URL bug on Windows which leads to incorrect URLs for methods living in standard libraries.)



In any case, as @BogumiłKamiński mentioned, you probably shouldn't modify the julia source in the first place. Just "overwrite" the relevant method in an open Julia session (you can do it in your startup.jl if you want this to be locally permanent):



julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> Base.inv(x::Integer) = begin println("JUHU!"); float(one(x)) / float(x) end

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


If (for some mysterious reasons) you really want to make the change in a Base source file, you can use Revise.jl, as mentioned by @Gnimuc. This would look like this:



julia> using Revise

julia> Revise.track(Base)

julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> @edit inv(3) # make a change

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


However, this isn't much different from just overwriting the method yourself. It also won't be permanent.



UPDATE:
I just realized that you're still on 0.6. In that case the file isn't called startup.jl but juliarc.jl. Also the Windows URL bug doesn't effect you then.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

    – 4lrdyD
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:40














3












3








3







This is an attempt to (sort of) summarize what has been written in the comments already.



Before anything, as @daycaster mentioned correctly, changes to Base source files won't take effect until you recompile your system image. So, the path you gave is actually correct.



In the REPL, using @which will tell you where the function is defined (name of the Base file and line number):



julia> @which 3+3
+(x::T, y::T) where T<:Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8} in Base at int.jl:53


Integer addition is defined in line 53 of int.jl in the base folder of your local julia installation. In Jupyter (maybe also in Juno?) this is automatically made clickable and will bring you to the respective line on github.



If you told Julia what you favorite editor is, by setting JULIA_EDITOR to e.g. vim, you can use @edit 3+3 to get an editor instance at the right file and line locally.



(Note that there is a URL bug on Windows which leads to incorrect URLs for methods living in standard libraries.)



In any case, as @BogumiłKamiński mentioned, you probably shouldn't modify the julia source in the first place. Just "overwrite" the relevant method in an open Julia session (you can do it in your startup.jl if you want this to be locally permanent):



julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> Base.inv(x::Integer) = begin println("JUHU!"); float(one(x)) / float(x) end

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


If (for some mysterious reasons) you really want to make the change in a Base source file, you can use Revise.jl, as mentioned by @Gnimuc. This would look like this:



julia> using Revise

julia> Revise.track(Base)

julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> @edit inv(3) # make a change

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


However, this isn't much different from just overwriting the method yourself. It also won't be permanent.



UPDATE:
I just realized that you're still on 0.6. In that case the file isn't called startup.jl but juliarc.jl. Also the Windows URL bug doesn't effect you then.






share|improve this answer















This is an attempt to (sort of) summarize what has been written in the comments already.



Before anything, as @daycaster mentioned correctly, changes to Base source files won't take effect until you recompile your system image. So, the path you gave is actually correct.



In the REPL, using @which will tell you where the function is defined (name of the Base file and line number):



julia> @which 3+3
+(x::T, y::T) where T<:Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8} in Base at int.jl:53


Integer addition is defined in line 53 of int.jl in the base folder of your local julia installation. In Jupyter (maybe also in Juno?) this is automatically made clickable and will bring you to the respective line on github.



If you told Julia what you favorite editor is, by setting JULIA_EDITOR to e.g. vim, you can use @edit 3+3 to get an editor instance at the right file and line locally.



(Note that there is a URL bug on Windows which leads to incorrect URLs for methods living in standard libraries.)



In any case, as @BogumiłKamiński mentioned, you probably shouldn't modify the julia source in the first place. Just "overwrite" the relevant method in an open Julia session (you can do it in your startup.jl if you want this to be locally permanent):



julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> Base.inv(x::Integer) = begin println("JUHU!"); float(one(x)) / float(x) end

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


If (for some mysterious reasons) you really want to make the change in a Base source file, you can use Revise.jl, as mentioned by @Gnimuc. This would look like this:



julia> using Revise

julia> Revise.track(Base)

julia> inv(3)
0.3333333333333333

julia> @edit inv(3) # make a change

julia> inv(3)
JUHU!
0.3333333333333333


However, this isn't much different from just overwriting the method yourself. It also won't be permanent.



UPDATE:
I just realized that you're still on 0.6. In that case the file isn't called startup.jl but juliarc.jl. Also the Windows URL bug doesn't effect you then.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 13 '18 at 13:48

























answered Nov 13 '18 at 13:43









crstnbrcrstnbr

3,91911022




3,91911022













  • Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

    – 4lrdyD
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:40



















  • Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

    – 4lrdyD
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:40

















Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

– 4lrdyD
Nov 14 '18 at 1:40





Thank you very much, this will help me a lot.

– 4lrdyD
Nov 14 '18 at 1:40


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53274123%2fhow-to-get-the-explicit-path-of-a-julia-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Full-time equivalent

さくらももこ

13 indicted, 8 arrested in Calif. drug cartel investigation