PrimeFaces organigram division issue
In PrimeFaces 6.2 organigram showcase, when I remove employees from Team Mobile division
Before
After
it shows iOS division as a subdivision of Android.
Exected
I checked the options and I found no solution for this.
primefaces
add a comment |
In PrimeFaces 6.2 organigram showcase, when I remove employees from Team Mobile division
Before
After
it shows iOS division as a subdivision of Android.
Exected
I checked the options and I found no solution for this.
primefaces
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
In PrimeFaces 6.2 organigram showcase, when I remove employees from Team Mobile division
Before
After
it shows iOS division as a subdivision of Android.
Exected
I checked the options and I found no solution for this.
primefaces
In PrimeFaces 6.2 organigram showcase, when I remove employees from Team Mobile division
Before
After
it shows iOS division as a subdivision of Android.
Exected
I checked the options and I found no solution for this.
primefaces
primefaces
asked Nov 13 '18 at 7:54
BetlistaBetlista
6,93475082
6,93475082
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I got the same problem in a earlier version and just added
skipLeafHandling="true"
to my nodes, so every node is placed like there could be a leaf.
<p:organigramNode type="division" skipLeafHandling="true" styleClass="division"
icon="ui-icon-suitcase" iconPos="left">
....
</p:organigramNode>
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
This seems to be 'by design' and 'collapsing' childeren on the same level and not as a subdivision since there are no lines in between. Try dragging employees to other nodes that already contain employees. It makes them appear identical
Even combinations of employees and empty teams.
If you want to prevent this, see the other answer by @VitalijKochno
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276256%2fprimefaces-organigram-division-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I got the same problem in a earlier version and just added
skipLeafHandling="true"
to my nodes, so every node is placed like there could be a leaf.
<p:organigramNode type="division" skipLeafHandling="true" styleClass="division"
icon="ui-icon-suitcase" iconPos="left">
....
</p:organigramNode>
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
I got the same problem in a earlier version and just added
skipLeafHandling="true"
to my nodes, so every node is placed like there could be a leaf.
<p:organigramNode type="division" skipLeafHandling="true" styleClass="division"
icon="ui-icon-suitcase" iconPos="left">
....
</p:organigramNode>
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
I got the same problem in a earlier version and just added
skipLeafHandling="true"
to my nodes, so every node is placed like there could be a leaf.
<p:organigramNode type="division" skipLeafHandling="true" styleClass="division"
icon="ui-icon-suitcase" iconPos="left">
....
</p:organigramNode>
I got the same problem in a earlier version and just added
skipLeafHandling="true"
to my nodes, so every node is placed like there could be a leaf.
<p:organigramNode type="division" skipLeafHandling="true" styleClass="division"
icon="ui-icon-suitcase" iconPos="left">
....
</p:organigramNode>
answered Nov 19 '18 at 15:54
VikantoVikanto
461
461
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
Ouch... I wanted to test that part but forgot. Good addition.
– Kukeltje
Nov 19 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
This seems to be 'by design' and 'collapsing' childeren on the same level and not as a subdivision since there are no lines in between. Try dragging employees to other nodes that already contain employees. It makes them appear identical
Even combinations of employees and empty teams.
If you want to prevent this, see the other answer by @VitalijKochno
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
This seems to be 'by design' and 'collapsing' childeren on the same level and not as a subdivision since there are no lines in between. Try dragging employees to other nodes that already contain employees. It makes them appear identical
Even combinations of employees and empty teams.
If you want to prevent this, see the other answer by @VitalijKochno
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
This seems to be 'by design' and 'collapsing' childeren on the same level and not as a subdivision since there are no lines in between. Try dragging employees to other nodes that already contain employees. It makes them appear identical
Even combinations of employees and empty teams.
If you want to prevent this, see the other answer by @VitalijKochno
This seems to be 'by design' and 'collapsing' childeren on the same level and not as a subdivision since there are no lines in between. Try dragging employees to other nodes that already contain employees. It makes them appear identical
Even combinations of employees and empty teams.
If you want to prevent this, see the other answer by @VitalijKochno
edited Nov 19 '18 at 18:41
answered Nov 13 '18 at 11:53
KukeltjeKukeltje
8,82441438
8,82441438
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
It seems to me, that tables are used still in 6.3...
– Betlista
Nov 18 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53276256%2fprimefaces-organigram-division-issue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
idownvotedbecau.se/nomcve
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 8:38
@Kukeltje Can you be more specific, what is missing? I linked to PrimeFaces' showcase, sources are also available. What is unclear?
– Betlista
Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
Several things. First it is common practice to post code inline in SO since external sites may be volatile. Secondly, there is lots of code in the showcase (including number of nodes, events, context menu etc) that does not play a role in your problem. So it is not a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
– Kukeltje
Nov 13 '18 at 11:25