Proposition 64
Marijuana Legalization
Results Votes % Yes 7,979,041 7001571300000000000♠57.13% No 5,987,020 7001428709999900000♠42.87% Valid votes 13,966,061 7001955900000000000♠95.59% Invalid or blank votes 644,448 7000441000000000000♠4.41% Total votes 14,610,509 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 19,411,771 7001752700000000000♠75.27%
Results by County For   72.5%–75%   70%–72.49%   67.5%–69.99%   65%–67.49%   62.5%–64.99%   60%–62.49%   57.5%–59.99%   55%–57.49%   52.5%–54.99%   50%–52.49% Against   52.51%–50.01%   55%–52.51%   57.5%–55.01%
Source: California Secretary of State[1]

Elections in California
Federal government Presidential elections 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 Primary elections Democratic 2000 2004 2008 2016 Republican 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 United States Senate elections 1950 1980 1982 1986 1988 1992 1992 (special) 1994 1998 2000 2004 2006 2010 2012 2016 2018 Congressional elections At-Large (1849-1863) 1864 1867 1868 1871 1872 1875 1876 1879 1880 1882 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 12th (1946) 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 11th (2006) 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Special elections to the House 5th (2005) 48th (2005) 36th (2007) 12th (2008) 10th (2009) 32nd (2009) 36th (2011) 34th (2017)
State government (executive) Gubernatorial elections 1849 1851 1853 1855 1857 1859 1861 1863 1867 1871 1875 1879 1882 1886 1890 1894 1898 1902 1906 1910 1914 1918 1922 1926 1930 1934 1938 1942 1946 1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2003 (recall) 2006 2010 2014 2018 Lieutenant gubernatorial elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Attorney General elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Secretary of State elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Treasurer elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Controller elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Insurance Commissioner elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Superintendent of Public Instruction elections 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 State Board of Equalization elections 2018
State government (legislative) State Senate elections 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Special State Assembly elections 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Special
State government (judicial) Court of Appeals elections 1994 1998 2002 2006
Propositions 1910–1919 1911 4 7 8 1960–1969 1964 14 1970–1979 1974 9 1978 8 13 Briggs Initiative 1980–1989 1982 8 1986 64 65 1988 98 99 1990–1999 1994 187 1996 196 209 215 218 1998 6 10 227 2000–2009 2000 21 22 36 39 2003 53 54 2004 1A 55 56 57 58 59 60 60A 61 62 63 64 65 66 69 71 2005 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 2006 81 82 83 85 87 89 90 2008 91 92 93 94, 95, 96, and 97 98 and 99 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2009 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 2010–2019 2010 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2012 29 30 32 34 37 38 39 2014 1 2 41 42 45 46 47 48 2016 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 2018 68 69 70 71 72 6 9 Full list
Elections by year State elections Nov 1992 Nov 1994 Nov 1996 Nov 1998 Nov 2000 Nov 2002 Nov 2004 Nov 2005 Nov 2006 Feb 2008 Jun 2008 Nov 2008 May 2009 Jun 2010 Nov 2010 Jun 2012 Nov 2012 2014 Jun 2016 2018
Los Angeles Mayoral elections 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1909 (M) 1909 (N) 1911 1913 1915 1917 1919 1921 1923 1925 1929 1933 1937 1938 1941 1945 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 General elections 2009 2011 City Attorney elections 2009 Board of Supervisors elections 1980 1996 2006 2008 2010 2012
San Diego Mayoral elections 1887 1889 1891 1893 1895 1897 1899 1901 1903 1905 1907 1909 1911 1913 1915 1917 1919 1921 1923 1925 1927 1929 1931 1932 1935 1939 1943 1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1984 1986 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2005 2008 2012 2013–14 2016 2020 City Council elections 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Special City Attorney elections 2004 2008 2012 2016 General elections Jun 2010 Nov 2010 Jun 2012 Nov 2012 Jun 2014 Nov 2014 Jun 2016 Nov 2016
San Francisco Mayoral elections 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2018 2019 Board of Supervisors elections 1977 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 General elections Mar 2004 Nov 2004 Nov 2005 Jun 2006 Nov 2006 Nov 2007 Feb 2008 Jun 2008 Nov 2008 Nov 2009 Jun 2010 Nov 2010 Nov 2011 Jun 2012 Nov 2012 Nov 2013
San Jose Mayoral elections 2014
v t e

The Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) (Proposition 64) was a 2016 voter initiative to legalize cannabis in California. The full name is the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act.^[2] The initiative passed with 57% voter approval and became law on November 9, 2016,^[3][4] leading to recreational cannabis sales in California by January 2018.

History[edit]

Possession or sale of cannabis in the United States is prohibited by federal law. In 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the Controlled Substances Act, establishing marijuana as a Schedule I drug, the strictest level of prohibition. Voters then rejected California Proposition 19 (1972), which sought to remove the criminalization of marijuana under California law.^[5] In 1976, Governor Jerry Brown signed the Moscone Act, which reduced the penalty for possession of marijuana from a felony to a misdemeanor.

Voters passed California Proposition 215 (1996), making California the first state to legalize medical cannabis in the United States.^[6] In United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative (2001), the Supreme Court of the United States found that California's medical prescription providers were still subject to criminal prosecution.^[7] In Gonzales v. Raich (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court found that Congress's interstate commerce clause power allowed it to prohibit an Oroville, California woman, who was following California law, from growing and consuming marijuana entirely inside her home.^[8]

In September 2010, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation reducing possession of marijuana from a criminal misdemeanor to a civil infraction. In November voters rejected California Proposition 19 (2010), which would have legalized recreational marijuana use, imposed no state taxes, and allowed employers to fire an employee for workplace use of marijuana only after showing it had caused impaired work.^[9]

In 2012, voters passed Washington Initiative 502 and Colorado Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use in those states. Two other states followed later in 2014, when voters passed Oregon Ballot Measure 91 (2014) and Alaska Measure 2 (2014).
In July 2015, Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Stanford University faculty released the final report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Marijuana Policy, which recommended regulations for recreational marijuana use in California.^[10]

On May 4, 2016, the group sponsoring the initiative announced that it had collected over 600,000 signatures for the proposal; enough to get it on the 2016 ballot.^[11][12] On June 28, the measure was certified by the Secretary of State for the November ballot.^[13] On July 1, the Secretary of State released a list of propositions with AUMA listed as Proposition 64, then later in the day renumbered it to 63; and, on July 2, released a final list restoring it to Proposition 64.^[14]

Content[edit]

According to California Legislative Analyst's Office, the measure changes California law to legalize the possession, cultivation, and sale of marijuana. Individuals over age 21 are allowed to possess, cultivate and sell marijuana; the state regulates commercial activities related to commerce for recreational use; a 15% excise tax and an additional $9.25 per ounce of flower or $2.75 per ounce of leaf will be collected; and possession and cultivation of certain amounts for personal use is legalized statewide.^[15]

The Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) (Proposition 64) provides an array of opportunities ranging from economic stimulation of several markets and industries to financial relief of the criminal justice system, which are over-burdened with backlogged and pending cases for non-violent cannabis offenders.^[16]

Under Prop 64, new state regulation laws will require stringent product development systems to establish distributional industry standards regarding testing, packaging and labeling.^[17]

Prop 64's new state regulations provide a platform for a fully transparent, highly efficient seed-to-sale tracking system through the newly created State Regulatory Agency—the Bureau of Marijuana Control—formerly known as the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation.^[18]

Additionally, the Medical Marijuana Industry will be regulated by several other state agencies: the California Department of Food and Agriculture (to license and regulate marijuana cultivation); the California Department of Public Health (to license and monitor manufacturing of marijuana edibles); the California State Water Resources Control Board (to "regulate the environmental impacts of marijuana growing on water quality"); the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (to regulate cultivation-related impacts on local environments); and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (to regulate nutrients and pesticides utilized for marijuana cultivation).^[17]

AUMA allows adults to possess up to an ounce of marijuana.^[19] Adults are also allowed to cultivate up to six marijuana plants inside their homes.^[19] Marijuana packaging is now required to provide the net weight, origin, age, and type of the product, as well as the milligram amount per serving of tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, and other cannabinoids, and if any pesticides were used during cultivation.^[19]

Smoking marijuana in public is subject to a $100 fine.^[19]Driving under the influence of marijuana remains illegal, although some California Highway Patrol officers are concerned that they will be unable to identify intoxicated drivers.^[20] The penalty for unlicensed sale of marijuana is now reduced from four years in state prison to six months in county jail.^[15]

Revenue paid into the new California Marijuana Tax Fund will allocate 60% of outflows to youth programs, 20% to environmental damage cleanup, and 20% to public safety.^[15] Businesses selling marijuana require a license from the state-level Bureau of Marijuana Control, and local governments decide permits for businesses to allow on-site consumption.^[15] Marijuana shops are prohibited from the sale or consumption of alcohol or tobacco.^[15] Recreational marijuana shops began to open in January 2018, with many districts beginning recreational sales on the first or fifth of January 2018.^[19] Local governments are allowed to completely ban marijuana-related businesses.^[15]

Reactions and analysis[edit]

State financial analysts estimated Proposition 64 could increase tax revenue by hundreds of millions to one billion dollars.^[21] Independent analysts estimated the measure would reduce state and local government expenditures by tens of millions of dollars.^[21]

California NORML endorsed the initiative as of March 2016, saying "as well as one of the world's largest economies, California is arguably the most important state to consider marijuana legalization this year."^[22][23]

Ballotpedia called the measure "a clear leader and the most likely to reach the ballot in November 2016".^[24]

The Los Angeles Times stated in February, 2016 that the measure was one of 20 legalization initiatives for the 2016 ballot and was the "clear favorite to make the November ballot" due to support from individual donors and well-funded advocacy groups.^[25] Billionaire Sean Parker donated $1 million to the effort to get the measure on the ballot,^[26] and Weedmaps donated $500,000.^[27]

Newsweek stated the success of the initiative would be influential given California's national importance as a "regulatory laboratory",^[28] and Reason magazine stated it was poised to approximately triple the number of U.S. residents living in states with legalization.^[29]Deseret News (Salt Lake City) expressed concern over a "potential problem when it comes to minorities and recreational marijuana" if the measure passed. Deseret News cited an NPR report from Colorado to conclude that in California, white youth arrests could fall faster than those of minorities, or minority arrests could even increase due to lack of minority access to legal sales and nonwhite ownership of cannabis businesses, worsening the effect of "systemic racism" in pursuing drug crime.^[30]

The emerging legal marijuana industry is overwhelmingly white-owned and white-dominated and provides good access to white customers," he says. "So one possibility is that that leaves the illegal market disproportionately composed of people of color, both the buyers and the sellers.

— Keith Humphreys, Stanford University, Morning Edition (NPR)^[31]

Supporters[edit]

The California Medical Association endorsed the measure in February, 2016.^[32] United States Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican, endorsed AUMA in late April, 2016.^[33] Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders indicated his support for AUMA while campaigning in California in May, 2016.^[34][35][36] The California Democratic Party endorsed AUMA in June, 2016.^[37] On July 21, 2016, The Sacramento Bee reported that Gov. Gary Johnson, Libertarian candidate for President, endorsed California's initiative to legalize marijuana.^[38] Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi endorsed it a few days before the election, becoming "one of the highest ranking politicians...openly supporting legalization".^[39]

Proponents spent $24.7 million fighting for the measure, with the top contribution being $8.8 million from Sean Parker and affiliates.^[21] The measure was supported by the editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times^[40] and the San Francisco Chronicle.^[41]

Opponents[edit]

A number of organizations like the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, the California Hospitals Association, and the Automobile Club of Southern California expressed opposition to the initiative.^[42][43] The California Teamsters Union switched their position to neutral after contributing a relatively large amount to the opposition campaign.^[44] According to Capital Public Radio, a Sacramento Superior Court judge ordered the ballot's official arguments to be rewritten after U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein's claim that Proposition 64 would allow marijuana advertising on primetime television was debunked as "mostly false" by PolitiFact.com.^[45]

Opponents spent $1.6 million fighting the measure.^[21] The measure was opposed by the editorial board of The Sacramento Bee.^[46]

Public opinion[edit]

Removal of past cannabis infractions[edit]

On January 31, 2018, San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón announced his department would begin to retroactively apply Proposition 64 to misdemeanor and felony marijuana convictions dating back to 1975, recalling and re-sentencing up to 4,940 felony marijuana convictions and dismissing and sealing 3,038 misdemeanors.^[47]

See also[edit]

• List of 2016 United States cannabis reform proposals

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]

• Adult Use of Marijuana Act text


• The Adult Use of Marijuana Act Initiative official website


• No On Prop. 64


• 
  Official Voter guide for California voters, November 2016, pages 14, 90-99, 212-218.