Clojure spec - naming entity keywords
Is it considered bad practice to use namespace-qualified keywords with nonexistent namespaces, for defining specs? I'd like to have entity maps defined in common domain namespace... so to avoid loosing data when merging specs, I've used convention :entity/attribute
instead of ::entity-attribute
for attributes and standard ::entity
for entities. It aligns nicer to database tables and columns. Each entity in a separate namespace reminds me of Java classes, doesn't sound like a good idea.
(s/def :country/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :country/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def ::country
(s/keys :req [:country/id
:country/name]))
;; ----------------------------------------
(s/def :location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :location/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def :location/zipcode ::nilable-non-empty-string)
(s/def ::location
(s/merge
(s/keys :req [:location/id
:location/name
:location/zipcode])
(s/or :country ::country
:country-id
(s/keys :req [:country/id]))))
clojure clojure.spec
add a comment |
Is it considered bad practice to use namespace-qualified keywords with nonexistent namespaces, for defining specs? I'd like to have entity maps defined in common domain namespace... so to avoid loosing data when merging specs, I've used convention :entity/attribute
instead of ::entity-attribute
for attributes and standard ::entity
for entities. It aligns nicer to database tables and columns. Each entity in a separate namespace reminds me of Java classes, doesn't sound like a good idea.
(s/def :country/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :country/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def ::country
(s/keys :req [:country/id
:country/name]))
;; ----------------------------------------
(s/def :location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :location/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def :location/zipcode ::nilable-non-empty-string)
(s/def ::location
(s/merge
(s/keys :req [:location/id
:location/name
:location/zipcode])
(s/or :country ::country
:country-id
(s/keys :req [:country/id]))))
clojure clojure.spec
1
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39
add a comment |
Is it considered bad practice to use namespace-qualified keywords with nonexistent namespaces, for defining specs? I'd like to have entity maps defined in common domain namespace... so to avoid loosing data when merging specs, I've used convention :entity/attribute
instead of ::entity-attribute
for attributes and standard ::entity
for entities. It aligns nicer to database tables and columns. Each entity in a separate namespace reminds me of Java classes, doesn't sound like a good idea.
(s/def :country/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :country/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def ::country
(s/keys :req [:country/id
:country/name]))
;; ----------------------------------------
(s/def :location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :location/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def :location/zipcode ::nilable-non-empty-string)
(s/def ::location
(s/merge
(s/keys :req [:location/id
:location/name
:location/zipcode])
(s/or :country ::country
:country-id
(s/keys :req [:country/id]))))
clojure clojure.spec
Is it considered bad practice to use namespace-qualified keywords with nonexistent namespaces, for defining specs? I'd like to have entity maps defined in common domain namespace... so to avoid loosing data when merging specs, I've used convention :entity/attribute
instead of ::entity-attribute
for attributes and standard ::entity
for entities. It aligns nicer to database tables and columns. Each entity in a separate namespace reminds me of Java classes, doesn't sound like a good idea.
(s/def :country/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :country/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def ::country
(s/keys :req [:country/id
:country/name]))
;; ----------------------------------------
(s/def :location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
(s/def :location/name ::non-empty-string)
(s/def :location/zipcode ::nilable-non-empty-string)
(s/def ::location
(s/merge
(s/keys :req [:location/id
:location/name
:location/zipcode])
(s/or :country ::country
:country-id
(s/keys :req [:country/id]))))
clojure clojure.spec
clojure clojure.spec
edited Nov 13 '18 at 11:10
Nikola
asked Nov 13 '18 at 10:58
NikolaNikola
305
305
1
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39
add a comment |
1
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39
1
1
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As @glts commented, here is the right answer: mailing list.
I've decided to make keywords more specific, added this to the domain namespace:
(doseq [ns ["entity-1" ,,, "entity-n"]]
(->> (str "project.domain." ns)
(symbol)
(create-ns)
(alias (symbol ns))))
And then ::entity-n/attribute
evaluates to :project.domain.entity-n/attribute
.
Only one additional :
is needed for the attributes from the question-example:
(s/def ::location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53279505%2fclojure-spec-naming-entity-keywords%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As @glts commented, here is the right answer: mailing list.
I've decided to make keywords more specific, added this to the domain namespace:
(doseq [ns ["entity-1" ,,, "entity-n"]]
(->> (str "project.domain." ns)
(symbol)
(create-ns)
(alias (symbol ns))))
And then ::entity-n/attribute
evaluates to :project.domain.entity-n/attribute
.
Only one additional :
is needed for the attributes from the question-example:
(s/def ::location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
add a comment |
As @glts commented, here is the right answer: mailing list.
I've decided to make keywords more specific, added this to the domain namespace:
(doseq [ns ["entity-1" ,,, "entity-n"]]
(->> (str "project.domain." ns)
(symbol)
(create-ns)
(alias (symbol ns))))
And then ::entity-n/attribute
evaluates to :project.domain.entity-n/attribute
.
Only one additional :
is needed for the attributes from the question-example:
(s/def ::location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
add a comment |
As @glts commented, here is the right answer: mailing list.
I've decided to make keywords more specific, added this to the domain namespace:
(doseq [ns ["entity-1" ,,, "entity-n"]]
(->> (str "project.domain." ns)
(symbol)
(create-ns)
(alias (symbol ns))))
And then ::entity-n/attribute
evaluates to :project.domain.entity-n/attribute
.
Only one additional :
is needed for the attributes from the question-example:
(s/def ::location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
As @glts commented, here is the right answer: mailing list.
I've decided to make keywords more specific, added this to the domain namespace:
(doseq [ns ["entity-1" ,,, "entity-n"]]
(->> (str "project.domain." ns)
(symbol)
(create-ns)
(alias (symbol ns))))
And then ::entity-n/attribute
evaluates to :project.domain.entity-n/attribute
.
Only one additional :
is needed for the attributes from the question-example:
(s/def ::location/id ::nilable-nat-int)
answered Nov 14 '18 at 1:22
NikolaNikola
305
305
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53279505%2fclojure-spec-naming-entity-keywords%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
On the mailing list: groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/TcRXF3a0bNI/pafdYbTnAwAJ
– glts
Nov 13 '18 at 18:39