Microsoft Access - Sub Query running very slow
I am trying to pull together a rolling 12 month total for each customer at each period end. The Periods table has a line for each customer for each required period.
The query is as follows - which works but runs extremely slowly.
SELECT Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account,
(SELECT Sum(sa_trvalue) FROM [Sales Transactions]
WHERE ((sa_trdate<= Periods.[Period_End])
AND (sa_trdate>= Periods.[LTM_Start]) )
AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
AS Total
FROM Periods
GROUP BY Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
sql ms-access
add a comment |
I am trying to pull together a rolling 12 month total for each customer at each period end. The Periods table has a line for each customer for each required period.
The query is as follows - which works but runs extremely slowly.
SELECT Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account,
(SELECT Sum(sa_trvalue) FROM [Sales Transactions]
WHERE ((sa_trdate<= Periods.[Period_End])
AND (sa_trdate>= Periods.[LTM_Start]) )
AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
AS Total
FROM Periods
GROUP BY Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
sql ms-access
add a comment |
I am trying to pull together a rolling 12 month total for each customer at each period end. The Periods table has a line for each customer for each required period.
The query is as follows - which works but runs extremely slowly.
SELECT Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account,
(SELECT Sum(sa_trvalue) FROM [Sales Transactions]
WHERE ((sa_trdate<= Periods.[Period_End])
AND (sa_trdate>= Periods.[LTM_Start]) )
AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
AS Total
FROM Periods
GROUP BY Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
sql ms-access
I am trying to pull together a rolling 12 month total for each customer at each period end. The Periods table has a line for each customer for each required period.
The query is as follows - which works but runs extremely slowly.
SELECT Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account,
(SELECT Sum(sa_trvalue) FROM [Sales Transactions]
WHERE ((sa_trdate<= Periods.[Period_End])
AND (sa_trdate>= Periods.[LTM_Start]) )
AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
AS Total
FROM Periods
GROUP BY Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
sql ms-access
sql ms-access
edited Nov 11 '18 at 23:51
Lee Mac
3,47131339
3,47131339
asked Nov 11 '18 at 19:19
Natalie
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your query will be slow to evaluate due to your use of a correlated subquery, whereby the query referencing the Sales Transactions
table will be evaluated for every record of the Periods
table.
You should be able to improve the performance through the appropriate use of joins, for example, something like the following should yield the same result:
SELECT
Periods.LTM_Start,
Periods.Period_End,
Periods.sa_account,
SUM
(
IIF
(
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate >= Periods.[LTM_Start] AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate <= Periods.[Period_End],
[Sales Transactions].sa_trvalue,
0
)
) AS Total
FROM
Periods LEFT JOIN [Sales Transactions]
ON [Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
GROUP BY
Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subqueryWHERE
clause is moved toIIF
(or in other SQL dialects: theCASE
statement).
– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252304%2fmicrosoft-access-sub-query-running-very-slow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your query will be slow to evaluate due to your use of a correlated subquery, whereby the query referencing the Sales Transactions
table will be evaluated for every record of the Periods
table.
You should be able to improve the performance through the appropriate use of joins, for example, something like the following should yield the same result:
SELECT
Periods.LTM_Start,
Periods.Period_End,
Periods.sa_account,
SUM
(
IIF
(
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate >= Periods.[LTM_Start] AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate <= Periods.[Period_End],
[Sales Transactions].sa_trvalue,
0
)
) AS Total
FROM
Periods LEFT JOIN [Sales Transactions]
ON [Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
GROUP BY
Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subqueryWHERE
clause is moved toIIF
(or in other SQL dialects: theCASE
statement).
– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
add a comment |
Your query will be slow to evaluate due to your use of a correlated subquery, whereby the query referencing the Sales Transactions
table will be evaluated for every record of the Periods
table.
You should be able to improve the performance through the appropriate use of joins, for example, something like the following should yield the same result:
SELECT
Periods.LTM_Start,
Periods.Period_End,
Periods.sa_account,
SUM
(
IIF
(
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate >= Periods.[LTM_Start] AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate <= Periods.[Period_End],
[Sales Transactions].sa_trvalue,
0
)
) AS Total
FROM
Periods LEFT JOIN [Sales Transactions]
ON [Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
GROUP BY
Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subqueryWHERE
clause is moved toIIF
(or in other SQL dialects: theCASE
statement).
– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
add a comment |
Your query will be slow to evaluate due to your use of a correlated subquery, whereby the query referencing the Sales Transactions
table will be evaluated for every record of the Periods
table.
You should be able to improve the performance through the appropriate use of joins, for example, something like the following should yield the same result:
SELECT
Periods.LTM_Start,
Periods.Period_End,
Periods.sa_account,
SUM
(
IIF
(
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate >= Periods.[LTM_Start] AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate <= Periods.[Period_End],
[Sales Transactions].sa_trvalue,
0
)
) AS Total
FROM
Periods LEFT JOIN [Sales Transactions]
ON [Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
GROUP BY
Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
Your query will be slow to evaluate due to your use of a correlated subquery, whereby the query referencing the Sales Transactions
table will be evaluated for every record of the Periods
table.
You should be able to improve the performance through the appropriate use of joins, for example, something like the following should yield the same result:
SELECT
Periods.LTM_Start,
Periods.Period_End,
Periods.sa_account,
SUM
(
IIF
(
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate >= Periods.[LTM_Start] AND
[Sales Transactions].sa_trdate <= Periods.[Period_End],
[Sales Transactions].sa_trvalue,
0
)
) AS Total
FROM
Periods LEFT JOIN [Sales Transactions]
ON [Sales Transactions].sa_account = Periods.[sa_account]
GROUP BY
Periods.LTM_Start, Periods.Period_End, Periods.sa_account;
answered Nov 11 '18 at 23:51
Lee Mac
3,47131339
3,47131339
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subqueryWHERE
clause is moved toIIF
(or in other SQL dialects: theCASE
statement).
– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
add a comment |
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subqueryWHERE
clause is moved toIIF
(or in other SQL dialects: theCASE
statement).
– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
1
1
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subquery
WHERE
clause is moved to IIF
(or in other SQL dialects: the CASE
statement).– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
Also, too, this is known as conditional aggregation where the former subquery
WHERE
clause is moved to IIF
(or in other SQL dialects: the CASE
statement).– Parfait
Nov 12 '18 at 0:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252304%2fmicrosoft-access-sub-query-running-very-slow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown