How to change the http status code after starting writing to the HttpContext.Response.Body stream in ASP.NET...
I often see that writing to the HttpContext.Response.Body
stream is a bad practice (or using PushStreamContent
or StreamContent
as part of a HttpMessageResponse) cause then you cannot change the HTTP status code if there is something wrong happening.
Is there any workaround to actually perform async
writing to the output stream while being able to change HTTP status code in case the operation goes wrong?
c# .net .net-core streaming asp.net-core-webapi
add a comment |
I often see that writing to the HttpContext.Response.Body
stream is a bad practice (or using PushStreamContent
or StreamContent
as part of a HttpMessageResponse) cause then you cannot change the HTTP status code if there is something wrong happening.
Is there any workaround to actually perform async
writing to the output stream while being able to change HTTP status code in case the operation goes wrong?
c# .net .net-core streaming asp.net-core-webapi
add a comment |
I often see that writing to the HttpContext.Response.Body
stream is a bad practice (or using PushStreamContent
or StreamContent
as part of a HttpMessageResponse) cause then you cannot change the HTTP status code if there is something wrong happening.
Is there any workaround to actually perform async
writing to the output stream while being able to change HTTP status code in case the operation goes wrong?
c# .net .net-core streaming asp.net-core-webapi
I often see that writing to the HttpContext.Response.Body
stream is a bad practice (or using PushStreamContent
or StreamContent
as part of a HttpMessageResponse) cause then you cannot change the HTTP status code if there is something wrong happening.
Is there any workaround to actually perform async
writing to the output stream while being able to change HTTP status code in case the operation goes wrong?
c# .net .net-core streaming asp.net-core-webapi
c# .net .net-core streaming asp.net-core-webapi
asked Nov 11 at 20:08
Ehouarn Perret
91211131
91211131
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes. Best practise is write Middleware. For example:
public class ErrorWrappingMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ErrorWrappingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
await context.Response.WriteAsync(...); // change you response body if needed
}
}
}
and inject them to your pipeline
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
...
app.UseMiddleware<ErrorWrappingMiddleware>();
...
}
And of course you can change your logic in your midleware as you wish, include change Response Code as you wish. Also, you can throw you own exception type, like MyOwnException
, catch then in middleware and invoke you own logic wich related to your exception.
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252743%2fhow-to-change-the-http-status-code-after-starting-writing-to-the-httpcontext-res%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes. Best practise is write Middleware. For example:
public class ErrorWrappingMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ErrorWrappingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
await context.Response.WriteAsync(...); // change you response body if needed
}
}
}
and inject them to your pipeline
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
...
app.UseMiddleware<ErrorWrappingMiddleware>();
...
}
And of course you can change your logic in your midleware as you wish, include change Response Code as you wish. Also, you can throw you own exception type, like MyOwnException
, catch then in middleware and invoke you own logic wich related to your exception.
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
add a comment |
Yes. Best practise is write Middleware. For example:
public class ErrorWrappingMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ErrorWrappingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
await context.Response.WriteAsync(...); // change you response body if needed
}
}
}
and inject them to your pipeline
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
...
app.UseMiddleware<ErrorWrappingMiddleware>();
...
}
And of course you can change your logic in your midleware as you wish, include change Response Code as you wish. Also, you can throw you own exception type, like MyOwnException
, catch then in middleware and invoke you own logic wich related to your exception.
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
add a comment |
Yes. Best practise is write Middleware. For example:
public class ErrorWrappingMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ErrorWrappingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
await context.Response.WriteAsync(...); // change you response body if needed
}
}
}
and inject them to your pipeline
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
...
app.UseMiddleware<ErrorWrappingMiddleware>();
...
}
And of course you can change your logic in your midleware as you wish, include change Response Code as you wish. Also, you can throw you own exception type, like MyOwnException
, catch then in middleware and invoke you own logic wich related to your exception.
Yes. Best practise is write Middleware. For example:
public class ErrorWrappingMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public ErrorWrappingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
await context.Response.WriteAsync(...); // change you response body if needed
}
}
}
and inject them to your pipeline
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
...
app.UseMiddleware<ErrorWrappingMiddleware>();
...
}
And of course you can change your logic in your midleware as you wish, include change Response Code as you wish. Also, you can throw you own exception type, like MyOwnException
, catch then in middleware and invoke you own logic wich related to your exception.
answered Nov 11 at 20:34
Sergey Shulik
678824
678824
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
add a comment |
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
thanks that's an interesting solution!
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:48
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
I should have thought about it when reading that part a year ago ^^': docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/… And also to be careful about the order: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/…
– Ehouarn Perret
Nov 11 at 20:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252743%2fhow-to-change-the-http-status-code-after-starting-writing-to-the-httpcontext-res%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown